Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer produced significantly larger growth attributes than organic fertilizer and no fertilizer, apart from stem and root dry weight.

A claim from Growth response of Juvenile Passion Fruit (Passiflora Edulis, F. Falvicarpa) to organic and inorganic fertilizer in South Western Nigeria · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer produced significantly larger growth attributes than organic fertilizer and no fertilizer, apart from stem and root dry weight.

Taxon
Passion FruitPassiflora edulist0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
growth attributese0
Direction
largere0
Qualifier
except for dry weight of stem and roote0
Comparator
organic fertilizer and no fertilizer applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Passion Fruit (Passiflora Edulis, F. Falvicarpa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–76
e0

“except for dry weight of stem and root, inorganic fertilizer produced significantly larger growth attributes than organic fertilizer and no fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–989

Title

Growth response of Juvenile Passion Fruit (Passiflora Edulis, F. Falvicarpa) to organic and inorganic fertilizer in South Western Nigeria

I O Aiyelaagbe; I O Abiola; M A Sadiku; et al. Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science 2007. doi:10.4314/njhs.v10i1.3404

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-310bbde3dfe5ccce9847681d26dd7a1a782327a846ab5a3c5e22083f8842569c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.