Paper · 2006 · Fruits

Influence of pruning intensity on light penetration and leaf physiology in high-density orchards of mango trees

Ram Roshan Sharma; Room Singh; Desh Beer Singh

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Introduction. High–density orchards of ‘Amrapali’ mango trees become overcrowded and show progressive decline in yield after 14–15 years of planting; hence, trees require pruning for sustainable production. Reduction in yield in such orchards is due to poor light interception and a low photosynthetic rate, which influence vegetative growth, flower initiation, fruit set and, thereby, the fruit yield. Hence, to help design a tree canopy for optimum plant growth and yield, we studied the effect of pruning on light interception and on different leaf physiological parameters of ‘Amrapali’ mango trees under high density. Materials and methods. Sixteen-year-old trees of an ‘Amrapali’ mango high-density orchard were subjected to tipping and light, moderate and heavy pruning; un-pruned trees were used as control. The available photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) and leaf physiological parameters such as rate of photosynthesis, specific leaf weight (SLW) and leaf chlorophyll (Chl) content were measured in pruned and un-pruned tree canopies, following standard procedures. Results and discussion. The percent available PPF was greater in all pruned tree canopies than in un-pruned tree canopies; this could be due to tree openness caused by pruning. The light interception was lower at the lowest height of the tree canopy, probably because the center of the tree canopy was partially blocked by new growth or criss-cross branches. The rate of photosynthesis was greater in leaves that developed in pruned tree canopies than in those developed in un-pruned tree canopies, although there was no difference in SLW; this could be due to better light interception in pruned trees. In contrast, total leaf chlorophyll content was the highest in leaves that developed in un-pruned and tipped tree canopies; this may be due to increased shade owing to overlapping or crowding of tree canopies in these trees, indicating that mango leaves that developed in shade appeared to be more physiologically efficient at synthesizing chlorophyll than leaves that grew in the sun or on the sunny side. Conclusions. The studies indicated that pruning ‘Amrapali’ mango trees by removing about 10–15 cm of the top from old branches improves light penetration, which influences the leaf physiology considerably. Hence, it would be useful for designing high-density ‘Amrapali’ mango orchards to maximize productivity, although it requires additional studies to recommend a particular pruning intensity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruned mango canopies had greater percent available photosynthetic photon flux than un-pruned canopies.

Treatment
pruned tree canopiese1
Outcome
percent available PPFe1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
un-pruned tree canopiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-density orchards of mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The percent available PPF was greater in all pruned tree canopies than in un-pruned tree canopies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light interception was lower at the lowest height of the mango tree canopy.

Organ / stage
lowest height of the tree canopye2
Outcome
light interceptione2
Direction
lowere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-density orchards of mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
e2

“The light interception was lower at the lowest height of the tree canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of photosynthesis was greater in mango leaves developed in pruned canopies than in leaves from un-pruned canopies.

Organ / stage
leavese3
Treatment
pruned tree canopiese3
Outcome
rate of photosynthesise3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
un-pruned tree canopiese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-density orchards of mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“The rate of photosynthesis was greater in leaves that developed in pruned tree canopies than in those developed in un-pruned tree canopies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf weight did not differ between pruned and un-pruned mango canopies.

Treatment
pruned tree canopiese3
Outcome
SLWe4
Direction
no differencee4
Comparator
un-pruned tree canopiese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-density orchards of mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“The rate of photosynthesis was greater in leaves that developed in pruned tree canopies than in those developed in un-pruned tree canopies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1572 · show in text ↑
e4

“although there was no difference in SLW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1613 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf chlorophyll content was highest in leaves developed in un-pruned and tipped mango canopies.

Organ / stage
leavese5
Treatment
un-pruned and tipped tree canopiese5
Outcome
total leaf chlorophyll contente5
Direction
higheste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-density orchards of mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
e5

“In contrast, total leaf chlorophyll content was the highest in leaves that developed in un-pruned and tipped tree canopies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1801 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango leaves developed in shade may be more efficient at synthesizing chlorophyll than sun leaves.

Treatment
increased shadee7
Outcome
more physiologically efficient at synthesizing chlorophylle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-density orchards of mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
e6

“mango leaves that developed in shade appeared to be more physiologically efficient at synthesizing chlorophyll than leaves that grew in the sun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–2063 · show in text ↑
e7

“this may be due to increased shade owing to overlapping or crowding of tree canopies in these trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing about 10–15 cm of the top from old branches improves light penetration in mango trees.

Treatment
removing about 10–15 cm of the top from old branchese7
Outcome
light penetratione7
Direction
improvese7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-density orchards of mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
e7

“pruning ‘Amrapali’ mango trees by removing about 10–15 cm of the top from old branches improves light penetration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2126–2239 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High-density ‘Amrapali’ mango orchards pruned as described would be useful to maximize productivity.

Outcome
maximize productivitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-density orchards of mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
e7

“it would be useful for designing high-density ‘Amrapali’ mango orchards to maximize productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2299–2395 · show in text ↑

pruning · physiology: photosynthesis · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pruning · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.