Paper · 1986 · Agronomy Journal

Response of Corn to Tillage and Delayed Irrigation1

I. Porro; D. K. Cassel

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Irrigation in humid regions is often delayed based on forecasted rainfall or due to labor shortages or equipment problems. The effects of tillage and delayed irrigation on corn ( Zea mays L.) were investigated in 1982 and 1983 on a Norfolk loamy sand (Typic Paleudult) with a tillage pan. Irrigation treatments were: optimum irrigation when tensiometer measured soil water pressure at the 25‐ or 30‐cm depth was −40kPa; 2‐day and 4‐day delays after irrigation was needed; and a nonirrigated control. Each irrigation treatment was superimposed on land prepared by two tillage treatments: (i) conventional and (ii) subsoiling and bedding. Delayed irrigation during a wet growing season (1982) had little effect on corn growth. Delayed irrigation during the dry growing season (1983) reduced plant height, leaf area, biomass, and grain yield on conventionally tilled soil but only grain yield on subsoiled plots. With a 4‐day irrigation delay, grain yields were reduced 29% below the 10.22 Mg ha −1 yield for conventional tillage but only 11% below the maximum of 10.56 Mg ha −1 for subsoiling. Irrigation in 1982 increased mean grain yield of all three delay treatments by 23 and 1% for conventionally tilled and subsoiled treatments, respectively. In 1983, these increases were 314 and 18%, respectively. A 1‐yr subsoiling carryover (1983) resulted in a yield of 8.89 Mg ha −1 vs. a current‐year subsoiled yield of 10.68 Mg ha −1 . A 2‐yr carryover (1982) resulted in a yield of 9.60 vs. 10.60 Mg ha −1 from current year subsoiling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed irrigation had little effect on corn growth in wet 1982.

Treatment
Delayed irrigatione0
Outcome
corn growthe0
Direction
little effecte0
Setting
wet growing season (1982)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed irrigation during a wet growing season (1982) had little effect on corn growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed irrigation in dry 1983 reduced height, leaf area and biomass under conventional tillage.

Treatment
Delayed irrigatione0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area, biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
conventionally tilled soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed irrigation during the dry growing season (1983) reduced plant height, leaf area, biomass, and grain yield on conventionally tilled soil but only grain yield on subsoiled plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed irrigation in dry 1983 reduced corn grain yield under conventional tillage.

Treatment
Delayed irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
conventionally tilled soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed irrigation during the dry growing season (1983) reduced plant height, leaf area, biomass, and grain yield on conventionally tilled soil but only grain yield on subsoiled plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed irrigation in dry 1983 reduced corn grain yield on subsoiled plots.

Treatment
Delayed irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
subsoiled plotse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed irrigation during the dry growing season (1983) reduced plant height, leaf area, biomass, and grain yield on conventionally tilled soil but only grain yield on subsoiled plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four-day irrigation delay reduced conventional-tillage grain yield by 29%.

Treatment
4‐day irrigation delaye0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
10.22 Mg ha −1 yielde0
Setting
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With a 4‐day irrigation delay, grain yields were reduced 29% below the 10.22 Mg ha −1 yield for conventional tillage but only 11% below the maximum of 10.56 Mg ha −1 for subsoiling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four-day irrigation delay reduced subsoiled grain yield by 11%.

Treatment
4‐day irrigation delaye0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
belowe0
Value
11%e0
Qualifier
10.56 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
maximume0
Setting
subsoilinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With a 4‐day irrigation delay, grain yields were reduced 29% below the 10.22 Mg ha −1 yield for conventional tillage but only 11% below the maximum of 10.56 Mg ha −1 for subsoiling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised 1982 conventional-tillage mean grain yield by 23%.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
mean grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23e0
Setting
conventionally tillede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation in 1982 increased mean grain yield of all three delay treatments by 23 and 1% for conventionally tilled and subsoiled treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised 1982 subsoiled mean grain yield by 1%.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
mean grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1%e0
Setting
subsoilede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation in 1982 increased mean grain yield of all three delay treatments by 23 and 1% for conventionally tilled and subsoiled treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised 1983 conventional-tillage grain yield by 314%.

Treatment
Irrigationt1
Outcome
grain yieldt1
Direction
increasese0
Value
314e0
Setting
conventionally tilledt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1983, these increases were 314 and 18%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
t1

“Irrigation in 1982 increased mean grain yield of all three delay treatments by 23 and 1% for conventionally tilled and subsoiled treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised 1983 subsoiled grain yield by 18%.

Treatment
Irrigationt1
Outcome
grain yieldt1
Direction
increasese0
Value
18%e0
Setting
subsoiledt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1983, these increases were 314 and 18%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
t1

“Irrigation in 1982 increased mean grain yield of all three delay treatments by 23 and 1% for conventionally tilled and subsoiled treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-year subsoiling carryover yielded 8.89 Mg ha −1 versus 10.68 Mg ha −1 after current-year subsoiling.

Treatment
1‐yr subsoiling carryovere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
8.89 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
10.68 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
current‐year subsoilede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 1‐yr subsoiling carryover (1983) resulted in a yield of 8.89 Mg ha −1 vs. a current‐year subsoiled yield of 10.68 Mg ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-year subsoiling carryover yielded 9.60 Mg ha −1 versus 10.60 Mg ha −1 after current-year subsoiling.

Treatment
2‐yr carryovere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
9.60e0
Qualifier
10.60 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
current year subsoilinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2‐yr carryover (1982) resulted in a yield of 9.60 vs. 10.60 Mg ha −1 from current year subsoiling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

289 papers: 208 positive, 81 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 208 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

285 papers more in this group

See all 289 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.