Paper · 1988 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The response of field beans (Vicia fabaL.) to irrigation and sowing date. 2. Growth and development in relation to yield

M. M. Husain; G. D. Hill; J. N. Gallagher

19
claims
39
verbatim quotes
52
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary The growth and yield of four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date were analysed in relation to leaf area expansion and senescence and their absorption and utilization of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Total dry matter (D.M.) production and seed yield were strongly correlated with total green area duration (GAD) and post-flowering GAD respectively. Total D.M. production was also strongly related to radiation absorbed by the green surfaces of the crop although autumn sowing and drought both decreased the constant of proportionality, i.e. the growth efficiency ( E g ). Autumn sowings yielded more than spring sowings because they grew for longer and received 22% more radiation. Their harvest index was also about 40% higher than in spring sowings. These more than compensated for their smaller E g . Drought decreased yield mainly by decreasing radiation received and E g . Growth duration was shorter and harvest index was smaller. The rate of phenological development was strongly dependent upon temperature and to a lesser extent on photoperiod. The average thermal duration from emergence to flowering was 790 °Cd above a base of 0 °C. The time from sowing to the end of the pod growth was well represented by a simple multiplicative model in which development rate was a linear function of temperature above a base of 0 °C and photoperiod above a base of 6 h. The average photothermal duration required for 10 crops was 980 °Cd. An attempt was also made to determine the crop physiological and environmental factors which govern the change in size of the yield components of field bean crops caused by irrigation and sowing date. The final number of pods per plant was closely correlated with the rate of supply of assimilates during pod filling. Irrigation increased assimilate flux by increasing leaf area, growth rate and total dry matter during pod growth. Both the rate and duration of pod growth were little affected by irrigation. Autumn sowings produced heavier pods and beans due to both a faster rate and a longer duration of growth which were associated with a greater production of assimilate during the seed growth period. Seed growth depends on both the current assimilate and stored reserves, the latter especially when plants were subjected to environmental stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter production was strongly correlated with total green area duration.

Taxon
field beane0
Material
Maris Beade0
Treatment
total green area duration (GAD)e1
Outcome
Total dry matter (D.M.) productione1
Direction
strongly correlatede1

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total dry matter (D.M.) production and seed yield were strongly correlated with total green area duration (GAD) and post-flowering GAD respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–408 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield was strongly correlated with post-flowering green area duration.

Taxon
field beane0
Material
Maris Beade0
Treatment
post-flowering GADe1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
strongly correlatede1

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total dry matter (D.M.) production and seed yield were strongly correlated with total green area duration (GAD) and post-flowering GAD respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–408 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter production was strongly related to radiation absorbed by the green surfaces.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
radiation absorbed by the green surfaces of the crope2
Outcome
Total D.M. productione2
Direction
strongly relatede2

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total D.M. production was also strongly related to radiation absorbed by the green surfaces of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn sowing decreased the growth efficiency (E g).

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
autumn sowinge3
Outcome
growth efficiencye3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e3

“autumn sowing and drought both decreased the constant of proportionality, i.e. the growth efficiency ( E g )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased the growth efficiency (E g).

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
droughte3
Outcome
growth efficiencye3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e3

“autumn sowing and drought both decreased the constant of proportionality, i.e. the growth efficiency ( E g )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn sowings yielded more than spring sowings.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
Autumn sowingse5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
yielded moree5
Comparator
spring sowingse5

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e5

“Autumn sowings yielded more than spring sowings because they grew for longer and received 22% more radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn sowings received 22% more radiation than spring sowings.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
Autumn sowingse5
Outcome
radiatione5
Direction
moree5
Value
22%e5
Comparator
spring sowingse5

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e5

“Autumn sowings yielded more than spring sowings because they grew for longer and received 22% more radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index was about 40% higher in autumn sowings than spring sowings.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
Autumn sowingse5
Outcome
harvest indexe6
Direction
highere6
Value
40%e6
Comparator
spring sowingse6

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e5

“Autumn sowings yielded more than spring sowings because they grew for longer and received 22% more radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–741 · show in text ↑
e6

“Their harvest index was also about 40% higher than in spring sowings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased yield mainly by decreasing radiation received and growth efficiency.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
Droughte4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
decreasede4
Qualifier
mainly by decreasing radiation received and E ge4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e4

“Drought decreased yield mainly by decreasing radiation received and E g. Growth duration was shorter and harvest index was smaller”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 865–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought growth duration was shorter and harvest index was smaller.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
Droughte4
Outcome
Growth duratione4
Direction
shortere4
Qualifier
harvest index was smallere4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e4

“Drought decreased yield mainly by decreasing radiation received and E g. Growth duration was shorter and harvest index was smaller”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 865–996 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of phenological development was strongly dependent on temperature and less on photoperiod.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
temperaturee7
Outcome
rate of phenological developmente7
Direction
strongly dependente7
Qualifier
to a lesser extent on photoperiode7

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e7

“The rate of phenological development was strongly dependent upon temperature and to a lesser extent on photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average thermal duration from emergence to flowering was 790 °Cd above a base of 0 °C.

Taxon
field beane0
Outcome
average thermal duration from emergence to floweringe1
Value
790 °Cde1
Qualifier
above a base of 0 °Ce1

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average thermal duration from emergence to flowering was 790 °Cd above a base of 0 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1203 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time from sowing to the end of pod growth was well represented by a simple multiplicative model.

Taxon
field beane0
Outcome
time from sowing to the end of the pod growthe2
Qualifier
well represented by a simple multiplicative modele2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“The time from sowing to the end of the pod growth was well represented by a simple multiplicative model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1308 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average photothermal duration required for 10 crops was 980 °Cd.

Taxon
field beane0
Outcome
photothermal duration requirede3
Value
980 °Cde3
Qualifier
for 10 cropse3

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e3

“The average photothermal duration required for 10 crops was 980 °Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1497 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final number of pods per plant was closely correlated with the rate of assimilate supply during pod filling.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
rate of supply of assimilates during pod fillinge4
Outcome
final number of pods per plante4
Direction
closely correlatede4

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e4

“The final number of pods per plant was closely correlated with the rate of supply of assimilates during pod filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased assimilate flux.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
Irrigatione5
Outcome
assimilate fluxe5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
by increasing leaf area, growth rate and total dry matter during pod growthe5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e5

“Irrigation increased assimilate flux by increasing leaf area, growth rate and total dry matter during pod growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–1929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate and duration of pod growth were little affected by irrigation.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
irrigatione6
Outcome
rate and duration of pod growthe6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e6

“Both the rate and duration of pod growth were little affected by irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–2006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn sowings produced heavier pods and beans due to a faster rate and longer duration of growth.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
Autumn sowingse7
Outcome
pods and beanse7
Direction
heaviere7
Qualifier
due to both a faster rate and a longer duration of growthe7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e7

“Autumn sowings produced heavier pods and beans due to both a faster rate and a longer duration of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2008–2112 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Seed growth depends on current assimilate and stored reserves, the latter especially under stress.

Taxon
field beane0
Outcome
Seed growthe1
Qualifier
depends on both the current assimilate and stored reservese1

Verbatim

e0

“four crops of field bean cv. Maris Bead in response to irrigation and sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed growth depends on both the current assimilate and stored reserves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2206–2276 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

65 papers: 6 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

sowing time · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 22 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

drought · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 10 positive, 95 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.