Paper · 1971 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

The Effect of Red Irradiation on Plastid Ribosomal RNA Synthesis in Dark-grown Pea Seedlings

N. Steele Scott; Helen Nair; Robert M. Smillie

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Dark-grown pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L.) were irradiated for a short period each day with low intensity red light (662 nm), red light immediately followed by far red light (730 nm), or far red light alone. Other plants were transferred to a white light regime (14 hours light/10 hours dark). There was no change in the amount of RNA in the tissue on a fresh weight basis after the various treatments. However, compared with dark-grown seedlings, those plants irradiated with red light showed an increase in the net RNA content per stem apex. In addition there was a two- to three-fold increase in ribosomal RNA of the etioplasts relative to the total ribosomal RNA. These increases were comparable to those found in plants grown in the white light regime. The changes were much smaller if the dark-grown plants were irradiated either with red light followed by far red light, or with far red light alone. Thus continuous light is not essential for the production of ribosomal RNA in plastids, and the levels of ribosomal RNA found in chloroplasts can also be attained in etioplasts of pea leaves in the dark provided the leaf phytochrome is maintained in its active form.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amount of RNA per fresh weight of tissue did not change in dark-grown pea seedlings after the red, red plus far-red, far-red or white light treatments.

Taxon
Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
the various treatmentse1
Outcome
amount of RNAe1
Direction
no changee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark-grown pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L.) were irradiated for a short period each day with low intensity red light (662 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no change in the amount of RNA in the tissue on a fresh weight basis after the various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark-grown pea seedlings irradiated with red light showed an increase in net RNA content per stem apex compared with dark-grown seedlings.

Taxon
Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceuse0
Organ / stage
stem apexe1
Treatment
irradiated with red lighte1
Outcome
net RNA content per stem apexe1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
dark-grown seedlingse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark-grown pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L.) were irradiated for a short period each day with low intensity red light (662 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with dark-grown seedlings, those plants irradiated with red light showed an increase in the net RNA content per stem apex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light irradiation of dark-grown pea seedlings produced a two- to three-fold increase in etioplast ribosomal RNA relative to total ribosomal RNA.

Taxon
Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceuse0
Organ / stage
etioplastse2
Treatment
irradiated with red lighte1
Outcome
ribosomal RNA of the etioplasts relative to the total ribosomal RNAe2
Direction
increasee2
Value
two- to three-folde2
Comparator
dark-grown seedlingse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark-grown pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L.) were irradiated for a short period each day with low intensity red light (662 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with dark-grown seedlings, those plants irradiated with red light showed an increase in the net RNA content per stem apex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–543 · show in text ↑
e2

“there was a two- to three-fold increase in ribosomal RNA of the etioplasts relative to the total ribosomal RNA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The red-light increases in RNA were comparable to those in plants grown in a white light regime.

Taxon
Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
increasese1
Direction
comparablee1
Comparator
white light regimee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark-grown pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L.) were irradiated for a short period each day with low intensity red light (662 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“These increases were comparable to those found in plants grown in the white light regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The RNA changes were much smaller when dark-grown pea plants were irradiated with red light followed by far red light.

Taxon
Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
red light followed by far red lighte1
Outcome
The changese1
Direction
much smallere1
Comparator
dark-grown plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark-grown pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L.) were irradiated for a short period each day with low intensity red light (662 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“The changes were much smaller if the dark-grown plants were irradiated either with red light followed by far red light, or with far red light alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The RNA changes were much smaller when dark-grown pea plants were irradiated with far red light alone.

Taxon
Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
far red light alonee1
Outcome
The changese1
Direction
much smallere1
Comparator
dark-grown plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark-grown pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L.) were irradiated for a short period each day with low intensity red light (662 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“The changes were much smaller if the dark-grown plants were irradiated either with red light followed by far red light, or with far red light alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–906 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light is not essential for plastid ribosomal RNA production; chloroplast-level ribosomal RNA can be reached in etioplasts of pea leaves in the dark if leaf phytochrome is kept in its active form.

Organ / stage
etioplastse1
Outcome
production of ribosomal RNA in plastidse1
Qualifier
provided the leaf phytochrome is maintained in its active forme1

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark-grown pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L.) were irradiated for a short period each day with low intensity red light (662 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“continuous light is not essential for the production of ribosomal RNA in plastids, and the levels of ribosomal RNA found in chloroplasts can also be attained in etioplasts of pea leaves in the dark provided the leaf phytochrome is maintained in its active form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1173 · show in text ↑

radiation · molecular: metabolites · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 26 positive, 23 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.