Paper · 2017 · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)

Foliar fertilisation of wheat plants with phosphorus

Peirce, Courtney Anna Emelia

20
claims
36
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is an important macronutrient essential for plant growth. Broadacre cropping often requires additional inputs of mineral P fertiliser to grow profitable crops. Current management practice is to apply all fertiliser P at sowing. If the conditions under which foliar applied P could reliably increase grain yield are met, foliar application of P could be used as an in-season management strategy to top up P supply of wheat. This could be of significant benefit to farmers to reduce risk in regions with variable climate. Through a series of plant experiments under controlled environmental conditions, this thesis investigated plant physiological (leaf wettability and growth stage) and foliar formulation (form of P, P concentration, adjuvant choice and pH) factors affecting the efficacy of foliar P uptake and translocation. The first experiment investigated the influence of leaf side and its corresponding wettability on the uptake and translocation of foliar applied P. The second and third experiments examined the effect of adjuvants on the wettability of wheat leaves and the associated uptake and translocation of foliar applied P (from phosphoric acid) after a few days and when harvested at maturity. The last experiment investigated the effect of foliar formulations differing in pH, P source and adjuvant, on wheat growth and uptake and translocation of P. A number of methods and techniques were used throughout the thesis. Investigations on the effect of leaf morphology on uptake and wettability involved the use scanning electron microscopy. Wettability of leaves by both water and fertilisers was characterised using contact angle measurements with a combination of static, advancing, receding and spreading contact angles over time measured. Uptake and translocation of the foliar applied fertilisers was quantified through the use of dual or single labelling isotopic tracer techniques. Absorption and subsequent translocation of foliar applied P was higher for the adaxial (upper) leaf side despite it being more difficult to wet than the abaxial (lower) side. When the foliar P concentration was increased the contribution of foliar P to plant P uptake increased but was translocated away from the site of application at a lower efficiency, likely due to the higher scorch experienced by the leaves at higher concentrations. Importantly, the morphology of the wheat leaf influenced both the retention and contact angle of the fertiliser on the leaf surface and the uptake and subsequent translocation of the foliar applied P. Foliar application of P at ear emergence had higher absorption and subsequent translocation of P than when applied at anthesis. The inclusion of a surfactant in the foliar P formulation is essential because wheat leaves are difficult to wet. Application of foliar P without a surfactant resulted in lower levels of fertiliser retention on leaves. When applied with phosphoric acid the choice of adjuvant affected the spreading dynamics and leaf wetting area but did not affect the foliar uptake of P. The yield response to foliar applied phosphoric acid was inconsistent despite the uptake and translocation being the same for all formulations that included a surfactant. The timing of application was more important than surfactant choice with higher translocation of foliar applied P when it was applied at flag leaf emergence compared to tillering. While increases in P uptake by wheat plants with foliar application of phosphoric acid were consistent, increases in plant growth and yield were not. Although foliar P from phosphoric acid was absorbed, only a small proportion was translocated. Specific combinations of adjuvant and P sources other than phosphoric acid were able to increase both plant P uptake and peak biomass. These foliar fertilisers ranged in associated cations (potassium, sodium and ammonium phosphates) and pH (2.2, 4.3, 6.5 and 8.7). Increases in plant P uptake did not always translate to biomass increases with translocation of foliar applied P playing a more crucial role than foliar uptake of P. This thesis has made important progress in our understanding of the effects of wheat leaf morphology, leaf wettability and crop phenology on the recovery of foliar applied P fertilisers in wheat plants. The processes of retention, absorption and translocation of foliar-applied P have proven important for inducing positive biomass and grain yield responses and this has been achieved using several foliar P formulations. However, a single characteristic of the formulation that optimises these processes has not been identified and as a result prediction of the exact scenarios when positive responses of wheat to foliar-applied P should occur has not been achieved. It appears that there is some plasticity in the response by wheat plants to additional P supplied via the leaves and some remaining uncertainty about the effects of scorch that are influencing the predictability of the response. Field validation is required to ascertain whether the positive response found in controlled experiments can be replicated when environmental conditions are more varied and unpredictable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar P absorption and translocation were higher on the upper than lower wheat leaf side.

Treatment
adaxial (upper) leaf sidee0
Outcome
Absorption and subsequent translocation of foliar applied Pe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
abaxial (lower) sidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Absorption and subsequent translocation of foliar applied P was higher for the adaxial (upper) leaf side despite it being more difficult to wet than the abaxial (lower) side.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2096 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing foliar P concentration increased the contribution of foliar P to wheat P uptake.

Treatment
foliar P concentratione0
Outcome
contribution of foliar P to plant P uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the foliar P concentration was increased the contribution of foliar P to plant P uptake increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2097–2199 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing foliar P concentration lowered translocation efficiency away from the application site.

Treatment
foliar P concentratione0
Outcome
translocated away from the site of applicatione0
Direction
lower efficiencye0
Qualifier
likely due to the higher scorche0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the foliar P concentration was increased the contribution of foliar P to plant P uptake increased but was translocated away from the site of application at a lower efficiency, likely due to the higher scorch experienced by the leaves at higher concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2097–2361 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat leaf morphology influenced fertilizer retention and contact angle on the leaf surface.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
retention and contact angle of the fertilisere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the morphology of the wheat leaf influenced both the retention and contact angle of the fertiliser on the leaf surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2375–2493 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat leaf morphology influenced uptake and translocation of foliar P.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
uptake and subsequent translocation of the foliar applied Pe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the morphology of the wheat leaf influenced both the retention and contact angle of the fertiliser on the leaf surface and the uptake and subsequent translocation of the foliar applied P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2375–2562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar P applied at ear emergence had higher absorption and translocation than at anthesis.

Treatment
ear emergencee0
Outcome
absorption and subsequent translocation of Pe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
anthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of P at ear emergence had higher absorption and subsequent translocation of P than when applied at anthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2563–2690 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar P without surfactant produced lower fertilizer retention on wheat leaves.

Treatment
foliar P without a surfactante0
Outcome
fertiliser retention on leavese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of foliar P without a surfactant resulted in lower levels of fertiliser retention on leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2805–2909 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With phosphoric acid, adjuvant choice affected spreading dynamics and leaf wetting area.

Treatment
choice of adjuvante0
Outcome
spreading dynamics and leaf wetting areae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied with phosphoric acid the choice of adjuvant affected the spreading dynamics and leaf wetting area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2910–3020 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With phosphoric acid, adjuvant choice did not affect foliar P uptake.

Treatment
choice of adjuvante0
Outcome
foliar uptake of Pe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“choice of adjuvant affected the spreading dynamics and leaf wetting area but did not affect the foliar uptake of P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3063 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The grain yield response to foliar phosphoric acid was inconsistent.

Treatment
foliar applied phosphoric acide0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Qualifier
inconsistente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response to foliar applied phosphoric acid was inconsistent despite the uptake and translocation being the same for all formulations that included a surfactant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3064–3234 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake and translocation were the same across surfactant-containing foliar P formulations.

Treatment
formulations that included a surfactante0
Outcome
uptake and translocatione0
Direction
the samee0
Comparator
all formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uptake and translocation being the same for all formulations that included a surfactant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3146–3234 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar P applied at flag leaf emergence had higher translocation than at tillering.

Treatment
flag leaf emergencee0
Outcome
translocation of foliar applied Pe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
tilleringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher translocation of foliar applied P when it was applied at flag leaf emergence compared to tillering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3308–3414 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphoric acid consistently increased wheat P uptake.

Treatment
foliar application of phosphoric acide0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in P uptake by wheat plants with foliar application of phosphoric acid were consistent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3421–3517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphoric acid did not consistently increase plant growth and yield.

Treatment
foliar application of phosphoric acide0
Outcome
plant growth and yielde0
Direction
note0
Qualifier
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While increases in P uptake by wheat plants with foliar application of phosphoric acid were consistent, increases in plant growth and yield were not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3415–3564 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only a small proportion of absorbed foliar phosphoric acid P was translocated.

Outcome
foliar P from phosphoric acide0
Value
small proportione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although foliar P from phosphoric acid was absorbed, only a small proportion was translocated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3565–3659 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific adjuvant and non-phosphoric-acid P source combinations increased wheat P uptake.

Treatment
combinations of adjuvant and P sources other than phosphoric acide0
Outcome
plant P uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
phosphoric acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Specific combinations of adjuvant and P sources other than phosphoric acid were able to increase both plant P uptake and peak biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3660–3794 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific adjuvant and non-phosphoric-acid P source combinations increased wheat peak biomass.

Treatment
combinations of adjuvant and P sources other than phosphoric acide0
Outcome
peak biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
phosphoric acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Specific combinations of adjuvant and P sources other than phosphoric acid were able to increase both plant P uptake and peak biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3660–3794 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased wheat P uptake did not always translate into increased biomass.

Organ / stage
plante0
Outcome
biomass increasese0
Direction
did not always translatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in plant P uptake did not always translate to biomass increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3925–3998 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Translocation of foliar P played a more crucial role than uptake in wheat biomass response.

Treatment
foliar applied Pe0
Outcome
translocation of foliar applied Pe0
Direction
more cruciale0
Comparator
foliar uptake of Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“translocation of foliar applied P playing a more crucial role than foliar uptake of P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4004–4090 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several foliar P formulations achieved positive wheat biomass and grain yield responses through retention, absorption and translocation.

Treatment
several foliar P formulationse0
Outcome
positive biomass and grain yield responsese0
Qualifier
retention, absorption and translocation of foliar-applied Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The processes of retention, absorption and translocation of foliar-applied P have proven important for inducing positive biomass and grain yield responses and this has been achieved using several foliar P formulations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4294–4512 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 · show in text ↑

adjuvant · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

adjuvant · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

surfactant · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

phosphoric acid · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.