Paper · 1998 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

Nutrient removals with harvesting and by deep percolation from white birch (Betula papyrifera [Marsh.]) sites in central Newfoundland

Brian D. Titus; Bruce A. Roberts; Keith W. Deering

20
claims
38
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of conventional stem-only and whole-tree harvesting on nutrient losses in biomass removal and in leachate fluxes over a 3-yr period after cutting three white birch stands in central Newfoundland were determined. Losses of nutrients in biomass were proportionately greater with more intensive harvesting as tree components with higher nutrient concentrations (branches, foliage) were removed. Stem-only harvesting removed 126, 9, 51, 126 and 23 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in biomass, respectively. Whole-tree harvesting led to a 19% increase in biomass removal as compared to stem-only harvesting, but nutrient removals with whole-tree harvesting increased by 127% for N, 138% for P, 151% for K, 72% for Ca and 90% for Mg. Nutrient losses in deep percolation of soil solution during the first 3 yr after harvesting were generally greater following stem-only than whole-tree harvesting. This may be the result of increased leaching from slash, increased mineralization beneath slash, and retardation by slash of the successional vegetation that could act as a nutrient sink. In the first 3 yr following harvesting, leaching losses after whole-tree harvesting were 4, 0.2, 8, 23 and 7 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg, respectively, as compared with 9, 0.1, 7, 28 and 9 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg after stem-only harvesting. Nutrient losses in leachate were generally small compared to losses in biomass removal. Key words: Intensive harvesting; slash; nutrient budget; sustainable site productivity; Betula papyrifera (Marsh.)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More intensive harvesting caused proportionately greater biomass nutrient losses by removing nutrient-rich branches and foliage.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
more intensive harvestinge0
Outcome
Losses of nutrients in biomasse0
Qualifier
tree components with higher nutrient concentrations (branches, foliage) were removede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Losses of nutrients in biomass were proportionately greater with more intensive harvesting as tree components with higher nutrient concentrations (branches, foliage) were removed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-only harvesting removed 126 kg ha−1 nitrogen in biomass.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
Stem-only harvestinge0
Outcome
Ne0
Value
126e0
Qualifier
kg ha –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem-only harvesting removed 126, 9, 51, 126 and 23 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in biomass, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-only harvesting removed 9 kg ha−1 phosphorus in biomass.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
Stem-only harvestinge0
Outcome
Pe0
Value
9e0
Qualifier
kg ha –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem-only harvesting removed 126, 9, 51, 126 and 23 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in biomass, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-only harvesting removed 51 kg ha−1 potassium in biomass.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
Stem-only harvestinge0
Outcome
Ke0
Value
51e0
Qualifier
kg ha –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem-only harvesting removed 126, 9, 51, 126 and 23 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in biomass, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-only harvesting removed 126 kg ha−1 calcium in biomass.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
Stem-only harvestinge0
Outcome
Cae0
Value
126e0
Qualifier
kg ha –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem-only harvesting removed 126, 9, 51, 126 and 23 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in biomass, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-only harvesting removed 23 kg ha−1 magnesium in biomass.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
Stem-only harvestinge0
Outcome
Mge0
Value
23 kg ha –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem-only harvesting removed 126, 9, 51, 126 and 23 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in biomass, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-tree harvesting increased biomass removal by 19% versus stem-only harvesting.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
Whole-tree harvestinge0
Outcome
biomass removale0
Direction
increasee0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
stem-only harvestinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-tree harvesting led to a 19% increase in biomass removal as compared to stem-only harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-tree harvesting increased nitrogen removal by 127%.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
127%e0
Comparator
stem-only harvestinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient removals with whole-tree harvesting increased by 127% for N, 138% for P, 151% for K, 72% for Ca and 90% for Mg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to stem-only harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-tree harvesting increased phosphorus removal by 138%.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
138%e0
Comparator
stem-only harvestinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient removals with whole-tree harvesting increased by 127% for N, 138% for P, 151% for K, 72% for Ca and 90% for Mg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to stem-only harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-tree harvesting increased potassium removal by 151%.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Value
151%e0
Comparator
stem-only harvestinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient removals with whole-tree harvesting increased by 127% for N, 138% for P, 151% for K, 72% for Ca and 90% for Mg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to stem-only harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-tree harvesting increased calcium removal by 72%.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge0
Outcome
Cae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
72%e0
Comparator
stem-only harvestinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient removals with whole-tree harvesting increased by 127% for N, 138% for P, 151% for K, 72% for Ca and 90% for Mg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to stem-only harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-tree harvesting increased magnesium removal by 90%.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulat0
Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge0
Outcome
Mge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
90%e0
Comparator
stem-only harvestinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient removals with whole-tree harvesting increased by 127% for N, 138% for P, 151% for K, 72% for Ca and 90% for Mg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to stem-only harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep-percolation nutrient losses were generally greater after stem-only than whole-tree harvesting during three years.

Treatment
stem-onlye0
Outcome
Nutrient losses in deep percolation of soil solutione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
during the first 3 yre0
Comparator
whole-tree harvestinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient losses in deep percolation of soil solution during the first 3 yr after harvesting were generally greater following stem-only than whole-tree harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“white birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater leaching may reflect slash leaching, mineralization beneath slash and delayed successional vegetation nutrient sinks.

Outcome
increased leachinge0
Qualifier
increased leaching from slash, increased mineralization beneath slash, and retardation by slash of the successional vegetatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“This may be the result of increased leaching from slash, increased mineralization beneath slash, and retardation by slash of the successional vegetation that could act as a nutrient sink.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1088 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-year nitrogen leaching was 4 kg ha−1 after whole-tree versus 9 after stem-only harvesting.

Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
4e0
Qualifier
9, 0.1, 7, 28 and 9 kg ha –1e0
Comparator
stem-only harvestinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the first 3 yr following harvesting, leaching losses after whole-tree harvesting were 4, 0.2, 8, 23 and 7 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg, respectively, as compared with 9, 0.1, 7, 28 and 9 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg after stem-only harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1339 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-year phosphorus leaching was 0.2 kg ha−1 after whole-tree versus 0.1 after stem-only harvesting.

Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
0.2e0
Qualifier
9, 0.1, 7, 28 and 9 kg ha –1e0
Comparator
stem-only harvestinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the first 3 yr following harvesting, leaching losses after whole-tree harvesting were 4, 0.2, 8, 23 and 7 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg, respectively, as compared with 9, 0.1, 7, 28 and 9 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg after stem-only harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1339 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-year potassium leaching was 8 kg ha−1 after whole-tree versus 7 after stem-only harvesting.

Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
8e0
Qualifier
9, 0.1, 7, 28 and 9 kg ha –1e0
Comparator
stem-only harvestinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the first 3 yr following harvesting, leaching losses after whole-tree harvesting were 4, 0.2, 8, 23 and 7 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg, respectively, as compared with 9, 0.1, 7, 28 and 9 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg after stem-only harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1339 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-year calcium leaching was 23 kg ha−1 after whole-tree versus 28 after stem-only harvesting.

Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge0
Outcome
Cae0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
23e0
Qualifier
9, 0.1, 7, 28 and 9 kg ha –1e0
Comparator
stem-only harvestinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the first 3 yr following harvesting, leaching losses after whole-tree harvesting were 4, 0.2, 8, 23 and 7 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg, respectively, as compared with 9, 0.1, 7, 28 and 9 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg after stem-only harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1339 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-year magnesium leaching was 7 kg ha−1 after whole-tree versus 9 after stem-only harvesting.

Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge0
Outcome
Mge0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
7 kg ha –1e0
Qualifier
9, 0.1, 7, 28 and 9 kg ha –1e0
Comparator
stem-only harvestinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the first 3 yr following harvesting, leaching losses after whole-tree harvesting were 4, 0.2, 8, 23 and 7 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg, respectively, as compared with 9, 0.1, 7, 28 and 9 kg ha –1 of N, P, K, Ca and Mg after stem-only harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1339 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leachate nutrient losses were generally small compared with biomass-removal losses.

Outcome
Nutrient losses in leachatee0
Direction
smalle0
Comparator
losses in biomass removale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient losses in leachate were generally small compared to losses in biomass removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1427 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue