Abstract
The effects of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) mixtures on low moisture Italian ryegrass (IRG) silage fermentation was evaluated in field conditions. The experiment was categorized into two groups: Un-inoculated (Control) and Inoculated with LAB mixture for four storage periods (45, 90, 180, and 365 days, respectively). Silage inoculated with the LAB mixture had the lowest pH with highest lactic acid production than the control from beginning at 45-365 days at all moistures. Higher LAB counts were observed in inoculated silages than the control silages at whole experimental periods. It is a key reason for the rapid acidification and higher lactic acid production in silages during the storage periods. Overall results suggest that an adding of LAB mixture had positive effects on the increasing aerobic stability of silage and preserved its quality for an extended duration.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
LAB mixture inoculation gave silage with the lowest pH compared with the control.
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrass
Lolium multiflorumt0 - Treatment
- LAB mixturee1
- Interactor
- LABe1other
- Outcome
- pHe1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Comparator
- the controle1
- Setting
- field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Silage inoculated with the LAB mixture had the lowest pH with highest lactic acid production than the control”
e0“low moisture Italian ryegrass (IRG) silage fermentation was evaluated in field conditions”
t0“Low Moisture Italian Ryegrass Silage Fermentation”
Claim · model-written summary
LAB mixture inoculation gave the highest lactic acid production compared with the control.
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorumt0
- Treatment
- LAB mixturee1
- Interactor
- LABe1other
- Outcome
- lactic acid productione1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- the controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Silage inoculated with the LAB mixture had the lowest pH with highest lactic acid production than the control”
e0“low moisture Italian ryegrass (IRG) silage fermentation was evaluated in field conditions”
t0“Low Moisture Italian Ryegrass Silage Fermentation”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated silages had higher LAB counts than control silages throughout the storage periods.
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorumt0
- Treatment
- inoculated silagese2
- Interactor
- LABe2other
- Outcome
- LAB countse2
- Direction
- Highere2
- Comparator
- the control silagese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Higher LAB counts were observed in inoculated silages than the control silages at whole experimental periods”
t0“Low Moisture Italian Ryegrass Silage Fermentation”
Claim · model-written summary
Rapid acidification in LAB-inoculated silage is attributed to the higher lactic acid production.
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorumt0
- Compound
- lactic acide3
- Outcome
- rapid acidificatione3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“It is a key reason for the rapid acidification and higher lactic acid production in silages during the storage periods”
t0“Low Moisture Italian Ryegrass Silage Fermentation”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding the LAB mixture increased aerobic stability of the silage.
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorumt0
- Treatment
- adding of LAB mixturee4
- Outcome
- aerobic stabilitye4
- Direction
- increasinge4
- Comparator
- Un-inoculated (Control)e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Overall results suggest that an adding of LAB mixture had positive effects on the increasing aerobic stability of silage and preserved its quality for an extended duration”
e5“Un-inoculated (Control) and Inoculated with LAB mixture”
t0“Low Moisture Italian Ryegrass Silage Fermentation”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding the LAB mixture preserved silage quality for an extended duration.
- Taxon
- Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorumt0
- Treatment
- adding of LAB mixturee4
- Outcome
- qualitye4
- Direction
- preservede4
- Qualifier
- for an extended duratione4
- Comparator
- Un-inoculated (Control)e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Overall results suggest that an adding of LAB mixture had positive effects on the increasing aerobic stability of silage and preserved its quality for an extended duration”
e5“Un-inoculated (Control) and Inoculated with LAB mixture”
t0“Low Moisture Italian Ryegrass Silage Fermentation”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · quality: postharvest · Lolium multiflorum (Italian ryegrass)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
inoculation · quality: general · Lolium multiflorum (Italian ryegrass)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
inoculation · yield · Lolium multiflorum (Italian ryegrass)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
inoculation · soil: chemistry · Lolium multiflorum (Italian ryegrass)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Lolium multiflorum (Italian ryegrass)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.