Paper · 1997

Dry matter accumulation and nitrogen partitioning between shoot and root of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars

Subodha Gunawardena; B. A. McKenzie; G. D. Hill; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Dry matter and nitrogen (N) accumulation of three field pea cultivars having different morphological characters were compared under different levels of nitrogen in a field trial conducted in 1996/1997. The cultivars used were Allure (semi-leafless, semi-erect), Beacon (conventional, determinate) and Whero (conventional, indeterminate and scrambling). The N rates were 0, 30 and 60 kg/ha applied at 26 days after sowing (DAS). Shoot growth was measured at fortnightly intervals beginning from the initiation of the N treatments, while roots were sampled at 26, 40, 54 and 82 DAS. Cultivar differences in shoot growth were usually significant while N application had no influence on shoot dry matter accumulation. Throughout most of the growing season, Allure produced the highest shoot dry weight. Application of N did not affect root dry matter content at any stage for all cultivars. Beacon produced the lowest root weight at 26 and 40 DAS. However, at later stages (54 and 82 DAS) there were no significant differences among the cultivars. Allure had higher shoot to root ratios than the other cultivars. Nitrogen had no significant effect on either shoot or root N accumulation. However, cultivar differences were observed in N concentration and total N content of shoots. Allure had a lower N concentration than the other cultivars throughout most of the experimental period. Initially Beacon contained a significantly lower N content in the shoot compared with the other two cultivars. However shoot N gain in Beacon increased gradually and approached that of Allure at later growth stages. The N partitioning between shoot and root of peas was not affected by either cultivar or N application during the growing period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar differences in shoot growth were usually significant.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
shoot growthe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cultivar differences in shoot growth were usually significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N application had no influence on shoot dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
N applicatione2
Outcome
shoot dry matter accumulatione2
Direction
no influencee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“N application had no influence on shoot dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–712 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allure produced the highest shoot dry weight throughout most of the growing season.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Material
Alluree3
Outcome
shoot dry weighte3
Direction
higheste3
Qualifier
Throughout most of the growing seasone3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“Throughout most of the growing season, Allure produced the highest shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of N did not affect root dry matter content at any stage in any cultivar.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Application of Ne4
Outcome
root dry matter contente4
Direction
did not affecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of N did not affect root dry matter content at any stage for all cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–885 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beacon produced the lowest root weight at 26 and 40 days after sowing.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Material
Beacone5
Organ / stage
roote5
Outcome
root weighte5
Direction
loweste5
Qualifier
26 and 40 DASe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e5

“Beacon produced the lowest root weight at 26 and 40 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–942 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At later stages (54 and 82 days after sowing) there were no significant differences in root weight among cultivars.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
root weighte5
Qualifier
later stages (54 and 82 DAS)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e5

“Beacon produced the lowest root weight at 26 and 40 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–942 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, at later stages (54 and 82 DAS) there were no significant differences among the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen had no significant effect on shoot or root N accumulation.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Nitrogene7
Outcome
shoot or root N accumulatione7
Direction
no significant effecte7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nitrogen had no significant effect on either shoot or root N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1182 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar differences were observed in shoot N concentration and total shoot N content.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Organ / stage
shootse1
Outcome
N concentration and total N contente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, cultivar differences were observed in N concentration and total N content of shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1276 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allure had a lower shoot N concentration than the other cultivars throughout most of the experimental period.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Material
Alluree2
Outcome
N concentratione2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
throughout most of the experimental periode2
Comparator
the other cultivarse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“Allure had a lower N concentration than the other cultivars throughout most of the experimental period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1380 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Initially Beacon had a significantly lower shoot N content than the other two cultivars.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Material
Beacone3
Organ / stage
shoote3
Outcome
N content in the shoote3
Direction
lowere3
Qualifier
Initiallye3
Comparator
the other two cultivarse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“Initially Beacon contained a significantly lower N content in the shoot compared with the other two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1491 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot N gain in Beacon increased gradually and approached that of Allure at later growth stages.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Material
Beacone4
Outcome
shoot N gaine4
Direction
increased graduallye4
Qualifier
at later growth stagese4
Comparator
Alluree4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“However shoot N gain in Beacon increased gradually and approached that of Allure at later growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N application and cultivar did not affect N partitioning between shoot and root during the growing period.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
N applicatione5
Outcome
N partitioning between shoot and roote5
Direction
not affectede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e5

“The N partitioning between shoot and root of peas was not affected by either cultivar or N application during the growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1726 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allure had higher shoot to root ratios than the other cultivars.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Material
Alluree6
Outcome
shoot to root ratiose6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
the other cultivarse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–98 · show in text ↑
e6

“Allure had higher shoot to root ratios than the other cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1107 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

76 papers: 59 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.