Paper · 2004 · Crop Science

Physiological Recovery of Kentucky Bluegrass from Simultaneous Drought and Heat Stress

Zhaolong Wang; Bingru Huang

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
225
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Drought and heat are two major factors limiting growth of cool season grasses. Rapid recovery from the combination of those stresses is important for the persistence of perennial turfgrasses. The study was designed to examine physiological factors associated with the persistence and recovery of Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.) exposed to combined drought and heat stress following rewatering and/or temperature drop. Two cultivars differing in drought and heat tolerance, ‘Midnight’ (tolerant) and ‘Brilliant’ (sensitive), were exposed to drought and heat stress (35°C) simultaneously in a growth chamber until most plants became brown and completely desiccated (14 d). Plants were then subjected to three recovery treatments: (i) rewatered but exposed to heat stress (rewatering); (ii) returned to optimum temperature (20°C) but unwatered (cooling), and (iii) rewatering and cooling. Leaf photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), chlorophyll content, and activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) declined, while electrolyte leakage (EL) and lipid peroxidation increased rapidly during the combined stress. The adverse impact of the combined stress was more severe for Brilliant than for Midnight. Following rewatering or in combination with cooling, all parameters except chlorophyll content fully recovered for Midnight. However, for Brilliant, most of the parameters did not recover completely; Fv/Fm recovered partially. There was no recovery for any parameters of either cultivar when plants were returned to the optimum temperature but still unwatered. The results suggested that simultaneous drought and heat stress could cause permanent physiological damage for Kentucky bluegrass, particularly for the stress‐sensitive cultivar. Rewatering was essential for physiological recovery from the combined stress, regardless of temperature conditions. Rapid resumption of Fv/Fm, cell membrane stability, and antioxidant activities were important factors contributing to the recovery of Kentucky bluegrass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined drought and heat stress reduced leaf Fv/Fm and chlorophyll content in Kentucky bluegrass.

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise1
Treatment
combined drought and heat stresse2
Outcome
Leaf photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), chlorophyll contente3
Direction
declinede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–334 · show in text ↑
e2

“exposed to combined drought and heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–378 · show in text ↑
e3

“Leaf photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), chlorophyll content, and activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined drought and heat stress reduced superoxide dismutase and catalase activities in Kentucky bluegrass.

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise1
Treatment
combined drought and heat stresse2
Outcome
activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT)e3
Direction
declinede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–334 · show in text ↑
e2

“exposed to combined drought and heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–378 · show in text ↑
e3

“Leaf photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), chlorophyll content, and activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined stress increased electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation in Kentucky bluegrass.

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise1
Treatment
combined stresse2
Outcome
electrolyte leakage (EL) and lipid peroxidatione2
Direction
increased rapidlye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–334 · show in text ↑
e2

“electrolyte leakage (EL) and lipid peroxidation increased rapidly during the combined stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined stress had a more severe adverse impact on Brilliant than on Midnight.

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise1
Material
Brilliante2
Treatment
combined stresse2
Outcome
adverse impacte2
Direction
more severee2
Comparator
Midnighte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–334 · show in text ↑
e2

“The adverse impact of the combined stress was more severe for Brilliant than for Midnight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After rewatering or rewatering with cooling, all parameters except chlorophyll content fully recovered in Midnight.

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise1
Material
Midnighte2
Treatment
rewatering or in combination with coolinge2
Outcome
all parameters except chlorophyll contente2
Direction
fully recoverede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–334 · show in text ↑
e2

“Following rewatering or in combination with cooling, all parameters except chlorophyll content fully recovered for Midnight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most parameters of Brilliant did not recover completely after the recovery treatments.

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise1
Material
Brilliante2
Treatment
three recovery treatmentse3
Outcome
most of the parameterse2
Direction
did not recover completelye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–334 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, for Brilliant, most of the parameters did not recover completely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1416 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plants were then subjected to three recovery treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm of Brilliant recovered only partially after the recovery treatments.

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise1
Material
Brilliante3
Treatment
three recovery treatmentse4
Outcome
Fv/Fme2
Direction
recovered partiallye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–334 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fv/Fm recovered partially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1443 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, for Brilliant, most of the parameters did not recover completely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1416 · show in text ↑
e4

“Plants were then subjected to three recovery treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No parameter of either cultivar recovered when plants were returned to optimum temperature without rewatering.

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise1
Treatment
returned to the optimum temperature but still unwaterede2
Outcome
recovery for any parameterse2
Direction
no recoverye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–334 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was no recovery for any parameters of either cultivar when plants were returned to the optimum temperature but still unwatered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous drought and heat stress could cause permanent physiological damage in Kentucky bluegrass (author interpretation).

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise1
Treatment
simultaneous drought and heat stresse1
Outcome
permanent physiological damagee1
Qualifier
could causee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results suggested that simultaneous drought and heat stress could cause permanent physiological damage for Kentucky bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering was essential for physiological recovery from the combined stress, regardless of temperature (author interpretation).

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise1
Treatment
Rewateringe2
Outcome
physiological recoverye2
Qualifier
regardless of temperature conditionse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–334 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rewatering was essential for physiological recovery from the combined stress, regardless of temperature conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1872 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapid resumption of Fv/Fm, cell membrane stability and antioxidant activities contributed to recovery of Kentucky bluegrass (author interpretation).

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise1
Outcome
recoverye1
Qualifier
Rapid resumption of Fv/Fm, cell membrane stability, and antioxidant activitiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rapid resumption of Fv/Fm, cell membrane stability, and antioxidant activities were important factors contributing to the recovery of Kentucky bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–2026 · show in text ↑

rewatering · physiology: photosynthesis · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

heat · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.