Paper · 1971 · Physiologia Plantarum

Adverse Effect of Shoot Growth on Root Growth in Rooted Cuttings of Aspen

LENNART ELIASSON

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In experiments with rooted cuttings of aspen ( Populus tremula L). with a small leaf area, it was found that the roots grew well as long as there was no shoot growth. The onset of shoot growth was followed by a period of decreased root growth. When the leaf area had increased sufficiently, root growth recovered. Decreasing the shoot growth by removal of growth points in the shoot or by short day treatment increased the fraction of photosynthesis products used for root growth, leading to increased root/shoot ratios. Competition between growing shoots and roots for carbohydrates formed in photosynthesis is considered to cause the effects noted and to be of importance for maintaining the balance between the root and shoot systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots grew well when shoot growth was absent.

Taxon
aspent0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
roots grew welle0

Verbatim

e0

“the roots grew well as long as there was no shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth decreased after shoot growth began.

Taxon
aspent0
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
onset of shoot growthe0

Verbatim

e0

“The onset of shoot growth was followed by a period of decreased root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth recovered after leaf area increased sufficiently.

Taxon
aspent0
Organ / stage
leaf areae0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
recoverede0

Verbatim

e0

“When the leaf area had increased sufficiently, root growth recovered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing shoot growth points increased the fraction of photosynthate used for root growth.

Taxon
aspent0
Treatment
removal of growth points in the shoote0
Outcome
fraction of photosynthesis products used for root growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing the shoot growth by removal of growth points in the shoot or by short day treatment increased the fraction of photosynthesis products used for root growth, leading to increased root/shoot ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-day treatment increased the fraction of photosynthate used for root growth.

Taxon
aspent0
Treatment
short day treatmente0
Outcome
fraction of photosynthesis products used for root growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing the shoot growth by removal of growth points in the shoot or by short day treatment increased the fraction of photosynthesis products used for root growth, leading to increased root/shoot ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing shoot growth increased root/shoot ratios.

Taxon
aspent0
Treatment
Decreasing the shoot growthe0
Outcome
root/shoot ratiose0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing the shoot growth by removal of growth points in the shoot or by short day treatment increased the fraction of photosynthesis products used for root growth, leading to increased root/shoot ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the growth balance to competition for photosynthetic carbohydrates.

Taxon
aspent0
Outcome
balance between the root and shoot systemse0
Qualifier
Competition between growing shoots and roots for carbohydrates formed in photosynthesise0

Verbatim

e0

“Competition between growing shoots and roots for carbohydrates formed in photosynthesis is considered to cause the effects noted and to be of importance for maintaining the balance between the root and shoot systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑