Paper · 2005 · Tree Physiology

Physiological and biochemical leaf and tree responses to crop load in apple

J. N. Wunsche; D. H. Greer; W. A. Laing; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
112
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Seven-year-old apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) trees cv. 'Braeburn' on rootstock M.26 were flower-thinned to establish four crop loads, resulting in final mean fruit numbers per tree of 0, 100, 225 and 400. Mean fruit mass decreased by about 35% with each decrease in cropping density. Fruit from light-cropping trees had significantly advanced maturity as indicated by the harvest management criteria of background color and starch/iodine score, and other fruit quality characteristics such as soluble solids. Flesh firmness and dry matter also increased with decreasing crop load. Compared with fruiting trees, mean leaf photosynthetic rates of non-cropping trees were significantly lower (40%) between 75 days after full bloom (dafb) and fruit harvest, with a maximum reduction of almost 60% at 118 dafb. Photosynthetic activity decreased linearly with increasing concentration of leaf starch, but was positively and significantly related to stomatal conductance. Consequently, the accumulation of nonstructural carbohydrates in leaves of light-cropping or non-cropping trees may have led to end-product inhibition of photosynthesis. Increases in xanthophyll cycle carotenoids mediated non-radiative thermal energy dissipation in non-cropping trees, providing increased capacity for photoprotection but reducing photochemical efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean fruit mass decreased by about 35% with each decrease in cropping density.

Treatment
cropping densitye1
Outcome
Mean fruit masse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
about 35%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean fruit mass decreased by about 35% with each decrease in cropping density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from light-cropping trees had significantly advanced maturity by background color and starch/iodine score.

Treatment
light-cropping treese1
Outcome
maturitye1
Direction
advancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit from light-cropping trees had significantly advanced maturity as indicated by the harvest management criteria of background color and starch/iodine score”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flesh firmness and dry matter increased with decreasing crop load.

Treatment
decreasing crop loade1
Outcome
Flesh firmness and dry mattere1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Flesh firmness and dry matter also increased with decreasing crop load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean leaf photosynthetic rates of non-cropping trees were significantly lower (40%) than fruiting trees between 75 days after full bloom and harvest.

Treatment
non-cropping treese1
Outcome
mean leaf photosynthetic ratese1
Direction
lowere1
Value
40%e1
Qualifier
between 75 days after full bloom (dafb) and fruit harveste1
Comparator
fruiting treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with fruiting trees, mean leaf photosynthetic rates of non-cropping trees were significantly lower (40%) between 75 days after full bloom (dafb) and fruit harvest, with a maximum reduction of almost 60% at 118 dafb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum reduction in photosynthetic rate of non-cropping trees was almost 60% at 118 days after full bloom.

Treatment
non-cropping treese1
Outcome
mean leaf photosynthetic ratese1
Direction
reductione1
Value
almost 60%e1
Qualifier
118 dafbe1
Comparator
fruiting treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with fruiting trees, mean leaf photosynthetic rates of non-cropping trees were significantly lower (40%) between 75 days after full bloom (dafb) and fruit harvest, with a maximum reduction of almost 60% at 118 dafb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–807 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic activity decreased linearly with increasing leaf starch concentration.

Organ / stage
leafe1
Compound
leaf starche1
Outcome
Photosynthetic activitye1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Photosynthetic activity decreased linearly with increasing concentration of leaf starch, but was positively and significantly related to stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–966 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic activity was positively and significantly related to stomatal conductance.

Organ / stage
leafe1
Outcome
Photosynthetic activitye1
Direction
positivelye1
Qualifier
stomatal conductancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Photosynthetic activity decreased linearly with increasing concentration of leaf starch, but was positively and significantly related to stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–966 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulation of nonstructural carbohydrates in leaves of light-cropping or non-cropping trees may have led to end-product inhibition of photosynthesis.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Compound
nonstructural carbohydratese1
Outcome
end-product inhibition of photosynthesise1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“the accumulation of nonstructural carbohydrates in leaves of light-cropping or non-cropping trees may have led to end-product inhibition of photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1136 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increases in xanthophyll cycle carotenoids mediated non-radiative thermal energy dissipation in non-cropping trees, increasing capacity for photoprotection.

Treatment
non-cropping treese1
Compound
xanthophyll cycle carotenoidse1
Outcome
non-radiative thermal energy dissipatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increases in xanthophyll cycle carotenoids mediated non-radiative thermal energy dissipation in non-cropping trees, providing increased capacity for photoprotection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-cropping trees had reduced photochemical efficiency.

Treatment
non-cropping treese1
Outcome
photochemical efficiencye1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increases in xanthophyll cycle carotenoids mediated non-radiative thermal energy dissipation in non-cropping trees, providing increased capacity for photoprotection but reducing photochemical efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1340 · show in text ↑