Paper · 1995 · Plant Cell & Environment

Effects of free‐air CO2 enrichment on the development of the photosynthetic apparatus in wheat, as indicated by changes in leaf proteins

G. Y NIE; S. P. LONG; R. L. GARCIA; et al.

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
145
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT A spring wheat crop was grown at ambient and elevated (550 μmol mol −1 ) CO 2 concentrations under free‐air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) in the field. Four experimental blocks, each comprising 21‐m‐diameter FACE and control experimental areas, were used. CO 2 elevation was maintained day and night from crop emergence to final grain harvest. This experiment provided a unique opportunity to examine the hypothesis that CO 2 elevation in the field would lead to acclimatory changes within the photosynthetic apparatus under open field conditions and lo assess whether acclimation was affected by crop developmental stage, leaf ontogeny and leaf age. Change in the photosynthetic apparatus was assessed by measuring changes in the composition of total leaf and thylakoid polypeptides separated by SDS‐PAGE. For leaves at completion of emergence of the blade, growth at the elevated CO 2 concentration had no apparent effect on the amount of any of the major proteins of the photosynthetic apparatus regardless of the leaf examined. Leaf 5 on the main stem was in full sunlight at emergence, but then became shaded progressively as 3–4 further leaves formed above with continued development of the crop. By 35 d following completion of blade emergence, leaf 5 was in shade. At this point, the chlorophyll alb ratio had declined by 26% both in plants grown at the control CO 2 concentration and in those grown at the elevated CO 2 concentration, which is indicative of shade acclimation. The ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) content declined by 45% in the control leaves, but by 60% in the leaves grown at the elevated CO 2 concentration. The light‐ harvesting complex of photosystcm II (LHCII) and the chlorophyll content showed no decrease and no difference between treatments, indicating that the decrease in Rubisco was not an effect of earlier senescence in the leaves at the elevated CO 2 concentration. Following completion of the emergence of the flag‐leaf blade, the elevated‐CO 2 treatment inhibited the further accumulation of Rubisco which was apparent in control leaves over the subsequent 14 d. From this point onwards, the flag leaves from both treatments showed a loss of Rubisco, which was far more pronounced in the elevated‐CO 2 treatment, so that by 36 d the Rubisco content of these leaves was just 70% of that of the controls and by 52 d it was only 20%. At 36 d, there was no decline in chlorophyll, LHCII or the chloroplast ATPase coupling factor (CFI) in the elevated CO 2 concentration treatment relative to the control. By 52 d, all of these proteins showed a significant decline relative to the control. This indicates that the decreased concentration of Rubisco at this final stage probably reflected earlier senescence in the elevated‐CO 2 treatment, but that this was preceded by a CO 2 ‐concentration‐dependent decline in Rubisco.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 had no apparent effect on major photosynthetic protein amounts at blade emergence.

Treatment
elevated CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
amount of any of the major proteins of the photosynthetic apparatuse0
Direction
no apparent effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“growth at the elevated CO 2 concentration had no apparent effect on the amount of any of the major proteins of the photosynthetic apparatus regardless of the leaf examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1032 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf 5 became shaded by 35 days after blade emergence.

Organ / stage
leaf 5e0
Outcome
leaf 5 was in shadee0
Qualifier
35 d following completion of blade emergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“By 35 d following completion of blade emergence, leaf 5 was in shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 35 days, leaf 5 chlorophyll alb ratio declined by 26% in both CO2 treatments.

Outcome
chlorophyll alb ratioe0
Direction
declinede0
Value
26%e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“the chlorophyll alb ratio had declined by 26% both in plants grown at the control CO 2 concentration and in those grown at the elevated CO 2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1444 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubisco content in control leaf 5 declined by 45%.

Gene
ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco)e0
Outcome
Rubisco) contente0
Direction
declinede0
Value
45%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“The ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) content declined by 45% in the control leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1595 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubisco content in elevated CO2 leaves declined by 60%.

Treatment
elevated CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
Rubisco) contente1
Direction
declinede1
Value
60%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“but by 60% in the leaves grown at the elevated CO 2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1662 · show in text ↑
e1

“The ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) content declined by 45% in the control leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LHCII and chlorophyll content showed no decrease or treatment difference at this point.

Outcome
light‐ harvesting complex of photosystcm II (LHCII) and the chlorophyll contente0
Direction
no differencee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“The light‐ harvesting complex of photosystcm II (LHCII) and the chlorophyll content showed no decrease and no difference between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 inhibited further Rubisco accumulation in flag leaves during the 14 days after emergence.

Treatment
elevated‐CO 2 treatmente0
Outcome
further accumulation of Rubiscoe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
subsequent 14 de0
Comparator
control leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“the elevated‐CO 2 treatment inhibited the further accumulation of Rubisco which was apparent in control leaves over the subsequent 14 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1997–2132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaves in both treatments subsequently lost Rubisco, more strongly under elevated CO2.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Treatment
elevated‐CO 2 treatmente0
Outcome
loss of Rubiscoe0
Direction
far more pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“the flag leaves from both treatments showed a loss of Rubisco, which was far more pronounced in the elevated‐CO 2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2159–2282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 36 days, elevated CO2 flag leaves had 70% of control Rubisco content.

Outcome
Rubisco contente0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
70%e0
Qualifier
36 de0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“by 36 d the Rubisco content of these leaves was just 70% of that of the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2292–2372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 52 days, elevated CO2 flag leaves had only 20% of control Rubisco content.

Outcome
Rubisco contente1
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
52 de0
Comparator
controlse1

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“by 52 d it was only 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2377–2400 · show in text ↑
e1

“by 36 d the Rubisco content of these leaves was just 70% of that of the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2292–2372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 36 days, elevated CO2 produced no decline in chlorophyll, LHCII or CFI relative to controls.

Treatment
elevated CO 2 concentration treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll, LHCII or the chloroplast ATPase coupling factor (CFI)e0
Direction
no declinee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 36 d, there was no decline in chlorophyll, LHCII or the chloroplast ATPase coupling factor (CFI) in the elevated CO 2 concentration treatment relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2402–2570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 52 days, chlorophyll, LHCII and CFI declined significantly under elevated CO2 relative to controls.

Treatment
elevated CO 2 concentration treatmente1
Outcome
chlorophyll, LHCII or the chloroplast ATPase coupling factor (CFI)e1
Direction
declinee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“By 52 d, all of these proteins showed a significant decline relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2572–2655 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll, LHCII or the chloroplast ATPase coupling factor (CFI) in the elevated CO 2 concentration treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2435–2546 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The late Rubisco decline probably reflected earlier senescence under elevated CO2.

Treatment
elevated‐CO 2 treatmente0
Outcome
decreased concentration of Rubiscoe0
Qualifier
probably reflected earlier senescencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“the decreased concentration of Rubisco at this final stage probably reflected earlier senescence in the elevated‐CO 2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2677–2804 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.