Paper · 2011 · 2011 Second International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering

Effects of monosodium glutamate wastewater on yield and quality of tomato fruit, SOD, CAT, POD activities and MDA content in tomato leaves

Gui-Xiao La; Guo-shun Liu; Fang Ping

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A medium culture experiment of tomato using edible fungi culture medium waste as the main component of culture medium was conducted to study the effects of different nutrient solutions, i.e. monosodium glutamate wastewater (MGW), inorganic nutrient solution (INS) and water, on the yield, fruit quality, activities of enzymes which protected against active oxygen and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in leaves on 50 d and 75 d after transplanted. The yield of MGW treatment was the highest among the three treatments. There was significant difference in yield between MGW and water treatment, while the yield of MGW increased 36.62% compared with that of INS treatment. Except the VC and nitrate content in fruit, the soluble protein content and carobohydrate content increased, furthermore, the fruit flavor was improved, compared with that of INS treatment. Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) in MGW and INS treatment were both higher than that of water treatment, while MDA content was in reverse. However, there was no significant difference showed in the activities of SOD, CAT, POD between MGW and INS treatments except that SOD activity in MGW treatment at 75 day was higher than that of INS treatment. It was obvious that MGW used as nutrition solution in substrate culture can increase the yield and improve some items of quality, which also would not damage the physiology as some other wastewater during the growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MGW produced the highest tomato yield among three treatments.

Treatment
MGWe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
the three treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of MGW treatment was the highest among the three treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield and quality of tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MGW yield differed significantly from water treatment.

Treatment
MGWe0
Outcome
yielde0
Comparator
water treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was significant difference in yield between MGW and water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield and quality of tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MGW increased yield 36.62% versus INS.

Treatment
MGWe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.62%e0
Comparator
INS treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of MGW increased 36.62% compared with that of INS treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield and quality of tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MGW increased fruit soluble protein and carbohydrate content relative to INS.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
MGWe1
Outcome
soluble protein content and carobohydrate contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
INS treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soluble protein content and carobohydrate content increased, furthermore, the fruit flavor was improved, compared with that of INS treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield and quality of tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“A medium culture experiment of tomato using edible fungi culture medium waste as the main component of culture medium was conducted to study the effects of different nutrient solutions, i.e. monosodium glutamate wastewater (MGW), inorganic nutrient solution (INS) and water, on the yield, fruit quality, activities of enzymes which protected against active oxygen and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in leaves on 50 d and 75 d after transplanted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MGW improved fruit flavor relative to INS.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
MGWe1
Outcome
fruit flavore0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
INS treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fruit flavor was improved, compared with that of INS treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield and quality of tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“A medium culture experiment of tomato using edible fungi culture medium waste as the main component of culture medium was conducted to study the effects of different nutrient solutions, i.e. monosodium glutamate wastewater (MGW), inorganic nutrient solution (INS) and water, on the yield, fruit quality, activities of enzymes which protected against active oxygen and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in leaves on 50 d and 75 d after transplanted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MGW and INS had higher SOD, CAT and POD activities than water.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
MGW and INS treatmente0
Outcome
Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
water treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) in MGW and INS treatment were both higher than that of water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield and quality of tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“A medium culture experiment of tomato using edible fungi culture medium waste as the main component of culture medium was conducted to study the effects of different nutrient solutions, i.e. monosodium glutamate wastewater (MGW), inorganic nutrient solution (INS) and water, on the yield, fruit quality, activities of enzymes which protected against active oxygen and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in leaves on 50 d and 75 d after transplanted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MGW and INS had lower MDA than water.

Organ / stage
leavese2
Treatment
MGW and INS treatmente1
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Comparator
water treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while MDA content was in reverse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield and quality of tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) in MGW and INS treatment were both higher than that of water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1007 · show in text ↑
e2

“A medium culture experiment of tomato using edible fungi culture medium waste as the main component of culture medium was conducted to study the effects of different nutrient solutions, i.e. monosodium glutamate wastewater (MGW), inorganic nutrient solution (INS) and water, on the yield, fruit quality, activities of enzymes which protected against active oxygen and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in leaves on 50 d and 75 d after transplanted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD, CAT and POD activities generally did not differ significantly between MGW and INS.

Treatment
MGWe0
Outcome
activities of SOD, CAT, PODe0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Qualifier
except that SOD activity in MGW treatment at 75 day was higher than that of INS treatmente0
Comparator
INS treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference showed in the activities of SOD, CAT, POD between MGW and INS treatments except that SOD activity in MGW treatment at 75 day was higher than that of INS treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield and quality of tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MGW raised SOD activity at day 75 above INS.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
MGW treatmente0
Outcome
SOD activitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at 75 daye0
Comparator
INS treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SOD activity in MGW treatment at 75 day was higher than that of INS treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield and quality of tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“A medium culture experiment of tomato using edible fungi culture medium waste as the main component of culture medium was conducted to study the effects of different nutrient solutions, i.e. monosodium glutamate wastewater (MGW), inorganic nutrient solution (INS) and water, on the yield, fruit quality, activities of enzymes which protected against active oxygen and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in leaves on 50 d and 75 d after transplanted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–444 · show in text ↑

monosodium glutamate · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.