Paper · 2002 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Chemical composition and nutritional attributes of selected newly developed lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr)

Sunday Y Giami

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The chemical composition and nutritional properties of raw, autoclaved and boiled samples of three promising advanced breeding lines of soybean (TG x 923 − 2 EN , TG x 1019 − 2 EN and TG x 1497 − 1 D ), part of a larger collection evaluated in agronomic field trials in Nigeria, were investigated. Protein quality was evaluated using weanling albino rats fed diets which were formulated to supply 10% protein using soybean samples, with casein as a control. Raw seeds contained 35.6–42.4% crude protein, 8.9–9.8 mg iron per 100 g, 8.62–18.21 mg trypsin inhibitor g −1 and 2.25–6.15 mg phytic acid g −1 seed flour. TG x 923 − 2 EN possessed higher crude protein contents and lower amounts of trypsin inhibitor, polyphenol and phytic acid compared with TG x 1019 − 2 EN or TG x 1497 − 1 D . Boiling proved more effective than autoclaving for reducing the levels of antinutrients and improving the protein quality of the beans, as shown by the higher values for weight gain, protein efficiency ratio (PER), net protein ratio (NPR) and true digestibility (TD) of boiled samples. There were no significant ( p > 0.05) differences between the values obtained for PER, NPR and TD of diets containing boiled samples of TG x 923 − 2 EN and casein, indicating the nutritional superiority of this soybean line compared with TG x 1019 − 2 EN and TG x 1497 − 1 D . © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raw soybean seeds contained 35.6–42.4% crude protein.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
Raw seedse1
Outcome
crude proteine1
Value
35.6–42.4%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Raw seeds contained 35.6–42.4% crude protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–511 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raw soybean seeds contained 8.9–9.8 mg iron per 100 g.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
irone2
Value
8.9–9.8 mge2
Qualifier
per 100 ge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“8.9–9.8 mg iron per 100 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–538 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raw soybean seeds contained 8.62–18.21 mg trypsin inhibitor per g.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
trypsin inhibitore3
Value
8.62–18.21 mge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“8.62–18.21 mg trypsin inhibitor g −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–576 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raw soybean seeds contained 2.25–6.15 mg phytic acid per g of seed flour.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
seed floure4
Outcome
phytic acide4
Value
2.25–6.15 mge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“2.25–6.15 mg phytic acid g −1 seed flour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–621 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line TG x 923 − 2 EN had higher crude protein content than lines TG x 1019 − 2 EN or TG x 1497 − 1 D.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
TG x 923 − 2 ENe5
Outcome
crude protein contentse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
TG x 1019 − 2 EN or TG x 1497 − 1 De5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–115 · show in text ↑
e5

“TG x 923 − 2 EN possessed higher crude protein contents and lower amounts of trypsin inhibitor, polyphenol and phytic acid compared with TG x 1019 − 2 EN or TG x 1497 − 1 D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–795 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line TG x 923 − 2 EN had lower trypsin inhibitor, polyphenol and phytic acid than lines TG x 1019 − 2 EN or TG x 1497 − 1 D.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
TG x 923 − 2 ENe5
Outcome
trypsin inhibitor, polyphenol and phytic acide5
Direction
lowere5
Comparator
TG x 1019 − 2 EN or TG x 1497 − 1 De5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–115 · show in text ↑
e5

“TG x 923 − 2 EN possessed higher crude protein contents and lower amounts of trypsin inhibitor, polyphenol and phytic acid compared with TG x 1019 − 2 EN or TG x 1497 − 1 D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boiling was more effective than autoclaving for reducing antinutrient levels and improving protein quality of soybean beans.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
beanse6
Treatment
Boilinge6
Outcome
levels of antinutrients and improving the protein qualitye6
Direction
more effectivee6
Comparator
autoclavinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“Boiling proved more effective than autoclaving for reducing the levels of antinutrients and improving the protein quality of the beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–932 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boiled samples had higher weight gain, protein efficiency ratio and net protein ratio in rats.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
boiled samplese7
Outcome
weight gain, protein efficiency ratio (PER), net protein ratio (NPR)e7
Direction
highere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–115 · show in text ↑
e7

“as shown by the higher values for weight gain, protein efficiency ratio (PER), net protein ratio (NPR) and true digestibility (TD) of boiled samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1082 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boiled samples had higher true digestibility in rats.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
boiled samplese7
Outcome
true digestibility (TD)e7
Direction
highere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–115 · show in text ↑
e7

“as shown by the higher values for weight gain, protein efficiency ratio (PER), net protein ratio (NPR) and true digestibility (TD) of boiled samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diets with boiled samples of TG x 923 − 2 EN did not differ from casein in PER, NPR and TD.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
boiled samples of TG x 923 − 2 ENe1
Outcome
values obtained for PER, NPR and TDe1
Direction
no significante1
Comparator
caseine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were no significant ( p > 0.05) differences between the values obtained for PER, NPR and TD of diets containing boiled samples of TG x 923 − 2 EN and casein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1246 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.