Paper · 1980 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Regulation of Ribulose Bisphosphate Carboxylase Activity in Intact Wheat Leaves by Light, CO2, and Temperature

F. MACHLER; J. NOSBERGER

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
84
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The activity of the enzyme ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase) was estimated after rapidly extracting it from intact wheat leaves pretreated under different light and CO2 levels. No HCO3− was added to the extraction buffer since it is shown to inhibit RuBPCase. The activity increased as light intensity or CO2 concentration during pretreatment was increased. Enzyme activity increased as temperature during pretreatment was decreased. Light activation did not affect the affinity of RuBPCase for CO2. A Km of 30 μM CO2 under air level O2 was determined. CO2, light and temperature are three main limiting factors of photosynthesis. It seems that the activity of RuBPCase is regulated by these factors according to the requirements for CO2 fixation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RuBPCase activity in wheat leaves increased as light intensity or CO2 concentration during pretreatment was increased.

Treatment
light intensity or CO2 concentration during pretreatmente1
Gene
ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase)e0
Outcome
activitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of the enzyme ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase) was estimated after rapidly extracting it from intact wheat leaves pretreated under different light and CO2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“The activity increased as light intensity or CO2 concentration during pretreatment was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RuBPCase activity in wheat leaves increased as temperature during pretreatment was decreased.

Treatment
temperature during pretreatmente1
Gene
ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase)e0
Outcome
Enzyme activitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of the enzyme ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase) was estimated after rapidly extracting it from intact wheat leaves pretreated under different light and CO2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enzyme activity increased as temperature during pretreatment was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light activation did not affect the affinity of RuBPCase for CO2 in wheat leaves.

Treatment
Light activatione1
Gene
RuBPCasee1
Outcome
affinity of RuBPCase for CO2e1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of the enzyme ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase) was estimated after rapidly extracting it from intact wheat leaves pretreated under different light and CO2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“Light activation did not affect the affinity of RuBPCase for CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–509 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Km of RuBPCase for CO2 under air-level O2 was 30 μM CO2.

Gene
RuBPCasee0
Outcome
Kme1
Value
30 μM CO2e1
Qualifier
under air level O2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of the enzyme ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase) was estimated after rapidly extracting it from intact wheat leaves pretreated under different light and CO2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“A Km of 30 μM CO2 under air level O2 was determined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–562 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

RuBPCase activity in wheat may be regulated by CO2, light and temperature according to the requirements for CO2 fixation.

Outcome
activity of RuBPCasee1
Qualifier
according to the requirements for CO2 fixatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of the enzyme ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase) was estimated after rapidly extracting it from intact wheat leaves pretreated under different light and CO2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“It seems that the activity of RuBPCase is regulated by these factors according to the requirements for CO2 fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–757 · show in text ↑

light · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 14 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.