Abstract
본 연구에서는 IRG-Alfalfa 사일리지 제조시 젖산균과 클로렐라를 처리하여 사일리지의 사료가치, 품질 및 미생물상의 변화를 조사하였다. IRG-Alfalfa 사일리지 제조시 대조구와 클로렐라와 젖산균 공용 처리구의 조단백질 함량은 비슷한 수준을 보였으며 섬유소와 TDN 함량 그리고 in vitro 건물소화율 처리구에서는 차이를 나타나지 않았다. IRG-Alfalfa 사일리지 제조시 클로렐라와 젖산균 공용 처리시 pH가 감소되었다. 젖산함량은 대조구에 비해 젖산균 단독처리구에서 증가되었으며(p<0.05), 클로렐라와 젖산균 공용 처리구에서는 젖산함량이 현저하게 증가하였다(p<0.05). 그리고 젖산균 단독처리구의 젖산균 수는 대조구에 비해 현저하게 증가하였으며(p<0.05). 또한 클로렐라와 젖산균 공용처리구도 현저하게 증가하였다(p<0.05). 이상의 결과를 요약해 보면 IRG-Alfalfa 사일리지 제조시 젖산균과 클로렐라 처리에 의해 사일리지의 품질이 향상되었다. To provide the basic data on the utilization of chlorella as a method to improve the quality of forage, we examined the effect of the addition of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and chlorella on the change of nutritive value, quality and microbes on Italian ryegrass and alfalfa mixture silage (IRG-Alfalfa silage). The nutritive values of IRG-Alfalfa silage were not significantly different in all treatments. The pH of IRG-Alfalfa silage decreased in both LAB and chlorella treatments. Further the content of lactic acid in the LAB treatment increased as compared to the control, and also significantly increased in the treatment of LAB with chlorella (p<0.05). In addition, the number of LAB increased in lactic acid bacteria treatment as compared to the control, and also increased in the treatment of LAB with chlorella (p<0.05). Therefore, we suggest that LAB and chlorella would improve the quality of IRG-Alfalfa silage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Nutritive values of the silage were not significantly different among treatments.
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrass and alfalfa
Medicago sativa
Lolium multiflorume1 - Treatment
- lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and chlorellae2
- Outcome
- nutritive valuese0
- Direction
- not significantly differente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The nutritive values of IRG-Alfalfa silage were not significantly different in all treatments”
e1“Italian ryegrass and alfalfa mixture silage”
e2“the addition of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and chlorella”
Claim · model-written summary
The pH of the silage decreased in both the LAB and chlorella treatments.
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrass and alfalfa
Medicago sativa
Lolium multiflorume1 - Treatment
- LAB and chlorella treatmentse0
- Outcome
- pHe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The pH of IRG-Alfalfa silage decreased in both LAB and chlorella treatments”
e1“Italian ryegrass and alfalfa mixture silage”
Claim · model-written summary
Lactic acid content increased in the LAB treatment compared with the control.
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrass and alfalfa
Medicago sativa
Lolium multiflorume1 - Treatment
- LAB treatmente0
- Outcome
- content of lactic acide0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“the content of lactic acid in the LAB treatment increased as compared to the control”
e1“Italian ryegrass and alfalfa mixture silage”
Claim · model-written summary
Lactic acid content increased significantly in the LAB with chlorella treatment (p<0.05).
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrass and alfalfa
Medicago sativa
Lolium multiflorume1 - Treatment
- treatment of LAB with chlorellae0
- Outcome
- content of lactic acide0
- Direction
- significantly increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“the content of lactic acid in the LAB treatment increased as compared to the control, and also significantly increased in the treatment of LAB with chlorella (p<0.05)”
e1“Italian ryegrass and alfalfa mixture silage”
Claim · model-written summary
The number of LAB increased in the lactic acid bacteria treatment compared with the control.
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrass and alfalfa
Medicago sativa
Lolium multiflorume1 - Treatment
- lactic acid bacteria treatmente0
- Outcome
- number of LABe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“the number of LAB increased in lactic acid bacteria treatment as compared to the control”
e1“Italian ryegrass and alfalfa mixture silage”
Claim · model-written summary
The number of LAB also increased in the LAB with chlorella treatment (p<0.05).
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrass and alfalfa
Medicago sativa
Lolium multiflorume1 - Treatment
- treatment of LAB with chlorellae0
- Outcome
- number of LABe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“the number of LAB increased in lactic acid bacteria treatment as compared to the control, and also increased in the treatment of LAB with chlorella (p<0.05)”
e1“Italian ryegrass and alfalfa mixture silage”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that LAB and chlorella would improve the quality of the Italian ryegrass-alfalfa silage.
Verbatim
e0“we suggest that LAB and chlorella would improve the quality of IRG-Alfalfa silage”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · soil: chemistry · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
71 papers more in this group
See all 75 papers →inoculation · soil: chemistry · Lolium multiflorum (Italian ryegrass)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Lolium multiflorum (Italian ryegrass)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.