Paper · 2008 · Soil Science

GYPSUM AMENDMENT AND EXCHANGEABLE CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM EFFECTS ON PLANT NUTRITION UNDER CONDITIONS OF INTENSIVE NUTRIENT EXTRACTION

Nerilde Favaretto; L. Darrell Norton; Sylvie M. Brouder; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In general, increasing the concentration of one cation species in soil solution can decrease levels of other cations in plants. It is not clear whether adjusting soil cation ratios or adding gypsum will improve plant growth. We studied the effect of adding gypsum to unleached soil, and the effect of changing soil-exchangeable Ca/Mg ratios on corn root and shoot growth and nutrient concentrations. Soil-exchangeable Ca/Mg ratios (8.0, 4.9, 1.8, 0.7, and 0.5) were obtained by leaching soil with Ca and Mg chloride, followed by leaching with Ca and Mg sulfate to remove chloride. An unleached soil treated with gypsum and an untreated control soil were also included. Corn plants were grown for 23 days in a replicated greenhouse experiment. Exchangeable Ca/Mg ratios did not substantially affect root and shoot growth in the leached soils, nor did gypsum addition to the unleached soil. However, growth in the leached soils was less than that in the unleached soils, probably because of removal of K in the leaching process. Shoots from plants from treatments with lower leached Ca/Mg ratios had less Ca and more Mg but showed no consistent changes in K. Addition of gypsum to unleached soil decreased P, increased K and Ca, and did not affect N and Mg concentrations in shoots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable Ca/Mg ratios did not substantially affect corn root and shoot growth.

Treatment
Exchangeable Ca/Mg ratiose0
Outcome
root and shoot growthe0
Direction
did not substantially affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exchangeable Ca/Mg ratios did not substantially affect root and shoot growth in the leached soils, nor did gypsum addition to the unleached soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn root and shoot growth and nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum addition did not substantially affect corn root and shoot growth.

Treatment
gypsum additione0
Outcome
root and shoot growthe0
Direction
did not substantially affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exchangeable Ca/Mg ratios did not substantially affect root and shoot growth in the leached soils, nor did gypsum addition to the unleached soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn root and shoot growth and nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn growth was lower in leached than unleached soils.

Treatment
leached soilse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
less thane0
Comparator
unleached soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, growth in the leached soils was less than that in the unleached soils, probably because of removal of K in the leaching process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn root and shoot growth and nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–399 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower leached Ca/Mg ratios were associated with less shoot Ca.

Treatment
lower leached Ca/Mg ratiose0
Outcome
Cae0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoots from plants from treatments with lower leached Ca/Mg ratios had less Ca and more Mg but showed no consistent changes in K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn root and shoot growth and nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–399 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower leached Ca/Mg ratios were associated with more shoot Mg.

Treatment
lower leached Ca/Mg ratiose0
Outcome
Mge0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoots from plants from treatments with lower leached Ca/Mg ratios had less Ca and more Mg but showed no consistent changes in K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn root and shoot growth and nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–399 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower leached Ca/Mg ratios showed no consistent changes in shoot K.

Treatment
lower leached Ca/Mg ratiose0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
no consistent changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoots from plants from treatments with lower leached Ca/Mg ratios had less Ca and more Mg but showed no consistent changes in K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn root and shoot growth and nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum addition decreased shoot P.

Treatment
Addition of gypsum to unleached soile0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of gypsum to unleached soil decreased P, increased K and Ca, and did not affect N and Mg concentrations in shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn root and shoot growth and nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum addition increased shoot K and Ca.

Treatment
Addition of gypsum to unleached soile0
Outcome
K and Cae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of gypsum to unleached soil decreased P, increased K and Ca, and did not affect N and Mg concentrations in shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn root and shoot growth and nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum addition did not affect shoot N and Mg.

Treatment
Addition of gypsum to unleached soile0
Outcome
N and Mg concentrations in shootse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of gypsum to unleached soil decreased P, increased K and Ca, and did not affect N and Mg concentrations in shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn root and shoot growth and nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–399 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

calcium atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

33 papers: 25 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

lime · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

56 papers: 41 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 71 positive, 24 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.