Paper · 2008 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of Defoliation Management on Water‐Soluble Carbohydrate Energy Reserves, Dry Matter Yields, and Herbage Quality of Tall Fescue

D. J. Donaghy; L. R. Turner; K. A. Adamczewski

12
claims
31
verbatim quotes
69
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

There is limited information on the effect of leaf stage based defoliation management on the regrowth of tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). The aim of this study was to investigate the physiological changes in tall fescue during its regrowth cycle up to the five‐leaf stage, and the effect of repeated defoliation at the one‐leaf, two‐leaf, and four‐leaf stages on herbage quality, water‐soluble carbohydrate (WSC) energy reserves and the rate of subsequent plant regrowth. Crude protein (CP) and metabolizable energy (ME) concentrations decreased with increased leaf regrowth stage, from 27% and 11.3 MJ kg −1 dry matter (DM) at the one‐leaf stage, to 16.1% and 9.2 MJ kg −1 DM at the five‐leaf stage, respectively. Acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations increased during the regrowth cycle by 16 and 9%, respectively. Frequent defoliation therefore maximized the CP and ME concentrations and minimized the ADF and NDF concentrations of tall fescue, but limited DM yields during regrowth. Defoliation at the four‐leaf stage resulted in 30% higher stubble WSC concentration and 20% higher leaf DM yield than defoliation at the two‐leaf stage of regrowth, but compromised herbage quality. The stubble was confirmed as the primary storage organ for WSC reserves, while leaf and root growth were found to have an equally high priority for available energy following defoliation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein concentration of tall fescue decreased as leaf regrowth stage increased, to 16.1%.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
increased leaf regrowth stagee1
Outcome
Crude protein (CP)e1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
16.1%e2
Qualifier
from 27%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crude protein (CP) and metabolizable energy (ME) concentrations decreased with increased leaf regrowth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–591 · show in text ↑
e2

“to 16.1% and 9.2 MJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–678 · show in text ↑
e3

“from 27% and 11.3 MJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–613 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolizable energy concentration of tall fescue decreased as leaf regrowth stage increased, to 9.2 MJ.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
increased leaf regrowth stagee1
Outcome
metabolizable energy (ME) concentrationse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
9.2 MJe2
Qualifier
11.3 MJe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crude protein (CP) and metabolizable energy (ME) concentrations decreased with increased leaf regrowth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–591 · show in text ↑
e2

“to 16.1% and 9.2 MJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–678 · show in text ↑
e3

“from 27% and 11.3 MJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–613 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid detergent fiber concentration of tall fescue increased by 16 during the regrowth cycle.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
regrowth cyclee4
Outcome
Acid detergent fiber (ADF)e4
Direction
increasede4
Value
16e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e4

“Acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations increased during the regrowth cycle by 16 and 9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–864 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neutral detergent fiber concentration of tall fescue increased by 9% during the regrowth cycle.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
regrowth cyclee4
Outcome
neutral detergent fiber (NDF)e4
Direction
increasede4
Value
9%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e4

“Acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations increased during the regrowth cycle by 16 and 9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent defoliation maximized the CP and ME concentrations of tall fescue.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Frequent defoliatione5
Outcome
CP and ME concentrationse5
Direction
maximizede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e5

“Frequent defoliation therefore maximized the CP and ME concentrations and minimized the ADF and NDF concentrations of tall fescue, but limited DM yields during regrowth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent defoliation minimized the ADF and NDF concentrations of tall fescue.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Frequent defoliatione5
Outcome
ADF and NDF concentrationse5
Direction
minimizede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e5

“Frequent defoliation therefore maximized the CP and ME concentrations and minimized the ADF and NDF concentrations of tall fescue, but limited DM yields during regrowth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent defoliation limited DM yields during regrowth.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Frequent defoliatione5
Outcome
DM yieldse5
Direction
limitede5
Qualifier
during regrowthe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e5

“Frequent defoliation therefore maximized the CP and ME concentrations and minimized the ADF and NDF concentrations of tall fescue, but limited DM yields during regrowth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at the four-leaf stage gave 30% higher stubble WSC concentration than at the two-leaf stage.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Organ / stage
stubblee6
Treatment
Defoliation at the four‐leaf stagee6
Outcome
stubble WSC concentratione6
Direction
highere6
Value
30%e6
Comparator
defoliation at the two‐leaf stagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e6

“Defoliation at the four‐leaf stage resulted in 30% higher stubble WSC concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1119 · show in text ↑
e7

“20% higher leaf DM yield than defoliation at the two‐leaf stage of regrowth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at the four-leaf stage gave 20% higher leaf DM yield than at the two-leaf stage.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Organ / stage
leafe7
Treatment
Defoliation at the four‐leaf stagee6
Outcome
leaf DM yielde7
Direction
highere7
Value
20%e7
Comparator
defoliation at the two‐leaf stagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e6

“Defoliation at the four‐leaf stage resulted in 30% higher stubble WSC concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1119 · show in text ↑
e7

“20% higher leaf DM yield than defoliation at the two‐leaf stage of regrowth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at the four-leaf stage compromised herbage quality.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Defoliation at the four‐leaf stagee6
Outcome
herbage qualitye7
Direction
compromisede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e6

“Defoliation at the four‐leaf stage resulted in 30% higher stubble WSC concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1119 · show in text ↑
e7

“but compromised herbage quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1232 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stubble was the primary storage organ for water-soluble carbohydrate reserves of tall fescue.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Organ / stage
stubblee7
Outcome
primary storage organ for WSC reservese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e7

“The stubble was confirmed as the primary storage organ for WSC reserves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and root growth had an equally high priority for available energy following defoliation.

Taxon
Tall FescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Organ / stage
leaf and root growthe7
Outcome
priority for available energy following defoliatione7
Direction
equally highe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“of Tall Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–133 · show in text ↑
e7

“leaf and root growth were found to have an equally high priority for available energy following defoliation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1420 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: grain · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pruning · quality: general · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

pruning · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

pruning · quality: protein · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.