Paper · 2004 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

A Preliminary Study of the Role of Cover Crops in Improving Soil Fertility and Yield for Potato Production

S. A. Little; P. J. Hocking; R. S. B. Greene

11
claims
15
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract This study examined the potential of cover crops (fodder rape, oats, and white lupin) to improve phosphorus (P) availability in a high P-fixing Red Ferrosol soil at Robertson, New South Wales. Of particular interest was a fourth cover crop that consisted of white lupin which has P releasing characteristics, grown in combination with fodder rape, which scavenges P with its extensive fine root system. The cover crops were grown for 17 weeks and then mulched at 30 cm above ground to simulate grazing. The cultivar of white lupin used (Kiev Mutant) made poor regrowth after mulching. At 27 weeks after sowing, the cover crops were slashed at soil level and incorporated into the soil. After 7 weeks of decomposition, each cover crop plot was split, and seed potatoes were sown with and without fertilizer. Levels of Olsen-extractable P in the fertilized subplots previously sown to lupin and the lupin/fodder rape combination were significantly higher (16 and 38%, respectively) than in the unfertilized plots at 8 weeks after sowing the potatoes. However, Olsen-extractable P levels in the fertilized oat and fodder rape subplots were similar to those in the unfertilized subplots. Fertilizer increased the yield of potato tubers, but prior cover crop had no effect on tuber yield. The mean apparent recoveries of fertilizer P and N in tubers from the fertilized plants were 4 and 52%, respectively. Although tuber yield did not reflect differences in extractable P among the fertilized subplots, the results suggest that cover crops containing white lupin have the potential to improve P availability to the following potato crop. However, the cultivar of white lupin must be capable of recovering after grazing and match the growth of a companion cover crop. The cover crops containing fodder rape significantly reduced the incidence of Rhizoctonia, presumably due to the biofumigation effect of the rape. The high biomass of the fodder rape and lupin/fodder rape cover crops provided excellent protection for the soil surface against erosion during high intensity rainstorms, as well as providing grazing for stock.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White lupin cultivar Kiev Mutant regrew poorly after mulching.

Taxon
white lupine0
Material
Kiev Mutante0
Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
regrowthe0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar of white lupin used (Kiev Mutant) made poor regrowth after mulching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized plots previously sown to lupin had 16% higher Olsen-extractable P than unfertilized plots.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
fertilized subplots previously sown to lupine0
Outcome
Olsen-extractable Pe0
Direction
highere0
Value
16e0
Qualifier
at 8 weeks after sowing the potatoese0
Comparator
unfertilized plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Levels of Olsen-extractable P in the fertilized subplots previously sown to lupin and the lupin/fodder rape combination were significantly higher (16 and 38%, respectively) than in the unfertilized plots at 8 weeks after sowing the potatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized plots previously sown to lupin/fodder rape had 38% higher Olsen-extractable P than unfertilized plots.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
lupin/fodder rape combinatione0
Outcome
Olsen-extractable Pe0
Direction
highere0
Value
38%e0
Comparator
unfertilized plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Levels of Olsen-extractable P in the fertilized subplots previously sown to lupin and the lupin/fodder rape combination were significantly higher (16 and 38%, respectively) than in the unfertilized plots at 8 weeks after sowing the potatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized oat and fodder rape subplots had Olsen-extractable P similar to unfertilized subplots.

Treatment
fertilized oat and fodder rape subplotse0
Outcome
Olsen-extractable P levelse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
unfertilized subplotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Olsen-extractable P levels in the fertilized oat and fodder rape subplots were similar to those in the unfertilized subplots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer increased potato tuber yield.

Treatment
Fertilizere0
Outcome
yield of potato tuberse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer increased the yield of potato tubers, but prior cover crop had no effect on tuber yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior cover crop had no effect on potato tuber yield.

Treatment
prior cover crope0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer increased the yield of potato tubers, but prior cover crop had no effect on tuber yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent recovery of fertilizer P in potato tubers averaged 4%.

Organ / stage
tuberse0
Outcome
apparent recoveries of fertilizer Pe0
Value
4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean apparent recoveries of fertilizer P and N in tubers from the fertilized plants were 4 and 52%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent recovery of fertilizer N in potato tubers averaged 52%.

Organ / stage
tuberse0
Outcome
apparent recoveries of fertilizer P and Ne0
Value
52%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean apparent recoveries of fertilizer P and N in tubers from the fertilized plants were 4 and 52%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops containing fodder rape significantly reduced Rhizoctonia incidence.

Treatment
cover crops containing fodder rapee0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of Rhizoctoniae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cover crops containing fodder rape significantly reduced the incidence of Rhizoctonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High biomass of fodder rape and lupin/fodder rape protected the soil surface against erosion in intense rainstorms.

Taxon
fodder rapee0
Outcome
protection for the soil surface against erosione0
Qualifier
during high intensity rainstormse0

Verbatim

e0

“The high biomass of the fodder rape and lupin/fodder rape cover crops provided excellent protection for the soil surface against erosion during high intensity rainstorms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–2088 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops containing white lupin may improve phosphorus availability to the following potato crop.

Treatment
cover crops containing white lupine0
Outcome
improve P availability to the following potato crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the results suggest that cover crops containing white lupin have the potential to improve P availability to the following potato crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1642 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

18 papers: 11 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

cover crop · Rhizoctonia · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 97 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.