Paper · 1979 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Stomatal Response of Populus Clones to Light Intensity and Vapor Pressure Deficit

Stephen G. Pallardy; Theodore T. Kozlowski

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Responses of stomata of clones of Populus candicans Ait. x P. berolinensis Dipp. and Populus deltoides Bartr. x P. caudina (Ten.) Bugala to two levels of light intensity and vapor pressure deficit were studied in controlled environments. Significant stomatal responses to light and vapor pressure deficit were observed. Interactive effects of low light intensity and high vapor pressure deficit elicited greater stomatal closure than was obtained under low light or high vapor pressure deficit alone, indicating adaptation for increased water use efficiency under conditions unfavorable for photosynthesis relative to transpiration. Adaxial stomata of both clones were more sensitive than abaxial stomata to changing vapor pressure deficit and light intensity. Stomatal response to vapor pressure deficit appeared to be independent of bulk leaf water status. Stomata of P. candicans x P. berolinensis were more sensitive than stomata of P. deltoides x P. caudina to a change in vapor pressure deficit and less sensitive to a change in light intensity. The sensitivity of stomata of P. candicans x P. berolinensis to vapor pressure deficit may be related to drought resistance in its parentage (P. berolinensis).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Populus stomata responded significantly to light intensity.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
stomatal responsese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant stomatal responses to light and vapor pressure deficit were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–318 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Populus stomata responded significantly to vapor pressure deficit.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
vapor pressure deficite0
Outcome
stomatal responsese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant stomatal responses to light and vapor pressure deficit were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–318 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light and high vapor pressure deficit together caused greater stomatal closure than either alone.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
low light intensity and high vapor pressure deficite0
Outcome
stomatal closuree0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
low light or high vapor pressure deficit alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interactive effects of low light intensity and high vapor pressure deficit elicited greater stomatal closure than was obtained under low light or high vapor pressure deficit alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–35 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined stomatal response indicates adaptation for higher water use efficiency under unfavorable photosynthesis-to-transpiration conditions.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Outcome
increased water use efficiencye0
Qualifier
conditions unfavorable for photosynthesis relative to transpiratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicating adaptation for increased water use efficiency under conditions unfavorable for photosynthesis relative to transpiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adaxial stomata of both Populus clones were more sensitive than abaxial stomata to changing vapor pressure deficit and light intensity.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Organ / stage
Adaxial stomatae0
Outcome
sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
abaxial stomatae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adaxial stomata of both clones were more sensitive than abaxial stomata to changing vapor pressure deficit and light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–35 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Populus stomatal response to vapor pressure deficit appeared independent of bulk leaf water status.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Stomatal response to vapor pressure deficite0
Qualifier
independent of bulk leaf water statuse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal response to vapor pressure deficit appeared to be independent of bulk leaf water status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus Clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomata of P. candicans x P. berolinensis were more sensitive to vapor pressure deficit than those of P. deltoides x P. caudina.

Taxon
P. candicans x P. berolinensisPopulus candicanse0
Material
P. candicans x P. berolinensise0
Outcome
sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
P. deltoides x P. caudinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus candicans
Populus candicans · TaxonNationaal Archief · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomata of P. candicans x P. berolinensis were more sensitive than stomata of P. deltoides x P. caudina to a change in vapor pressure deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1000 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomata of P. candicans x P. berolinensis were less sensitive to light change than those of P. deltoides x P. caudina.

Taxon
P. candicans x P. berolinensisPopulus candicanse0
Material
P. candicans x P. berolinensise0
Outcome
sensitive to a change in light intensitye0
Direction
less sensitivee0
Comparator
P. deltoides x P. caudinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus candicans
Populus candicans · TaxonNationaal Archief · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomata of P. candicans x P. berolinensis were more sensitive than stomata of P. deltoides x P. caudina to a change in vapor pressure deficit and less sensitive to a change in light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1050 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitivity of P. candicans x P. berolinensis stomata to vapor pressure deficit may relate to drought resistance in P. berolinensis parentage.

Taxon
P. candicans x P. berolinensisPopulus candicanse0
Material
P. berolinensise0
Outcome
sensitivity of stomatae0
Qualifier
may be related to drought resistancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus candicans
Populus candicans · TaxonNationaal Archief · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sensitivity of stomata of P. candicans x P. berolinensis to vapor pressure deficit may be related to drought resistance in its parentage (P. berolinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1210 · show in text ↑