Paper · 2012 · Acta Agronomica Hungarica

Impact of long-term integrated nutrient management on the availability of calcium, magnesium and sulphur macronutrients and their removal by wheat on a mollisol in North India

T. Sime; Nand Ram

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In a long-term experiment on a mollisol in North India, the availability of Ca, Mg and S nutrients was enhanced under integrated nutrient management (INM) conditions, but depleted in the case of continuous rice-wheat-cowpea cropping for 28 years without nutrient input (control), suggesting the need for the regular estimation of these macronutrients in soils under intensive cropping. The soil was still able to supply crop needs for Ca and Mg, but the soil became S-deficient (8.9 mg kg −1 ) when S-free diammonium phosphate (DAP) fertilizer was applied. Its availability increased 5-fold (45.3 mg kg −1 ) after the application of S-containing single superphosphate (SSP) fertilizer and improved further when this was combined with farmyard manure (FYM) in an INM system. The wheat response to S was 0.36 and 0.45 t ha −1 for the grain and straw yields, respectively. The highest removal of Ca, Mg and S was observed with INM (21.36, 27.52 and 13.38 kg ha −1 , respectively) and the lowest in the unfertilized control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management enhanced Ca, Mg and S availability.

Treatment
integrated nutrient management (INM)e0
Outcome
availability of Ca, Mg and S nutrientse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the availability of Ca, Mg and S nutrients was enhanced under integrated nutrient management (INM) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–165 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-eight years without nutrient input depleted Ca, Mg and S availability.

Treatment
continuous rice-wheat-cowpea cropping for 28 years without nutrient inpute0
Outcome
Ca, Mg and S nutrientse1
Direction
depletede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“depleted in the case of continuous rice-wheat-cowpea cropping for 28 years without nutrient input (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“the availability of Ca, Mg and S nutrients was enhanced under integrated nutrient management (INM) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-free DAP left the soil S-deficient at 8.9 mg kg −1.

Treatment
S-free diammonium phosphate (DAP) fertilizere0
Outcome
soil became S-deficiente0
Direction
S-deficiente0
Value
8.9 mg kg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil became S-deficient (8.9 mg kg −1 ) when S-free diammonium phosphate (DAP) fertilizer was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP increased S availability fivefold to 45.3 mg kg −1.

Treatment
S-containing single superphosphate (SSP) fertilizere0
Outcome
availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
45.3 mg kg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Its availability increased 5-fold (45.3 mg kg −1 ) after the application of S-containing single superphosphate (SSP) fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding FYM to SSP improved S availability further.

Treatment
farmyard manure (FYM)e0
Outcome
availabilitye1
Direction
improved furthere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved further when this was combined with farmyard manure (FYM) in an INM system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“the availability of Ca, Mg and S nutrients was enhanced under integrated nutrient management (INM) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield response to S was 0.36 t ha −1.

Treatment
Se0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
responsee0
Value
0.36e0
Qualifier
t ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat response to S was 0.36 and 0.45 t ha −1 for the grain and straw yields, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw yield response to S was 0.45 t ha −1.

Treatment
Se0
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Direction
responsee0
Value
0.45 t ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat response to S was 0.36 and 0.45 t ha −1 for the grain and straw yields, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INM had the highest Ca, Mg and S removal.

Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
removal of Ca, Mg and Se0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest removal of Ca, Mg and S was observed with INM (21.36, 27.52 and 13.38 kg ha −1 , respectively) and the lowest in the unfertilized control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

rotation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 25 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.