Paper · 2015 · Planta Daninha

Levels of nutrients and grain yield of maize intercropped with signalgrass (Brachiaria) in different arrangements of plants

M.A.M. FREITAS; D.V. VALADÃO SILVA; M.F. SOUZA; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Competition between maize and signalgrass can economically cripple the intercropping by the reduced yield of maize and dry matter content of the forage. In seeking to define plant arrangements which make this system more efficient, this research was held with the objective of assessing the effects of interference of densities of signalgrass (Urochloa Brizantha) on nutrition and on maize grain yield. Two field experiments were conducted in a randomized block design with four replications. Treatments were arranged similarly in both experiments, in a 2 x 4 factorial design, the first factor being the dose of Nicosulfuron herbicide applied (0 and 8 g ha-1) and the second factor being the forage seeding rates (0, 2, 4 and 6 kg of seeds per hectare). The interference of signalgrass reduced foliar nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus content in maize plants intercropped with the forage. Higher values of grain yield were observed with the reduction of the spacing and the application of the recommended herbicide underdose (8 g ha-1). It was concluded that, regardless of the seeding density of U. Brizantha, reducing the maize seeding inter-rows spacing, combined with the application of an underdose of Nicosulfuron, caused a positive effect by reducing the initial forage growth, resulting in less interference of Urochloa brizantha on nutrient uptake by the maize plants and grain yield of the crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Signalgrass interference reduced foliar nitrogen content in intercropped maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
interference of signalgrasse0
Interactor
signalgrasse0weed
Outcome
foliar nitrogene0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interference of signalgrass reduced foliar nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus content in maize plants intercropped with the forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Signalgrass interference reduced foliar potassium content in intercropped maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
interference of signalgrasse0
Interactor
signalgrasse0weed
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interference of signalgrass reduced foliar nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus content in maize plants intercropped with the forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Signalgrass interference reduced foliar phosphorus content in intercropped maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
interference of signalgrasse0
Interactor
signalgrasse0weed
Outcome
phosphorus contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interference of signalgrass reduced foliar nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus content in maize plants intercropped with the forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced spacing increased maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
reduction of the spacinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of grain yield were observed with the reduction of the spacing and the application of the recommended herbicide underdose (8 g ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying the recommended herbicide underdose increased maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
recommended herbicide underdose (8 g ha-1)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of grain yield were observed with the reduction of the spacing and the application of the recommended herbicide underdose (8 g ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced maize row spacing with Nicosulfuron underdose reduced initial forage growth regardless of signalgrass seeding density.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
reducing the maize seeding inter-rows spacing, combined with the application of an underdose of Nicosulfurone0
Interactor
U. Brizanthae0weed
Outcome
initial forage growthe0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“regardless of the seeding density of U. Brizantha, reducing the maize seeding inter-rows spacing, combined with the application of an underdose of Nicosulfuron, caused a positive effect by reducing the initial forage growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced row spacing with Nicosulfuron underdose lessened signalgrass interference with maize nutrient uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Nicosulfurone1
Interactor
Urochloa brizanthaUrochloa brizanthae0weed
Outcome
nutrient uptake by the maize plantse0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Urochloa brizantha
Urochloa brizantha · Interactorhttp://www.hear.org/starr/imageusepolicy.htm This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in less interference of Urochloa brizantha on nutrient uptake by the maize plants and grain yield of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“regardless of the seeding density of U. Brizantha, reducing the maize seeding inter-rows spacing, combined with the application of an underdose of Nicosulfuron, caused a positive effect by reducing the initial forage growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1285 · show in text ↑

nicosulfuron · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 14 positive, 17 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

density · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

197 papers: 119 positive, 78 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

193 papers more in this group

See all 197 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.