Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Fruit Science

Influence of Ultrasound Intensification on the Continuous and Pulsed Microwave during Convective Drying of Apple

Jalal Dehghannya; Elahe Aghazade-Khoie; Maryam Khakbaz Heshmati; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Drying is an essential unit operation in the food industry, with novel technologies introduced day after day. This study aimed to investigate different drying methods of apple using the continuous microwave, pulsed microwave (PM), and convective hot-air (CH) with and without ultrasound (U) pretreatment. Results showed that simultaneous U – PM – CH drying significantly reduced drying time. Shrinkage of the samples decreased when microwave power and pulse ratio were increased. Bulk density reduced by increasing the U duration and pulse ratio. The maximum raise in rehydration (39.35%) was seen in the dried samples pretreated at a higher U duration (30 min). By raising the U time and microwave power, specific energy consumption reduced by 30.05 and 41.36%, respectively. Overall, the U – PM – CH drying enhanced the quality of the dried apples and could be suggested for commercial drying industries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined ultrasound, pulsed microwave and convective drying significantly reduced drying time.

Treatment
simultaneous U – PM – CH dryinge0
Outcome
drying timee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simultaneous U – PM – CH drying significantly reduced drying time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher microwave power decreased shrinkage.

Treatment
microwave powere0
Outcome
Shrinkage of the samplese0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shrinkage of the samples decreased when microwave power and pulse ratio were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher pulse ratio decreased shrinkage.

Treatment
pulse ratioe0
Outcome
Shrinkage of the samplese0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shrinkage of the samples decreased when microwave power and pulse ratio were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer ultrasound duration reduced bulk density.

Treatment
U duratione0
Outcome
Bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulk density reduced by increasing the U duration and pulse ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher pulse ratio reduced bulk density.

Treatment
pulse ratioe0
Outcome
Bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulk density reduced by increasing the U duration and pulse ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty minute ultrasound pretreatment produced the maximum 39.35% rehydration increase.

Treatment
higher U duration (30 min)e0
Outcome
rehydratione0
Direction
maximum raisee0
Value
39.35%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum raise in rehydration (39.35%) was seen in the dried samples pretreated at a higher U duration (30 min)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ultrasound time reduced specific energy consumption by 30.05%.

Treatment
U timee0
Outcome
specific energy consumptione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30.05e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By raising the U time and microwave power, specific energy consumption reduced by 30.05 and 41.36%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing microwave power reduced specific energy consumption by 41.36%.

Treatment
microwave powere0
Outcome
specific energy consumptione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
41.36%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By raising the U time and microwave power, specific energy consumption reduced by 30.05 and 41.36%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined drying enhanced dried apple quality.

Treatment
U – PM – CH dryinge0
Outcome
quality of the dried applese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the U – PM – CH drying enhanced the quality of the dried apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–849 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest combined drying for commercial drying industries.

Outcome
suggested for commercial drying industriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“could be suggested for commercial drying industries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

processing · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.