Paper · 2013 · ISRN Biotechnology

NaCl Effects on In Vitro Germination and Growth of Some Senegalese Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Cultivars

Mahamadou Thiam; Antony Champion; Diaga Diouf; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) is one of the most important grain legumes in sub-Saharian regions. It contributes to man food security by providing a protein-rich diet. However, its production is limited by abiotic stresses such as salinity. This study aims to evaluate the salt tolerance of 15 cowpea cultivars, at germination stage. The seed germination process consisted of sowing them in agarified water (8 g·L(-1)) supplemented with 6 different concentrations of NaCl (0, 10, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mM). Results highlighted that high salt concentrations drastically reduced germination and significantly delayed the process for all varieties. A cowpea varietal effect towards the salt tolerance was noticed. Genotypes Diongoma, 58-78, and 58-191 were more salt-tolerant cultivars while Mougne and Yacine were more salt-sensitive ones as confirmed in the three groups of the dendrogram. NaCl effects on the early vegetative growth of seedlings were assessed with a tolerant (58-191) and a susceptible (Yacine) cultivar. Morphological (length and dry biomass) and physiological (chlorophyll and proline contents) parameter measurements revealed a negative effect of high (NaCl). However, 58-191 was much more salt tolerant, and the chlorophyll and proline contents were higher than those of Yacine genotype at increasing salt concentrations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High NaCl concentrations drastically reduced cowpea germination.

Treatment
high salt concentrationse1
Outcome
germinatione1
Direction
drastically reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“high salt concentrations drastically reduced germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–596 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High NaCl concentrations significantly delayed the cowpea germination process.

Treatment
high salt concentrationse2
Outcome
the processe2
Direction
significantly delayede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“high salt concentrations drastically reduced germination and significantly delayed the process for all varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–652 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea salt tolerance at germination differed among varieties.

Outcome
salt tolerancee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“A cowpea varietal effect towards the salt tolerance was noticed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–717 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea genotypes Diongoma, 58-78 and 58-191 were more salt-tolerant cultivars.

Material
Diongoma, 58-78, and 58-191e4
Outcome
salt-tolerant cultivarse4
Direction
more salt-tolerante4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Genotypes Diongoma, 58-78, and 58-191 were more salt-tolerant cultivars while Mougne and Yacine were more salt-sensitive ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–844 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea genotypes Mougne and Yacine were more salt-sensitive.

Material
Mougne and Yacinee4
Outcome
salt-sensitive onese4
Direction
more salt-sensitivee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Genotypes Diongoma, 58-78, and 58-191 were more salt-tolerant cultivars while Mougne and Yacine were more salt-sensitive ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–844 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High NaCl had a negative effect on cowpea seedling length and dry biomass.

Treatment
high (NaCl)e5
Outcome
length and dry biomasse5
Direction
negative effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Morphological (length and dry biomass) and physiological (chlorophyll and proline contents) parameter measurements revealed a negative effect of high (NaCl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1186 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High NaCl had a negative effect on cowpea chlorophyll and proline contents.

Treatment
high (NaCl)e5
Outcome
chlorophyll and proline contentse5
Direction
negative effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Morphological (length and dry biomass) and physiological (chlorophyll and proline contents) parameter measurements revealed a negative effect of high (NaCl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1186 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea genotype 58-191 was much more salt tolerant than Yacine.

Material
58-191e7
Outcome
salt tolerante7
Direction
much more salt tolerante7
Comparator
Yacine genotypee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“However, 58-191 was much more salt tolerant, and the chlorophyll and proline contents were higher than those of Yacine genotype at increasing salt concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1349 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea genotype 58-191 had higher chlorophyll and proline contents than Yacine at increasing salt concentrations.

Material
58-191e7
Treatment
increasing salt concentrationse7
Outcome
chlorophyll and proline contentse7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
Yacine genotypee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“However, 58-191 was much more salt tolerant, and the chlorophyll and proline contents were higher than those of Yacine genotype at increasing salt concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1349 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

22 papers: 6 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

sodium chloride · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

salinity · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

63 papers: 6 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.