Paper · 2003 · Crop Science

Plant Growth Regulator and Daylength Effects on Preanthesis Main Shoot and Tiller Growth in Conventional and Dwarf Oat

Pirjo Peltonen‐Sainio; Ari Rajala; Steve Simmons; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant growth regulators (PGRs) alter tiller growth in cereals. This response may be dependent on daylength (DL). Standard height (HE) and dwarf oat cultivars were grown at 14‐ and 18‐h DLs. Foliage was sprayed with chlormequat chloride (CCC) and ethephon at early growth stages to evaluate PGR effects on the growth of the main shoot and tillers. Two successive experiments with 10 replicates were arranged in two growth chambers (14‐h and 18‐h DL) at the University of Minnesota. Preanthesis main shoot and tiller HEs and dry weights (DWs) were measured. In Exp. 1, the numbers of leaves and green leaves were counted. Relative growth rate (RGR), relative elongation rate (RER), and shoot DW:HE ratio were measured. Plant growth regulators retarded growth of the main shoot in conventional oat cultivars without stimulating growth of T1 and T2 tillers. Response of the dwarf cultivar to PGRs was modest. Only ethephon enhanced T1 tiller growth at 18‐h DL. However, PGR‐treated plants had up to five more green leaves per plant at preanthesis due to stimulated leaf emergence on T3 and T4 tillers especially at the 18‐h DL. In Exp. 1, PGR treatments reduced the DW to HE ratio, that is, shortened rather than strengthened the stem. In Exp. 2, measurements were made more frequently and ethephon first increased this ratio followed by a decrease. Thus, even though long‐day conditions somewhat enhanced DW accumulation and stem elongation, few marked differences in oat response to PGR treatments were noted when comparing short‐ and long‐day conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators retarded main shoot growth in conventional oat cultivars.

Organ / stage
main shoote0
Treatment
Plant growth regulatorse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth regulators retarded growth of the main shoot in conventional oat cultivars without stimulating growth of T1 and T2 tillers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators did not stimulate T1 and T2 tiller growth.

Organ / stage
T1 and T2 tillerse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
without stimulatinge0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“without stimulating growth of T1 and T2 tillers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–852 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dwarf oat cultivar showed only a modest response to growth regulators.

Material
dwarf cultivare0
Treatment
PGRse0
Outcome
Responsee0
Direction
modeste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Response of the dwarf cultivar to PGRs was modest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon enhanced T1 tiller growth under an 18-hour daylength.

Organ / stage
T1 tillere0
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
18‐h DLe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Only ethephon enhanced T1 tiller growth at 18‐h DL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulator treated oats had up to five more green leaves by preanthesis through T3 and T4 leaf emergence.

Organ / stage
preanthesise0
Treatment
PGR‐treatede0
Outcome
green leaves per plante0
Direction
moree0
Value
up to fivee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PGR‐treated plants had up to five more green leaves per plant at preanthesis due to stimulated leaf emergence on T3 and T4 tillers especially at the 18‐h DL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 1 growth regulators reduced the dry weight to height ratio.

Treatment
PGR treatmentse0
Outcome
DW to HE ratioe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In Exp. 1, PGR treatments reduced the DW to HE ratio, that is, shortened rather than strengthened the stem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 2 ethephon first raised and then lowered the dry weight to height ratio.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
this ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
followed by a decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In Exp. 2, measurements were made more frequently and ethephon first increased this ratio followed by a decrease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long days somewhat enhanced dry weight accumulation and stem elongation.

Treatment
long‐day conditionse0
Outcome
DW accumulation and stem elongatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“long‐day conditions somewhat enhanced DW accumulation and stem elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1437 · show in text ↑

class · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.