Abstract
Abstract Influence of genetic variability on Zn response in wheat ( Triticum sp.) was evaluated in the greenhouse. There was considerable difference among 21 varieties in the time of appearance and intensity of deficiency symptoms, yield depression, and Zn concentration under Zn stress conditions. Without supplemental Zn, dry matter yields of shoot and roots were 8.6 to 33.5% and 9.4 to 36.8% lower, respectively, than at 5 ppm Zn level. Zinc concentration of varieties ranged from 4.2 to 28.3 ppm under zinc deficiency conditions. The differential response among the varieties was found closely linked to their efficiency in Zn utilization from the soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat varieties differed in onset and intensity of zinc deficiency symptoms, yield depression, and zinc concentration under zinc stress.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- 21 varietiese0
- Outcome
- time of appearance and intensity of deficiency symptoms, yield depression, and Zn concentratione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was considerable difference among 21 varieties in the time of appearance and intensity of deficiency symptoms, yield depression, and Zn concentration under Zn stress conditions.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Without supplemental zinc, shoot dry matter yields were 8.6 to 33.5% lower than at 5 ppm zinc.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- shoote0
- Treatment
- Without supplemental Zne0
- Outcome
- dry matter yields of shoote0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 8.6 to 33.5%e0
- Comparator
- 5 ppm Zn levele0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Without supplemental Zn, dry matter yields of shoot and roots were 8.6 to 33.5% and 9.4 to 36.8% lower, respectively, than at 5 ppm Zn level.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Without supplemental zinc, root dry matter yields were 9.4 to 36.8% lower than at 5 ppm zinc.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- Without supplemental Zne0
- Outcome
- dry matter yields of shoot and rootse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 9.4 to 36.8%e0
- Comparator
- 5 ppm Zn levele0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Without supplemental Zn, dry matter yields of shoot and roots were 8.6 to 33.5% and 9.4 to 36.8% lower, respectively, than at 5 ppm Zn level.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Varietal zinc concentrations ranged from 4.2 to 28.3 ppm under zinc deficiency.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- Zinc concentratione0
- Value
- 4.2 to 28.3 ppme0
- Qualifier
- under zinc deficiency conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Zinc concentration of varieties ranged from 4.2 to 28.3 ppm under zinc deficiency conditions.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Varietal differences in zinc response were closely linked to soil zinc utilization efficiency.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- varietiese0
- Outcome
- differential responsee0
- Qualifier
- efficiency in Zn utilization from the soile0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The differential response among the varieties was found closely linked to their efficiency in Zn utilization from the soil.”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.
- positive
- no effect
- negative
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.