Paper · 1982 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

COOKING QUALITY, YIELD AND SEED WEIGHT OF FIELD PEAS AS AFFECTED BY IRRIGATION, NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND HARVEST DATE

G. H. GUBBELS; S. T. ALI-KHAN; B. B. CHUBEY; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The yellow-seeded field pea (Pisum sativum L. ’Century’) was grown at two levels of soil moisture, two levels of N and P and harvested at four dates in a 3-yr field study to determine the effects of these factors on cooking quality as indicated by the color, weight and viscosity of the puree of cooked samples. Nitrogen lowered cooking quality where yields were not improved but maintained quality when yield was increased. Phosphorus applications improved yield and cooking quality, with highest improvements in yield coinciding with greatest improvements in quality. Harvesting too early or too late resulted in lower cooking quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen lowered field pea cooking quality where yields were not improved.

Taxon
field peae0
Material
Centurye0
Treatment
Nitrogene1
Outcome
cooking qualitye1
Direction
lowerede1
Qualifier
where yields were not improvede1
Setting
3-yr field studye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The yellow-seeded field pea (Pisum sativum L. ’Century’) was grown at two levels of soil moisture, two levels of N and P and harvested at four dates in a 3-yr field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen lowered cooking quality where yields were not improved but maintained quality when yield was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen maintained field pea cooking quality when yield was increased.

Taxon
field peae0
Material
Centurye0
Treatment
Nitrogene1
Outcome
cooking qualitye1
Direction
maintainede1
Qualifier
when yield was increasede1
Setting
3-yr field studye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The yellow-seeded field pea (Pisum sativum L. ’Century’) was grown at two levels of soil moisture, two levels of N and P and harvested at four dates in a 3-yr field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen lowered cooking quality where yields were not improved but maintained quality when yield was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus applications improved field pea yield.

Taxon
field peae0
Material
Centurye0
Treatment
Phosphorus applicationse2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
improvede2
Setting
3-yr field studye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The yellow-seeded field pea (Pisum sativum L. ’Century’) was grown at two levels of soil moisture, two levels of N and P and harvested at four dates in a 3-yr field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phosphorus applications improved yield and cooking quality, with highest improvements in yield coinciding with greatest improvements in quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus applications improved field pea cooking quality.

Taxon
field peae0
Material
Centurye0
Treatment
Phosphorus applicationse2
Outcome
cooking qualitye2
Direction
improvede2
Setting
3-yr field studye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The yellow-seeded field pea (Pisum sativum L. ’Century’) was grown at two levels of soil moisture, two levels of N and P and harvested at four dates in a 3-yr field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phosphorus applications improved yield and cooking quality, with highest improvements in yield coinciding with greatest improvements in quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–568 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest yield improvements under phosphorus coincided with the greatest cooking quality improvements.

Taxon
field peae0
Material
Centurye0
Treatment
Phosphorus applicationse2
Outcome
improvements in yield coinciding with greatest improvements in qualitye2
Direction
higheste2
Setting
3-yr field studye0

Verbatim

e0

“The yellow-seeded field pea (Pisum sativum L. ’Century’) was grown at two levels of soil moisture, two levels of N and P and harvested at four dates in a 3-yr field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phosphorus applications improved yield and cooking quality, with highest improvements in yield coinciding with greatest improvements in quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting field pea too early or too late lowered cooking quality.

Taxon
field peae0
Material
Centurye0
Treatment
Harvesting too early or too latee3
Outcome
cooking qualitye3
Direction
lowere3
Setting
3-yr field studye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The yellow-seeded field pea (Pisum sativum L. ’Century’) was grown at two levels of soil moisture, two levels of N and P and harvested at four dates in a 3-yr field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e3

“Harvesting too early or too late resulted in lower cooking quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–636 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 57 positive, 8 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · quality: grain · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.