Paper · 2003 · Agronomy Journal

Sprinkler-Induced Flower Losses and Yield Reductions in Cotton ( L.)

John J. Burke

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen is highly sensitive to water, rupturing within 1 to 2 min of contact. Flowers sprayed with known volumes of water showed that a single spray with 1 mL of water reduced seed set by 55%. Additional spray applications resulted in further losses and ultimately flower shedding. Field studies in 2000 and 2001 used a center pivot equipped with sprinklers and drag socks to determine the effect of timing and water application methods on fruit losses. Treatments included different application times (0800 to 1000 h, 1000 to 1200 h, 1200 to 1400 h, and 1400 to 1600 h) with 77 m3 of water. The plots were irrigated eight times from 1 Aug. to 1 Sept. 2000 and 11 times from 10 July to 21 Aug. 2001. Flowers were tagged before irrigation and tracked throughout the season. No significant differences in fruit losses were observed in the 0800- to 1000-h treatment; however, fruit losses progressively increased under the sprinkler treatments compared with the drag sock treatments as the day progressed. Maximum fruit losses occurred in the 1400- to 1600-h treatments. The time course of sprinkler-induced fruit losses tracked the opening of the flower and dehiscence of the pollen. Evaluation of seasonal lint yields showed a 21% reduction in 2000 and 11% yield reduction in 2001 under sprinkler irrigation compared with drag sock irrigation. These results emphasize the need to use production practices that limit water contact with open cotton flowers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton pollen ruptures within 1 to 2 min of contact with water.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Organ / stage
pollene0
Outcome
rupturinge0
Value
1 to 2 mine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen is highly sensitive to water, rupturing within 1 to 2 min of contact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single spray of 1 mL of water reduced cotton seed set by 55%.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Organ / stage
Flowerse1
Treatment
a single spray with 1 mL of watere1
Outcome
seed sete1
Direction
reducede1
Value
55%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen is highly sensitive to water, rupturing within 1 to 2 min of contact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Flowers sprayed with known volumes of water showed that a single spray with 1 mL of water reduced seed set by 55%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional spray applications resulted in further cotton flower shedding.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
Additional spray applicationse2
Outcome
flower sheddinge2
Direction
resulted in further lossese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen is highly sensitive to water, rupturing within 1 to 2 min of contact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e2

“Additional spray applications resulted in further losses and ultimately flower shedding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit losses did not differ significantly among cotton plants in the 0800- to 1000-h irrigation treatment.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
0800- to 1000-h treatmente3
Outcome
fruit lossese3
Direction
No significant differencese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen is highly sensitive to water, rupturing within 1 to 2 min of contact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e3

“No significant differences in fruit losses were observed in the 0800- to 1000-h treatment; however, fruit losses progressively increased under the sprinkler treatments compared with the drag sock treatments as the day progressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit losses under sprinkler irrigation progressively increased compared with drag sock irrigation as the day progressed.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
sprinkler treatmentse3
Outcome
fruit lossese3
Direction
progressively increasede3
Qualifier
as the day progressede3
Comparator
drag sock treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen is highly sensitive to water, rupturing within 1 to 2 min of contact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e3

“No significant differences in fruit losses were observed in the 0800- to 1000-h treatment; however, fruit losses progressively increased under the sprinkler treatments compared with the drag sock treatments as the day progressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum cotton fruit losses occurred in the 1400- to 1600-h irrigation treatments.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
1400- to 1600-h treatmentse4
Outcome
fruit lossese4
Direction
Maximume4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen is highly sensitive to water, rupturing within 1 to 2 min of contact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e4

“Maximum fruit losses occurred in the 1400- to 1600-h treatments. The time course of sprinkler-induced fruit losses tracked the opening of the flower and dehiscence of the pollen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1210 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler-induced fruit losses over time tracked flower opening and pollen dehiscence in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Organ / stage
the opening of the flowere4
Outcome
time course of sprinkler-induced fruit lossese4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen is highly sensitive to water, rupturing within 1 to 2 min of contact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e4

“Maximum fruit losses occurred in the 1400- to 1600-h treatments. The time course of sprinkler-induced fruit losses tracked the opening of the flower and dehiscence of the pollen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation reduced seasonal cotton lint yield by 21% compared with drag sock irrigation in 2000.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
sprinkler irrigatione5
Outcome
seasonal lint yieldse5
Direction
reductione5
Value
21%e5
Qualifier
in 2000e5
Comparator
drag sock irrigatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen is highly sensitive to water, rupturing within 1 to 2 min of contact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e5

“Evaluation of seasonal lint yields showed a 21% reduction in 2000 and 11% yield reduction in 2001 under sprinkler irrigation compared with drag sock irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation reduced seasonal cotton lint yield by 11% compared with drag sock irrigation in 2001.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
sprinkler irrigatione5
Outcome
seasonal lint yieldse5
Direction
yield reductione5
Value
11%e5
Qualifier
in 2001e5
Comparator
drag sock irrigatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen is highly sensitive to water, rupturing within 1 to 2 min of contact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e5

“Evaluation of seasonal lint yields showed a 21% reduction in 2000 and 11% yield reduction in 2001 under sprinkler irrigation compared with drag sock irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1371 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Production practices that limit water contact with open cotton flowers are needed.

Outcome
production practices that limit water contact with open cotton flowerse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“These results emphasize the need to use production practices that limit water contact with open cotton flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1483 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 304 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.