Abstract
An experiment was conducted at Grdarasha Agriculture Research Station of Agricultural Engineering Sciences College / Salahaddin University- Erbil, to investigate the uptake of certain nutrients in wheat. A factorial experiment of (2 x 4 x 2) was carried out using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) using three replications. The study involved two wheat varieties (Hawler 2 and Hawler 4), and four micronutrient treatments F1 = control, F2 = iron (Fe) applied at 5 kg Fe ha-1 in the form of FeSO4.7H2O, F3 = Zinc applied at 5 kg Zn ha-1 in the form of ZnSO4.7H2O and F4 = Combination of Fe and Zn (5 kg Fe + 5 Kg Zn ha-1). the treatments were applied at two growth stages tillering (GS Z25) and booting (GS Z45). The results showed that Hawler 2 variety exhibited a significantly responded to the uptake of most elements. There were no significant differences in nutrients uptake for the growth stages except iron and phosphorous in grains which increased at the tillering stages and phosphorous in the straw, which increased at the botting stages. Zinc Applying enhanced the uptakes of most elements in both straw and grains excluding potassium and iron in the grains which increased due to of iron application, while the combination of iron and zinc significantly increased the uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus in the wheat grain.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Hawler 2 differed significantly in uptake of most elements.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Hawler 2e0
- Outcome
- uptake of most elementse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“The results showed that Hawler 2 variety exhibited a significantly responded to the uptake of most elements.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient uptake generally did not differ significantly between growth stages.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- growth stagese0
- Outcome
- nutrients uptakee0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“There were no significant differences in nutrients uptake for the growth stages except iron and phosphorous in grains which increased at the tillering stages and phosphorous in the straw, which increased at the botting stages.”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain iron uptake increased at tillering.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- tillering stagese0
- Outcome
- iron and phosphorous in grainse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“iron and phosphorous in grains which increased at the tillering stages”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain phosphorous uptake increased at tillering.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- tillering stagese0
- Outcome
- phosphorous in grainse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“iron and phosphorous in grains which increased at the tillering stages”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw phosphorous uptake increased at booting.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- botting stagese0
- Outcome
- phosphorous in the strawe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“phosphorous in the straw, which increased at the botting stages”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc application enhanced uptake of most elements in straw and grains.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Zinc Applyinge0
- Outcome
- uptakes of most elements in both straw and grainse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Qualifier
- excluding potassium and iron in the grainse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“Zinc Applying enhanced the uptakes of most elements in both straw and grains excluding potassium and iron in the grains”
Claim · model-written summary
Iron application increased grain potassium and iron uptake.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- iron applicatione0
- Outcome
- potassium and iron in the grainse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“potassium and iron in the grains which increased due to of iron application”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined iron and zinc significantly increased grain nitrogen uptake.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- combination of iron and zince0
- Outcome
- uptake of nitrogene0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“the combination of iron and zinc significantly increased the uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus in the wheat grain.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined iron and zinc significantly increased grain phosphorus uptake.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- combination of iron and zince0
- Outcome
- uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus in the wheat graine0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“the combination of iron and zinc significantly increased the uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus in the wheat grain.”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
70 papers more in this group
See all 74 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
376 papers more in this group
See all 380 papers →stage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
141 papers more in this group
See all 145 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.