Paper · 2019 · Frontiers in Plant Science

The Timing of Application and Inclusion of a Surfactant Are Important for Absorption and Translocation of Foliar Phosphoric Acid by Wheat Leaves

Courtney A. E. Peirce; Therese M. McBeath; Craig Priest; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Foliar applied phosphorus has the potential to provide a more tactical approach to phosphorus (P) fertilisation that could enhance P use efficiency if effective. The aims of this study were to investigate the influence of adjuvant choice and application timing of foliar applied phosphoric acid on leaf wettability, foliar uptake, translocation and grain yield of wheat plants. We measured the contact angles of water and fertilisers on wheat leaves, and the uptake, translocation and wheat yield response to isotopically-labelled phosphoric acid in combination with five different adjuvants when foliar-applied to wheat at either early tillering or flag leaf emergence. There was high foliar uptake of phosphoric acid in combination with all adjuvants that contained a surfactant but only one treatment resulted in a 12% increase in grain yield and two treatments resulted in a decrease in grain yield. Despite the wettability of all foliar fertilisers being markedly different, foliar uptake was similar for all treatments that contained a surfactant. The translocation of phosphorus from foliar sources was higher when applied at a later growth stage than when applied at tillering despite the leaf surface properties that affect wettability being similar across all leaves at both growth stages. Both the timing of foliar application and the inclusion of a surfactant in the formulation are important for absorption and translocation of phosphoric acid by wheat leaves, however high foliar uptake and translocation will not always translate to a yield increase.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar uptake of phosphoric acid was high with all adjuvants that contained a surfactant.

Treatment
phosphoric acid in combination with all adjuvants that contained a surfactante2
Outcome
foliar uptakee2
Direction
highe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“when foliar-applied to wheat at either early tillering or flag leaf emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was high foliar uptake of phosphoric acid in combination with all adjuvants that contained a surfactant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only one foliar treatment increased wheat grain yield by 12%.

Treatment
only one treatmente2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
12%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“when foliar-applied to wheat at either early tillering or flag leaf emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“only one treatment resulted in a 12% increase in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two foliar treatments decreased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
two treatmentse2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“when foliar-applied to wheat at either early tillering or flag leaf emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“two treatments resulted in a decrease in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar uptake was similar for all treatments that contained a surfactant.

Treatment
all treatments that contained a surfactante2
Outcome
foliar uptakee2
Direction
similare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“when foliar-applied to wheat at either early tillering or flag leaf emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“foliar uptake was similar for all treatments that contained a surfactant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wettability of the foliar fertilisers was markedly different.

Treatment
all foliar fertiliserse2
Outcome
wettabilitye2
Direction
markedly differente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“when foliar-applied to wheat at either early tillering or flag leaf emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“Despite the wettability of all foliar fertilisers being markedly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus translocation from foliar sources was higher when applied at a later growth stage than when applied at tillering.

Treatment
applied at a later growth stagee2
Outcome
translocation of phosphorus from foliar sourcese2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
applied at tilleringe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“when foliar-applied to wheat at either early tillering or flag leaf emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“The translocation of phosphorus from foliar sources was higher when applied at a later growth stage than when applied at tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1184 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf surface properties that affect wettability were similar across all leaves at both growth stages.

Outcome
leaf surface properties that affect wettabilitye2
Qualifier
similar across all leaves at both growth stagese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“when foliar-applied to wheat at either early tillering or flag leaf emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“despite the leaf surface properties that affect wettability being similar across all leaves at both growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1298 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timing of foliar application and inclusion of a surfactant are important for absorption and translocation of phosphoric acid in wheat leaves.

Treatment
the timing of foliar applicatione2
Outcome
absorption and translocation of phosphoric acide2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Both the timing of foliar application and the inclusion of a surfactant in the formulation are important for absorption and translocation of phosphoric acid by wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1472 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High foliar uptake and translocation of phosphoric acid will not always translate to a wheat yield increase.

Compound
phosphoric acide3
Outcome
yield increasee2
Direction
not alwayse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“when foliar-applied to wheat at either early tillering or flag leaf emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–669 · show in text ↑
e2

“however high foliar uptake and translocation will not always translate to a yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1564 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was high foliar uptake of phosphoric acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–718 · show in text ↑

adjuvant · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

surfactant · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

phosphoric acid · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

stage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.