Paper · 1967 · Agronomy Journal

Winter Cover Crops for Sod‐Planted Corn: Their Selection and Management1

W. W. Moschler; G. M. Shear; D. L. Hallock; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
64
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period. Conventionally tilled corn with cover crop turnplowed and sod‐planted corn were also compared. Rye ( Secale cereale L.) was the most satisfactory because of superior winter hardiness, susceptibility to herbicidal killing, and the production of relatively large amounts of persistent mulch. Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and oats ( Avena sativa L.) were comparable as mulches except at higher elevations where oats winterkilled. Barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) was the least satisfactory winter grain tested because of resistance to herbicides. Inclusion of crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.) or hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth.) in winter grain seedings slightly increased mulch forage but not corn yields. In general, highest corn yields occurred where largest amounts of cover crop mulch occurred, except for Italian ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum Lam.). The additional mulch produced by late versus early killing of particular cover crops tended to increase corn yields, though not always significantly. Planting corn in rye stubble after removal of forage for hay or silage reduced corn yields an average of 47% in three of seven comparisons with rye left as mulch, while yields in the remaining four were comparable. Yields of sod‐planted corn in rye sod averaged 44% higher than conventionally tilled corn in 4 of 13 comparisons and were comparable in the remaining nine. More soil moisture was found under sod‐planted corn than under conventionally tilled corn, especially during the first half of the growing season. Corn yields were increased or at least maintained, in comparison to conventional tillage, by sod‐planting in rye over a wide range of soil and moisture conditions, with the added advantages of improved soil and water conservation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye was the most satisfactory winter cover crop for sod-planted corn.

Material
Rye ( Secale cereale L.)e1
Outcome
most satisfactorye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rye ( Secale cereale L.) was the most satisfactory because of superior winter hardiness, susceptibility to herbicidal killing, and the production of relatively large amounts of persistent mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–444 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat and oats were comparable as mulches.

Material
Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)e2
Outcome
comparable as mulchese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e2

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and oats ( Avena sativa L.) were comparable as mulches except at higher elevations where oats winterkilled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–582 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oats winterkilled at higher elevations.

Material
oats ( Avena sativa L.)e2
Outcome
winterkillede2
Setting
higher elevationse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e2

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and oats ( Avena sativa L.) were comparable as mulches except at higher elevations where oats winterkilled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–582 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley was the least satisfactory winter grain tested, because of resistance to herbicides.

Material
Barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)e3
Outcome
least satisfactorye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e3

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) was the least satisfactory winter grain tested because of resistance to herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inclusion of crimson clover or hairy vetch in winter grain seedings slightly increased mulch forage.

Treatment
Inclusion of crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.) or hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth.)e4
Outcome
mulch foragee4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
slightlye4
Comparator
winter grain seedingse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e4

“Inclusion of crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.) or hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth.) in winter grain seedings slightly increased mulch forage but not corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inclusion of crimson clover or hairy vetch in winter grain seedings did not change corn yields.

Treatment
Inclusion of crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.) or hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth.)e4
Outcome
corn yieldse4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
winter grain seedingse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e4

“Inclusion of crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.) or hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth.) in winter grain seedings slightly increased mulch forage but not corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting corn in rye stubble after forage removal reduced corn yields by an average of 47% in three of seven comparisons.

Treatment
Planting corn in rye stubble after removal of forage for hay or silagee5
Outcome
corn yieldse5
Direction
reducede5
Value
47%e5
Qualifier
in three of seven comparisonse5
Comparator
rye left as mulche5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e5

“Planting corn in rye stubble after removal of forage for hay or silage reduced corn yields an average of 47% in three of seven comparisons with rye left as mulch, while yields in the remaining four were comparable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yields after planting in rye stubble after forage removal were comparable to rye left as mulch in the remaining four comparisons.

Treatment
Planting corn in rye stubble after removal of forage for hay or silagee5
Outcome
yieldse5
Direction
comparablee5
Qualifier
in the remaining foure5
Comparator
rye left as mulche5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e5

“Planting corn in rye stubble after removal of forage for hay or silage reduced corn yields an average of 47% in three of seven comparisons with rye left as mulch, while yields in the remaining four were comparable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields of sod-planted corn in rye sod averaged 44% higher than conventionally tilled corn in 4 of 13 comparisons.

Treatment
sod‐planted corn in rye sode6
Outcome
Yieldse6
Direction
highere6
Value
44%e6
Qualifier
in 4 of 13 comparisonse6
Comparator
conventionally tilled corne6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e6

“Yields of sod‐planted corn in rye sod averaged 44% higher than conventionally tilled corn in 4 of 13 comparisons and were comparable in the remaining nine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields of sod-planted corn in rye sod were comparable to conventionally tilled corn in the remaining nine comparisons.

Treatment
sod‐planted corn in rye sode6
Outcome
Yieldse6
Direction
comparablee6
Qualifier
in the remaining ninee6
Comparator
conventionally tilled corne6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e6

“Yields of sod‐planted corn in rye sod averaged 44% higher than conventionally tilled corn in 4 of 13 comparisons and were comparable in the remaining nine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More soil moisture was found under sod-planted corn than under conventionally tilled corn, especially in the first half of the growing season.

Treatment
sod‐planted corne7
Outcome
soil moisturee7
Direction
Moree7
Qualifier
especially during the first half of the growing seasone7
Comparator
conventionally tilled corne7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e7

“More soil moisture was found under sod‐planted corn than under conventionally tilled corn, especially during the first half of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sod-planting in rye increased or at least maintained corn yields compared with conventional tillage over a wide range of soil and moisture conditions.

Treatment
sod‐planting in ryee6
Outcome
Corn yieldse6
Direction
increased or at least maintainede6
Qualifier
over a wide range of soil and moisture conditionse6
Comparator
conventional tillagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e6

“Corn yields were increased or at least maintained, in comparison to conventional tillage, by sod‐planting in rye over a wide range of soil and moisture conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1847 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sod-planting in rye is advantageous for soil and water conservation in corn.

Outcome
improved soil and water conservatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter cover crops for sod‐planted corn ( Zea mays L.) were studied in 11 location‐year field experiments in Virginia during the 1962–1966 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154 · show in text ↑
e7

“with the added advantages of improved soil and water conservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1849–1914 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Vicia villosa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

processing · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 39 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.