Paper · 1960 · Botanical Gazette

Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil

S. Nakayama; H. A. Borthwick; S. B. Hendricks

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
57
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1. Flowering of seedlings of Japanese morning-glory, Pharbitis nil Chois., grown in nutrient solution or in soil is inhibited by far-red and repromoted by red irradiations at the beginning of 16-hour dark periods and inhibited by both red and far-red irradiations at the middle of such dark periods. Older plants are not responsive to red or far-red irradiations at the beginning of the dark period, but, at the middle, red inhibits flowering and far red repromotes it. 2. Seedlings irradiated at the beginning of the dark period flower if at least one cotyledon is either not irradiated with far red or is irradiated with red after far red. Flowering of seedlings following irradiation at the middle of the dark period occurs only if one cotyledon is not irradiated. 3. Action spectra for control of flowering by irradiation of cotyledons were measured at the start and near the middle of inductive dark periods adequate to promote flowering. The energies required at the beginning of the dark period for half-saturation of the far-red and red responses are similar in value to those required for reversible control of flowering of other photoperiodic plants near the middle of inductive dark periods. 4. Approximately the same energies are required for control of flowering by red radiation at the beginning and near the middle of the inductive dark periods. The flowering response potentiated by red radiation, however, is not reversible by far-red radiation near the middle of the dark period and is opposite to the response upon the onset of darkness. About 4 hours in darkness are required for the plant to change from the one to the other type of response.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red irradiation at the start of darkness inhibited seedling flowering.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nile0
Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
far-rede0
Outcome
Floweringe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering of seedlings of Japanese morning-glory, Pharbitis nil Chois., grown in nutrient solution or in soil is inhibited by far-red and repromoted by red irradiations at the beginning of 16-hour dark periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red irradiation repromoted seedling flowering at the start of darkness.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nile0
Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
red irradiationse0
Outcome
Floweringe0
Direction
repromotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering of seedlings of Japanese morning-glory, Pharbitis nil Chois., grown in nutrient solution or in soil is inhibited by far-red and repromoted by red irradiations at the beginning of 16-hour dark periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both red and far-red irradiation in mid-darkness inhibited seedling flowering.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Treatment
both red and far-red irradiationse0
Outcome
inhibitede0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibited by both red and far-red irradiations at the middle of such dark periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Older plants did not respond to red or far-red at the start of darkness.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Organ / stage
Older plantse0
Treatment
red or far-red irradiationse0
Outcome
not responsivee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Older plants are not responsive to red or far-red irradiations at the beginning of the dark period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-darkness red irradiation inhibited flowering in older plants.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Treatment
rede0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
inhibitse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the middle, red inhibits flowering and far red repromotes it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-darkness far-red irradiation repromoted flowering in older plants.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Treatment
far rede0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
repromotese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the middle, red inhibits flowering and far red repromotes it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At dark-period onset, seedlings flowered when at least one cotyledon avoided far-red.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Organ / stage
cotyledone0
Outcome
flowere0
Qualifier
not irradiated with far rede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings irradiated at the beginning of the dark period flower if at least one cotyledon is either not irradiated with far red or is irradiated with red after far red.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At dark-period onset, seedlings flowered when a cotyledon received red after far-red.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Organ / stage
cotyledone0
Outcome
flowere0
Qualifier
irradiated with red after far rede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings irradiated at the beginning of the dark period flower if at least one cotyledon is either not irradiated with far red or is irradiated with red after far red.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After mid-darkness irradiation, seedlings flowered only if a cotyledon was unirradiated.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Organ / stage
cotyledone0
Outcome
Floweringe0
Qualifier
not irradiatede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering of seedlings following irradiation at the middle of the dark period occurs only if one cotyledon is not irradiated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red half-saturation energy at dark onset was similar to energy for reversible flowering control in other plants.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Outcome
energies requirede0
Direction
similar in valuee0
Comparator
other photoperiodic plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The energies required at the beginning of the dark period for half-saturation of the far-red and red responses are similar in value to those required for reversible control of flowering of other photoperiodic plants near the middle of inductive dark periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red half-saturation energy at dark onset was similar to energy for reversible flowering control in other plants.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Outcome
energies requirede0
Direction
similar in valuee0
Comparator
other photoperiodic plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The energies required at the beginning of the dark period for half-saturation of the far-red and red responses are similar in value to those required for reversible control of flowering of other photoperiodic plants near the middle of inductive dark periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red irradiation required approximately the same energy at the start and middle of inductive darkness.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Outcome
energiese0
Direction
samee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Approximately the same energies are required for control of flowering by red radiation at the beginning and near the middle of the inductive dark periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red at mid-darkness did not reverse the flowering response potentiated by red.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Treatment
far-red radiatione0
Outcome
flowering responsee0
Direction
not reversiblee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flowering response potentiated by red radiation, however, is not reversible by far-red radiation near the middle of the dark period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The flowering response to red at mid-darkness opposed its response at dark onset.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
oppositee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“is opposite to the response upon the onset of darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transition between the two response types required about four hours of darkness.

Taxon
Pharbitis nilIpomoea nilt0
Outcome
change from the one to the other type of responsee0
Value
4 hourse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea nil
Ipomoea nil · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 4 hours in darkness are required for the plant to change from the one to the other type of response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑

light · phenology · Ipomoea nil (Japanese morning glory)Results differ

29 papers: 16 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

radiation · phenology · Ipomoea nil (Japanese morning glory)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.