Paper · 1999 · Israel Journal of Plant Sciences

LIGHT-STIMULATED LEAF GROWTH ON INTACT AND EXCISED BEAN PLANTS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.) III. EFFECT OF LIGHT INTENSITY

Shimon Lavee; Elizabeth Van Volkenburgh; Robert Cleland E.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of light intensity on primary bean leaf unfolding and elongation was studied with intact and excised 10-day-old plants grown under red light. Continuous light of 40 μmol; m −2 S −1 was enough to induce maximal leaf expansion both on intact and excised bean plants. Lower light intensities had a partial effect. The growth rate during the first 24 h in light was linearly related to light intensity up to 130 μmol; m −2 S −1 , although this light intensity was already supra-optimal for final leaf size. The minimal amount of light energy needed for full leaf expansion was about 15 mol photons m −2 . The mode of light application, level of intensity, and irradiance duration were not critical when the total energy requirement was fulfilled. Under insufficient light applications for full leaf expansion, interrupted irradiance and longer low light intensity application induced leaf elongation more efficiently. Generally, the effect of different white light intensities on primary bean leaf expansion was the same on both intact and excised red-light-grown plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light at 40 μmol; m −2 S −1 induced maximal expansion on intact and excised plants.

Taxon
bean plantse0
Treatment
Continuous light of 40 μmol; m −2 S −1e0
Outcome
leaf expansione0
Direction
maximale0
Value
40 μmol; m −2 S −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous light of 40 μmol; m −2 S −1 was enough to induce maximal leaf expansion both on intact and excised bean plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light intensities had only a partial effect on leaf expansion.

Taxon
BEAN PLANTSt0
Treatment
Lower light intensitiese0
Outcome
partial effecte0
Direction
partial effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Lower light intensities had a partial effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–321 · show in text ↑
t0

“BEAN PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth rate over the first 24 hours rose linearly with light intensity up to 130 μmol; m −2 S −1.

Taxon
BEAN PLANTSt0
Treatment
light intensitye0
Outcome
growth ratee0
Value
130 μmol; m −2 S −1e0
Qualifier
first 24 h in lighte0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The growth rate during the first 24 h in light was linearly related to light intensity up to 130 μmol; m −2 S −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“BEAN PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An intensity of 130 μmol; m −2 S −1 was supra optimal for final leaf size.

Taxon
BEAN PLANTSt0
Outcome
final leaf sizee0
Direction
supra-optimale0

Verbatim

e0

“this light intensity was already supra-optimal for final leaf size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“BEAN PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full leaf expansion required about 15 mol photons m −2.

Taxon
BEAN PLANTSt0
Outcome
full leaf expansione0
Value
about 15 mol photons m −2e0

Verbatim

e0

“The minimal amount of light energy needed for full leaf expansion was about 15 mol photons m −2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“BEAN PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light application mode, intensity and duration were not critical after the energy requirement was met.

Taxon
BEAN PLANTSt0
Outcome
not criticale0
Qualifier
when the total energy requirement was fulfillede0

Verbatim

e0

“The mode of light application, level of intensity, and irradiance duration were not critical when the total energy requirement was fulfilled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“BEAN PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With insufficient total light, interrupted irradiance increased leaf elongation efficiency.

Taxon
BEAN PLANTSt0
Treatment
interrupted irradiancee0
Outcome
leaf elongatione0
Direction
more efficientlye0
Qualifier
Under insufficient light applications for full leaf expansione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under insufficient light applications for full leaf expansion, interrupted irradiance and longer low light intensity application induced leaf elongation more efficiently.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“BEAN PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With insufficient total light, longer low intensity application increased leaf elongation efficiency.

Taxon
BEAN PLANTSt0
Treatment
longer low light intensity applicatione0
Outcome
leaf elongatione0
Direction
more efficientlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under insufficient light applications for full leaf expansion, interrupted irradiance and longer low light intensity application induced leaf elongation more efficiently.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“BEAN PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White light intensities affected primary leaf expansion similarly in intact and excised red light grown bean plants.

Taxon
beane0
Outcome
primary bean leaf expansione0
Comparator
intact and excised red-light-grown plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Generally, the effect of different white light intensities on primary bean leaf expansion was the same on both intact and excised red-light-grown plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1078 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 29 positive, 12 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.