Paper · 2010 · American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences

The Efficiency of Trichoderma harzianum and Aneurinobacillus migulanus in the Control of Gladiolus Corm Rot in Soil-Less Culture System

Walid

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Problem statement: Gladiolus is cultivated commonly for cut flower production, frequently as a protected crop. The glasshouse or polytunnel environment, providing excellent conditions for flower production, also make conditions more favorable for disease to develop. Approach: The pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli causes wilt diseases in a wide range of economically important plants and can have devastating effects on crop production. Trichoderma harzianum and Aneurinobacillus migulanus were tested separately and in combination for controlling F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioli activity in soilless culture using Perlite as the substrate. Results: The efficiency of both of antagonists against corm rot was evaluated based on vegetative and root growth parameters and on flowering parameters. T. harzianum was more effective than A. migulanus in disease suppression and also enhanced plant growth, increased flower production and quality. A. migulanus enhanced plant growth when tested alone. The mixture of antagonists reduced the efficiency of T. harzianum. Numbers of T. harzianum CFU in the substrate and on corms increased following application compared with treating with both antagonists. No T. harzianum was detected in the substrate by 120 day after planting, however, A. migulanus CFU significantly decreased on corms when inoculated in combination with T. harzianum and F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioli. However, A. migulanus CFU was not detected in the substrate of the same combination. SEM and Glasshouse results suggested that suppressive mechanisms of T. harzianum and A. migulanus differed. T. harzianum appeared to operate through a combination of antibiosis and substrate competition, whereas A. migulanus produced an electron-dense substance which may have inhibited the penetration of host tissues by F. oxysporum f. sp. gladiolus. Greater growth of T. harzianum was observed when inoculated alone or with F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioli hyphae. Conclusion: It was concluded that T. harzianum provided a more efficient and effective control of F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioli corm rot of Gladiolus when inoculated without A. migulanus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum suppressed Gladiolus corm rot more effectively than Aneurinobacillus migulanus.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
T. harzianume0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioliFusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladiolie1pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
A. migulanuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. harzianum was more effective than A. migulanus in disease suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli causes wilt diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trichoderma harzianum and Aneurinobacillus migulanus in the Control of Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum enhanced Gladiolus growth, flower production and quality.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growth, increased flower production and qualitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. harzianum was more effective than A. migulanus in disease suppression and also enhanced plant growth, increased flower production and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aneurinobacillus migulanus alone enhanced Gladiolus growth.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
A. migulanuse0
Interactor
A. migulanuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. migulanus enhanced plant growth when tested alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining the antagonists reduced Trichoderma harzianum efficacy in Gladiolus.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
mixture of antagonistse0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Aneurinobacillus migulanust0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
efficiency of T. harzianume0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
T. harzianume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture of antagonists reduced the efficiency of T. harzianum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trichoderma harzianum and Aneurinobacillus migulanus in the Control of Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum CFU on Gladiolus corms and substrate increased after solo application compared with joint application.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
following applicatione0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
T. harzianum CFU in the substrate and on cormse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
treating with both antagonistse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Numbers of T. harzianum CFU in the substrate and on corms increased following application compared with treating with both antagonists.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum was undetectable in Gladiolus substrate by 120 days after planting.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
No T. harzianum was detected in the substratee0
Qualifier
by 120 day after plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No T. harzianum was detected in the substrate by 120 day after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aneurinobacillus migulanus CFU on Gladiolus corms decreased with joint inoculation with Trichoderma and Fusarium.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Organ / stage
cormse0
Treatment
inoculated in combination with T. harzianum and F. oxysporum f. sp. gladiolie0
Interactor
A. migulanuse0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioliFusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladiolie0pathogen
Outcome
A. migulanus CFUe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. migulanus CFU significantly decreased on corms when inoculated in combination with T. harzianum and F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioli.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aneurinobacillus migulanus CFU was undetectable in substrate under the same joint inoculation.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Interactor
A. migulanuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
A. migulanus CFU was not detected in the substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. migulanus CFU was not detected in the substrate of the same combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–107 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two antagonists appeared to suppress Gladiolus disease through different mechanisms.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Outcome
suppressive mechanisms of T. harzianum and A. migulanus differede0
Qualifier
SEM and Glasshouse results suggestede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SEM and Glasshouse results suggested that suppressive mechanisms of T. harzianum and A. migulanus differed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–107 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum appeared to act through antibiosis and substrate competition in Gladiolus culture.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antibiosis and substrate competitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. harzianum appeared to operate through a combination of antibiosis and substrate competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–107 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aneurinobacillus migulanus produced a substance that may inhibit Fusarium penetration of Gladiolus tissue.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Interactor
F. oxysporum f. sp. gladiolusFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Second interactor
A. migulanuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
penetration of host tissues by F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioluse0
Qualifier
electron-dense substancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. migulanus produced an electron-dense substance which may have inhibited the penetration of host tissues by F. oxysporum f. sp. gladiolus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum growth was greater when alone or with Fusarium hyphae in Gladiolus culture.

Taxon
GladiolusGladiolust0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of T. harzianume0
Direction
Greatere0
Qualifier
when inoculated alone or with F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioli hyphaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater growth of T. harzianum was observed when inoculated alone or with F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioli hyphae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–1969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus Corm Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–107 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma harzianum · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli · GladiolusResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.