Paper · 1985 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Shoot Turgor Does Not Limit Shoot Growth of NaCl-Affected Wheat and Barley

Annie Termaat; John B. Passioura; Rana Munns

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
188
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The aim of this work was to test the hypothesis that the reduced growth rate of wheat and barley that results when the roots are exposed to NaCl is due to inadequate turgor in the expanding cells of the leaves. The hypothesis was tested by exposing plants to 100 millimolar NaCl (which reduced their growth rates by about 20%), growing them for 7 to 10 days with their roots in pressure chambers, and applying sufficient pneumatic pressure in the chambers to offset the osmotic pressure of the NaCl, namely, 0.48 megapascals. The results showed that applying the pressure had no sustained effect (relative to unpressurized controls) on growth rates, transpiration rates, or osmotic pressures of the cell sap, in either the fully expanded or currently expanding leaf tissue, of both wheat and barley. The results indicate that the applied pressure correspondingly increased turgor in the shoot although this was not directly measured. We conclude that shoot turgor alone was not regulating the growth of these NaCl-affected plants, and, after discussing other possible influences, argue that a message arising in the roots may be regulating the growth of the shoot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl exposure reduced wheat and barley growth rates by about 20%.

Treatment
100 millimolar NaCle0
Outcome
growth ratese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exposing plants to 100 millimolar NaCl (which reduced their growth rates by about 20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressure offsetting NaCl osmotic pressure had no sustained effect on wheat and barley growth rates.

Treatment
applying the pressuree0
Outcome
growth ratese0
Direction
no sustained effecte0
Comparator
unpressurized controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying the pressure had no sustained effect (relative to unpressurized controls) on growth rates, transpiration rates, or osmotic pressures of the cell sap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressure offsetting NaCl osmotic pressure had no sustained effect on wheat and barley transpiration rates or cell sap osmotic pressure.

Treatment
applying the pressuree0
Outcome
transpiration rates, or osmotic pressures of the cell sape0
Direction
no sustained effecte0
Comparator
unpressurized controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying the pressure had no sustained effect (relative to unpressurized controls) on growth rates, transpiration rates, or osmotic pressures of the cell sap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–74 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred that applied pressure increased shoot turgor, although they did not measure it directly.

Taxon
shoote0
Treatment
applied pressuree0
Outcome
turgor in the shoote0

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicate that the applied pressure correspondingly increased turgor in the shoot although this was not directly measured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–933 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded shoot turgor alone did not regulate growth of NaCl-affected wheat and barley.

Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
shoot turgor alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We conclude that shoot turgor alone was not regulating the growth of these NaCl-affected plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–74 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed a root-derived message may regulate shoot growth under NaCl.

Outcome
growth of the shoote0
Qualifier
a message arising in the rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“argue that a message arising in the roots may be regulating the growth of the shoot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–74 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

47 papers: 6 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

sodium chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

137 papers: 24 positive, 113 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.