Paper · 1998 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Yield and partitioning in crops of contrasting cultivars of winter wheat in response to CO2 and temperature in field studies using temperature gradient tunnels

G. R. BATTS; R. H. ELLIS; J. I. L. MORISON; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
71
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Diverse cultivars of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were grown in the field in 1993/94 and 1994/95 at Reading UK in temperature gradient tunnels at normal atmospheric ( c . 370) or elevated CO 2 concentration ( c . 700 μmol CO 2 mol −1 air). In 1993/94, grain yield of cv. Avalon was insensitive to mean temperature (between 8·8 and 10·9°C), while elevated CO 2 increased yield by 1·3 t ha −1 (12·6%). In all other cultivars, warming reduced grain yield and CO 2 increased grain yield. In 1993/94, in cvs Galahad and Mercia the effects of CO 2 and temperature on yield were additive. However, for cv. Hereward in both years and for cv. Soissons in 1994/95, there were negative interactions between the effects of CO 2 and temperature on yield: the maximum benefit of doubling CO 2 to grain yield, 4·5 and 2·7 t ha −1 (65 and 29%) respectively, occurred at cooler temperatures; there was no benefit from doubling CO 2 (i.e. 0%) once the temperature had increased above the seasonal mean by 2·2–2·6°C in cv. Hereward and by 1·3°C in cv. Soissons. The beneficial effect of doubling CO 2 on grain yield in cvs Galahad, Hereward, Mercia and Soissons was negated by an increase in mean seasonal temperature of only 0·7–2·0°C. Warming decreased root dry mass at anthesis in 1994/95 while it increased at elevated CO 2 (49 and 186%, coolest and warmest regime, respectively). Carbon partitioned to roots declined progressively with warming, while at elevated CO 2 there was an average of 56% increase in allocation to roots. The relative impacts of both CO 2 and temperature were greater on root dry mass than on either grain yield or total above-ground biomass, while the effects on grain and biomass yield varied considerably between cultivars, suggesting that the impact of rising CO 2 and temperature are likely to be dependent on cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Avalon grain yield was insensitive to mean temperature from 8·8 to 10·9°C.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
cv. Avalone0
Treatment
mean temperaturee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
insensitivee0
Qualifier
between 8·8 and 10·9°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of cv. Avalon was insensitive to mean temperature (between 8·8 and 10·9°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased Avalon grain yield by 1·3 t ha −1.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1·3 t ha −1e0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated CO 2 increased yield by 1·3 t ha −1 (12·6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming reduced grain yield in the other cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
warminge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
all other cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all other cultivars, warming reduced grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased grain yield in the other cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
CO 2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 increased grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–490 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 and temperature effects on Galahad and Mercia yield were additive.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
cvs Galahad and Merciae0
Outcome
effects of CO 2 and temperature on yield were additivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cvs Galahad and Mercia the effects of CO 2 and temperature on yield were additive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hereward and Soissons showed negative CO2 by temperature interactions for yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
cv. Herewarde0
Outcome
negative interactions between the effects of CO 2 and temperature on yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for cv. Hereward in both years and for cv. Soissons in 1994/95, there were negative interactions between the effects of CO 2 and temperature on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum CO2 benefit to Hereward grain yield was 4·5 t ha −1 at cooler temperatures.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
doubling CO 2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4·5e0
Qualifier
cooler temperaturese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum benefit of doubling CO 2 to grain yield, 4·5 and 2·7 t ha −1 (65 and 29%) respectively, occurred at cooler temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum CO2 benefit to Soissons grain yield was 2·7 t ha −1 at cooler temperatures.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
doubling CO 2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2·7 t ha −1e0
Qualifier
cooler temperaturese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum benefit of doubling CO 2 to grain yield, 4·5 and 2·7 t ha −1 (65 and 29%) respectively, occurred at cooler temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubling CO2 brought no yield benefit for Hereward above a 2·2–2·6°C temperature increase.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
cv. Herewarde0
Treatment
doubling CO 2e0
Outcome
benefite0
Direction
no benefite0
Value
0%e0
Qualifier
2·2–2·6°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no benefit from doubling CO 2 (i.e. 0%) once the temperature had increased above the seasonal mean by 2·2–2·6°C in cv. Hereward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubling CO2 brought no yield benefit for Soissons above a 1·3°C increase.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
cv. Soissonse0
Treatment
doubling CO 2e0
Outcome
benefite0
Direction
no benefite0
Value
0%e0
Qualifier
1·3°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no benefit from doubling CO 2 (i.e. 0%) once the temperature had increased above the seasonal mean by 2·2–2·6°C in cv. Hereward and by 1·3°C in cv. Soissons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 0·7–2·0°C warming negated the CO2 yield benefit in four cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in mean seasonal temperaturee0
Outcome
beneficial effect of doubling CO 2 on grain yielde0
Direction
negatede0
Value
0·7–2·0°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“beneficial effect of doubling CO 2 on grain yield in cvs Galahad, Hereward, Mercia and Soissons was negated by an increase in mean seasonal temperature of only 0·7–2·0°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming decreased root dry mass at anthesis.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
anthesise0
Treatment
Warminge0
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Warming decreased root dry mass at anthesis in 1994/95”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased root dry mass.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
49 and 186%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Warming decreased root dry mass at anthesis in 1994/95 while it increased at elevated CO 2 (49 and 186%, coolest and warmest regime, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming progressively reduced carbon allocation to roots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
warminge0
Outcome
Carbon partitioned to rootse0
Direction
declined progressivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbon partitioned to roots declined progressively with warming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased root carbon allocation by 56% on average.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
allocation to rootse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at elevated CO 2 there was an average of 56% increase in allocation to roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry mass responded more strongly than grain yield or above-ground biomass to CO2 and temperature.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
grain yield or total above-ground biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative impacts of both CO 2 and temperature were greater on root dry mass than on either grain yield or total above-ground biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1659 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effects on grain and biomass yield varied considerably among cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
grain and biomass yielde0
Direction
varied considerablye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects on grain and biomass yield varied considerably between cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1743 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑

heat · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

62 papers: 26 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

heat · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 42 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

254 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.