Paper · 2007 · Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science

Growth response of Juvenile Passion Fruit (Passiflora Edulis, F. Falvicarpa) to organic and inorganic fertilizer in South Western Nigeria

I O Aiyelaagbe; I O Abiola; M A Sadiku; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of organic fertilizer (amended composted city refuse) and inorganic fertilizer (NPK + Mg 12-12-17+2) on the growth of juvenile passion fruit seedlings were investigated at Abeokuta, southwestern Nigeria between 2003 and 2005. In the 2003/2004 season, organic fertilizer was applied at 1.5 and 3.0 t ha-1. In the 2004/2005 season, it was applied at 5 – 20 t ha-1. In both seasons, no fertilizer plots or those which received 500 kg N ha-1 sourced from inorganic fertilizer served as controls. In both cropping seasons, the effects of the different rates of organic fertilizer on the vine length, number of leaves, leaf area, number of branches and number of tendrils of passion fruit did not differ significantly from one another or no fertilizer application. Dry matter production followed similar trends. However, except for dry weight of stem and root, inorganic fertilizer produced significantly larger growth attributes than organic fertilizer and no fertilizer application. This indicates that 20 t ha-1 of organic fertilizer is sub-optimal for vigorous growth of passion fruit. Keywords: fertilizer, passion fruit, vegetative growth. Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science Vol. 10 2005: pp. 18-22

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer rates did not differ significantly from each other or no fertilizer in the listed vine growth traits.

Taxon
passion fruitPassiflora edulise0
Treatment
different rates of organic fertilizere0
Outcome
vine length, number of leaves, leaf area, number of branches and number of tendrilse0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
no fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both cropping seasons, the effects of the different rates of organic fertilizer on the vine length, number of leaves, leaf area, number of branches and number of tendrils of passion fruit did not differ significantly from one another or no fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter production followed the same nonsignificant pattern under organic fertilizer.

Taxon
passion fruitPassiflora edulise1
Treatment
different rates of organic fertilizere1
Outcome
Dry matter productione0
Direction
did not differe1
Comparator
no fertilizer applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Passion Fruit (Passiflora Edulis, F. Falvicarpa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dry matter production followed similar trends.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–817 · show in text ↑
e1

“the different rates of organic fertilizer on the vine length, number of leaves, leaf area, number of branches and number of tendrils of passion fruit did not differ significantly from one another or no fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer produced significantly larger growth attributes than organic fertilizer and no fertilizer, apart from stem and root dry weight.

Taxon
Passion FruitPassiflora edulist0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
growth attributese0
Direction
largere0
Qualifier
except for dry weight of stem and roote0
Comparator
organic fertilizer and no fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Passion Fruit (Passiflora Edulis, F. Falvicarpa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“except for dry weight of stem and root, inorganic fertilizer produced significantly larger growth attributes than organic fertilizer and no fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–989 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret 20 t ha-1 organic fertilizer as suboptimal for vigorous passion fruit growth.

Taxon
passion fruitPassiflora edulise0
Treatment
20 t ha-1 of organic fertilizere0
Outcome
sub-optimal for vigorous growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Passion Fruit (Passiflora Edulis, F. Falvicarpa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“20 t ha-1 of organic fertilizer is sub-optimal for vigorous growth of passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1094 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.