Paper · 2014 · LWT

Stability of quercetin derivatives in vacuum impregnated apple slices after drying (microwave vacuum drying, air drying, freeze drying) and storage

Beate Schulze; Eva Maria Hubbermann; Karin Schwarz

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
101
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Microwave vacuum drying (MVD) was investigated for apple slices enriched with quercetin derivatives by vacuum impregnation (VI). Additional freeze drying (FD) and air drying (AD) were conducted. Compared to native apples, the impregnated tissue resulted in higher moisture content, elevation of weight and significant browning, due to the incorporated VI solution. The total quercetin content and quercetin glycoside composition were not affected by MVD and FD. The vacuum conditions protect the polyphenols from oxygen dependent degradation and browning reactions. AD resulted in an average quercetin glycoside loss of 44% and undesirable changes, particularly discoloration. The degradation is caused by both non-enzymatic and enzymatic reactions. The pulsed microwave energy intake improved the drying result in structure and led to a faster drying process of 130 min. The bulk density of MVD apple chips (0.69 g/ml) ranged between 0.33 g/ml for FD and 0.75 g/ml for AD. The final moisture content was the lowest after FD (6.8 g/100 g), followed by 9.0 g/100 g after MVD and 12.7 g/100 g after AD. The shelf life was significantly influenced by storage temperature and time. After 12 month at 20 °C, the total quercetin content decreased by 21%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum impregnation increased moisture content and weight and caused significant browning in apple tissue relative to native apples.

Treatment
impregnated tissuee0
Outcome
moisture contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
native applese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to native apples, the impregnated tissue resulted in higher moisture content, elevation of weight and significant browning, due to the incorporated VI solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Impregnation raised apple tissue weight relative to native apples.

Treatment
impregnated tissuee0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
elevatione0
Comparator
native applese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to native apples, the impregnated tissue resulted in higher moisture content, elevation of weight and significant browning, due to the incorporated VI solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Impregnation caused significant browning in apple tissue relative to native apples.

Treatment
impregnated tissuee0
Outcome
browninge0
Comparator
native applese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to native apples, the impregnated tissue resulted in higher moisture content, elevation of weight and significant browning, due to the incorporated VI solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave vacuum drying and freeze drying left total quercetin content unchanged.

Treatment
MVD and FDe0
Outcome
total quercetin contente0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total quercetin content and quercetin glycoside composition were not affected by MVD and FD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave vacuum drying and freeze drying left quercetin glycoside composition unchanged.

Treatment
MVD and FDe0
Outcome
quercetin glycoside compositione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total quercetin content and quercetin glycoside composition were not affected by MVD and FD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air drying caused average quercetin glycoside loss of 44%.

Treatment
ADe0
Outcome
quercetin glycoside losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AD resulted in an average quercetin glycoside loss of 44% and undesirable changes, particularly discoloration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air drying caused discoloration.

Treatment
ADe0
Outcome
discoloratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AD resulted in an average quercetin glycoside loss of 44% and undesirable changes, particularly discoloration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulsed microwave energy improved chip structure.

Treatment
pulsed microwave energy intakee0
Outcome
drying result in structuree0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pulsed microwave energy intake improved the drying result in structure and led to a faster drying process of 130 min.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulsed microwave energy led to faster drying of 130 min.

Treatment
pulsed microwave energy intakee0
Outcome
drying processe0
Direction
fastere0
Value
130 mine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pulsed microwave energy intake improved the drying result in structure and led to a faster drying process of 130 min.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple chip bulk density after MVD was 0.69 g/ml.

Treatment
MVDe0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Value
0.69 g/mle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bulk density of MVD apple chips (0.69 g/ml) ranged between 0.33 g/ml for FD and 0.75 g/ml for AD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple chip bulk density after FD was 0.33 g/ml.

Treatment
FDe0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Value
0.33 g/mle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bulk density of MVD apple chips (0.69 g/ml) ranged between 0.33 g/ml for FD and 0.75 g/ml for AD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple chip bulk density after AD was 0.75 g/ml.

Treatment
ADe0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Value
0.75 g/mle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bulk density of MVD apple chips (0.69 g/ml) ranged between 0.33 g/ml for FD and 0.75 g/ml for AD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final apple chip moisture content after FD was 6.8 g/100 g.

Treatment
FDe0
Outcome
final moisture contente0
Value
6.8 g/100 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The final moisture content was the lowest after FD (6.8 g/100 g), followed by 9.0 g/100 g after MVD and 12.7 g/100 g after AD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final apple chip moisture content after MVD was 9.0 g/100 g.

Treatment
MVDe0
Outcome
final moisture contente0
Value
9.0 g/100 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The final moisture content was the lowest after FD (6.8 g/100 g), followed by 9.0 g/100 g after MVD and 12.7 g/100 g after AD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final apple chip moisture content after AD was 12.7 g/100 g.

Treatment
ADe0
Outcome
final moisture contente0
Value
12.7 g/100 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The final moisture content was the lowest after FD (6.8 g/100 g), followed by 9.0 g/100 g after MVD and 12.7 g/100 g after AD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage temperature and time significantly influenced shelf life.

Treatment
storage temperature and timee0
Outcome
shelf lifee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shelf life was significantly influenced by storage temperature and time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 12 months at 20 °C, total quercetin content fell 21%.

Outcome
total quercetin contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
21%e0
Qualifier
After 12 month at 20 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 12 month at 20 °C, the total quercetin content decreased by 21%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑

physical treatment · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cold · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

physical treatment · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

processing · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

cold · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 6 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 16 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

processing · soil: physics · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.