Paper · 1992 · Pesticide Science

Effects of some nonionic polyoxyethylene surfactants on uptake of ethirimol and diclobutrazol from suspension formulations applied to wheat leaves

Peter J. Holloway; Wilson W.‐C. Wong; Hazel J. Partridge; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
42
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The influence of a number of commercial nonionic polyoxyethylene surfactants on the foliar penetration and movement of two systemic fungicides, ethirimol and diclobutrazol, was studied in outdoor‐grown wheat plants at different growth stages and post‐treatment temperatures in two consecutive growing seasons. Both fungicides were applied as ca 0·2 μl droplets of aqueous suspension formulations containing 0·5 g litre −1 of 14 C‐labelled active ingredient; surfactants were added to these suspensions at concentrations ranging from 0·2‐10 g litre −1 . To achieve optimum uptake of each fungicide the use of surfactants with different physicochemical properties was required. For diclobutrazol, a lipophilic compound, uptake of radiolabel was best with surfactants of low mean molar ethylene oxide (E) content (5‐6) but it was necessary to use concentrations of ca 5 g litre −1 to attain this. The surfactant threshold concentration for uptake enhancement of radiolabel from ethirimol formulations (< 2 g litre −1 ) was much lower than that for diclobutrazol but surfactants with E contents > 10 induced the greatest amount of uptake. For both fungicides, surfactants with an aliphatic alcohol hydrophobe were generally more efficient in promoting their uptake than those with a nonylphenol moiety. The sorbitan‐based surfactant ‘Tween 20’ proved to be an effective adjuvant only for the ethirimol formulation; the uptake enhancing properties of the block copolymer ‘Synperonic PE/F68’ were weak. Uptake performance could not be related to the spreading properties of the respective formulations on the wheat leaf surface or to differences in solubilisation of the two fungicides by the surfactants. Although surfactants could substantially increase the amount of acropetal transport of radiolabel from both fungicides, none of those tested specifically promoted it; a constant proportion of the radioactive dose absorbed by a treated leaf was usually exported away from the site of application. The results are discussed in the light of current theories about the mode of action of surfactants as spray adjuvants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal uptake required surfactants with different properties for the two fungicides.

Outcome
optimum uptakee0
Qualifier
different physicochemical propertiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To achieve optimum uptake of each fungicide the use of surfactants with different physicochemical properties was required.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclobutrazol uptake was best with low-E surfactants at about 5 g per litre.

Treatment
surfactants of low mean molar ethylene oxide (E) content (5‐6)e0
Outcome
uptake of radiolabele0
Direction
beste0
Value
ca 5 g litre −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For diclobutrazol, a lipophilic compound, uptake of radiolabel was best with surfactants of low mean molar ethylene oxide (E) content (5‐6) but it was necessary to use concentrations of ca 5 g litre −1 to attain this.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethirimol uptake enhancement had a lower surfactant threshold than diclobutrazol.

Outcome
surfactant threshold concentration for uptake enhancement of radiolabele0
Direction
much lowere0
Value
< 2 g litre −1e0
Comparator
diclobutrazole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The surfactant threshold concentration for uptake enhancement of radiolabel from ethirimol formulations (< 2 g litre −1 ) was much lower than that for diclobutrazol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surfactants with E contents above 10 induced the greatest ethirimol uptake.

Treatment
surfactants with E contents > 10e0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“surfactants with E contents > 10 induced the greatest amount of uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aliphatic alcohol surfactants generally promoted uptake more efficiently than nonylphenol surfactants.

Treatment
surfactants with an aliphatic alcohol hydrophobee0
Outcome
their uptakee0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
those with a nonylphenol moietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For both fungicides, surfactants with an aliphatic alcohol hydrophobe were generally more efficient in promoting their uptake than those with a nonylphenol moiety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tween 20 enhanced uptake only from the ethirimol formulation.

Treatment
‘Tween 20’e0
Outcome
effective adjuvante0
Qualifier
only for the ethirimol formulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sorbitan‐based surfactant ‘Tween 20’ proved to be an effective adjuvant only for the ethirimol formulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synperonic PE/F68 had weak uptake enhancement.

Treatment
‘Synperonic PE/F68’e0
Outcome
uptake enhancing propertiese0
Direction
weake0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the uptake enhancing properties of the block copolymer ‘Synperonic PE/F68’ were weak.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake performance was unrelated to formulation spreading on wheat leaves.

Treatment
spreading properties of the respective formulationse0
Outcome
Uptake performancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake performance could not be related to the spreading properties of the respective formulations on the wheat leaf surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1630 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake performance was unrelated to surfactant solubilisation of the fungicides.

Treatment
differences in solubilisation of the two fungicides by the surfactantse0
Outcome
Uptake performancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake performance could not be related to the spreading properties of the respective formulations on the wheat leaf surface or to differences in solubilisation of the two fungicides by the surfactants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surfactants substantially increased acropetal transport of radiolabel.

Treatment
surfactantse0
Outcome
amount of acropetal transport of radiolabele0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“surfactants could substantially increase the amount of acropetal transport of radiolabel from both fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1827 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tested surfactant specifically promoted acropetal transport.

Outcome
constant proportion of the radioactive dose absorbed by a treated leaf was usually exported away from the site of applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of those tested specifically promoted it; a constant proportion of the radioactive dose absorbed by a treated leaf was usually exported away from the site of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–2004 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑

surfactant · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

polysorbate 20 · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

oxirane · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.