Paper · 2004 · Physiologia Plantarum

Apoplastic pH and FeIIIreduction in young sunflower (Helianthus annuus) roots

Harald Kosegarten; Bernd Hoffmann; Evan Rroco; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
41
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The relationship between the apoplastic pH in young sunflower roots ( Helianthus annuus L.) and the plasmalemma ferric chelate reductase (FC‐R; EC 1.16.1.7) activity in roots was investigated. The hypothesis was tested that a high apoplastic pH depresses FC‐R activity, thereby restricting the uptake of Fe 2+ into the cytosol. Until recently, little has been known about this relationship, because pH and redox reaction measurements are difficult to perform within the confines of the root apoplast. We recorded the apoplastic pH by means of the fluorescence ratio in conjunction with video microscopy by covalently tagging fluorescein boronic acid to OH groups of the root cell wall. Fe III reduction was measured using a similar approach by tagging ferrozine diboronic acid with OH groups of the cell wall. Ferrozine forms an Fe 2+ complex, thus indicating the reduction of ferric iron. In roots bathing in buffered outer solutions of different pH, a high pH sensitivity of apoplastic Fe III reduction was found, with the highest ferric iron reduction rates at an apoplastic pH of 4.9; above an apoplastic pH of 5.3, no reduction was observed. Nitrate in the bathing solution increased the apoplastic pH and hence depressed the Fe III reduction; ammonium had the reverse effect. Nitrate together with HCO 3 – , a combination which is typical of calcareous soils, had the strongest depressing effect. From the results, it can be concluded that the main reason for the frequently occurring iron deficiency chlorosis of plants grown on calcareous soils is the inhibition of Fe III reduction in the apoplast, and hence Fe 2+ uptake into the cytosol.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apoplastic ferric reduction was most rapid at pH 4.9.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
ferric iron reduction ratese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a high pH sensitivity of apoplastic Fe III reduction was found, with the highest ferric iron reduction rates at an apoplastic pH of 4.9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No apoplastic ferric reduction was observed above pH 5.3.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
no reductione0
Value
5.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“above an apoplastic pH of 5.3, no reduction was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate increased apoplastic pH.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Nitratee0
Outcome
apoplastic pHe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate in the bathing solution increased the apoplastic pH and hence depressed the Fe III reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate depressed apoplastic ferric reduction.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Nitratee0
Outcome
Fe III reductione0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate in the bathing solution increased the apoplastic pH and hence depressed the Fe III reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium had the reverse effect on apoplastic pH and ferric reduction relative to nitrate.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
ammoniume0
Outcome
reverse effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ammonium had the reverse effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate with bicarbonate had the strongest depressing effect.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Nitrate together with HCO 3 –e0
Outcome
depressing effecte0
Direction
strongest depressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate together with HCO 3 – , a combination which is typical of calcareous soils, had the strongest depressing effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed iron deficiency chlorosis on calcareous soils to inhibition of apoplastic ferric reduction and ferrous uptake.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
iron deficiency chlorosise0
Qualifier
inhibition of Fe III reduction in the apoplaste0
Setting
calcareous soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the main reason for the frequently occurring iron deficiency chlorosis of plants grown on calcareous soils is the inhibition of Fe III reduction in the apoplast, and hence Fe 2+ uptake into the cytosol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.