Paper · 2004 · Crop Science

Evaluation of Drought Resistance for Texas Bluegrass, Kentucky Bluegrass, and Their Hybrids

Eleni M. Abraham; Bingru Huang; Stacy A. Bonos; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
96
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.; KBG) has good turf quality with adequate irrigation, but moderate to low drought resistance. Interspecific hybridization of Kentucky bluegrass with Texas bluegrass ( Poa arachnifera Torr.; TBG), a drought resistant grass native to Texas, has been made to transfer genes of drought resistance from TBG to KBG. The objectives of this study were (i) to investigate whether the hybrids have improved drought resistance compared with either TBG or KBG by examining physiological responses to drought stress; and (ii) to determine major physiological factors associated with recuperative ability of those plants from drought stress. Plants were exposed to drought stress by withholding irrigation for 42 d in a greenhouse. The experiment consisted of 29 fourth‐generation backcrossed hybrids, one third‐generation hybrid (BDF), two KBG parents (‘C‐74’, ‘Midnight’), and one TBG parent. The genotypes classified into three cluster groups of drought resistance (high, moderate, and low) based on the responses of relative water content (RWC), electrolyte leakage (EL), and photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) to drought stress. The RWC and Fv/Fm declined with drought stress, but were maintained at higher levels in the high resistance group than the other group, while EL increased during drought and was lower in the high resistance group. Texas bluegrass, Midnight KBG, and two hybrids were ranked highest in drought resistance. Other hybrids varied in drought resistance, with more hybrids of BDF × Midnight ranked in the high drought resistance group than the hybrids of BDF × C‐74. Among all physiological parameters examined, EL was the most sensitive indicator to drought stress, as demonstrated by its most rapid increase in response to the stress. High Fv/Fm and retaining of green leaves during drought stress contributed to fast recovery from drought stress following rewatering.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes grouped into high, moderate and low drought-resistance classes by RWC, EL and Fv/Fm

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise0
Outcome
drought resistancee1
Qualifier
three cluster groups of drought resistance (high, moderate, and low)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.; KBG) has good turf quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“The genotypes classified into three cluster groups of drought resistance (high, moderate, and low) based on the responses of relative water content (RWC), electrolyte leakage (EL), and photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced RWC and Fv/Fm of Kentucky bluegrass genotypes

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
RWC and Fv/Fme2
Direction
declinede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.; KBG) has good turf quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“The RWC and Fv/Fm declined with drought stress, but were maintained at higher levels in the high resistance group than the other group, while EL increased during drought and was lower in the high resistance group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1368 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RWC and Fv/Fm were higher in the high drought-resistance group than in the other groups

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise0
Outcome
RWC and Fv/Fme2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
high resistance groupe2
Comparator
the other groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.; KBG) has good turf quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“The RWC and Fv/Fm declined with drought stress, but were maintained at higher levels in the high resistance group than the other group, while EL increased during drought and was lower in the high resistance group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased electrolyte leakage in Kentucky bluegrass genotypes

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise0
Treatment
droughte2
Outcome
ELe2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.; KBG) has good turf quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“The RWC and Fv/Fm declined with drought stress, but were maintained at higher levels in the high resistance group than the other group, while EL increased during drought and was lower in the high resistance group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1368 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrolyte leakage was lower in the high drought-resistance group under drought

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise0
Treatment
droughte2
Outcome
ELe2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
high resistance groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.; KBG) has good turf quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“The RWC and Fv/Fm declined with drought stress, but were maintained at higher levels in the high resistance group than the other group, while EL increased during drought and was lower in the high resistance group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1368 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrolyte leakage was the most sensitive indicator of drought stress among the parameters examined

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise0
Outcome
ELe5
Qualifier
the most sensitive indicator to drought stresse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.; KBG) has good turf quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“EL was the most sensitive indicator to drought stress, as demonstrated by its most rapid increase in response to the stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1784 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Texas bluegrass, Midnight KBG and two hybrids ranked highest in drought resistance

Taxon
Texas bluegrassPoa arachniferae3
Outcome
drought resistancee3
Qualifier
ranked higheste3

Verbatim

e3

“Texas bluegrass, Midnight KBG, and two hybrids were ranked highest in drought resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1458 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More BDF x Midnight hybrids than BDF x C-74 hybrids fell in the high drought-resistance group

Taxon
hybrids of BDF × Midnighte4
Outcome
high drought resistance groupe4
Direction
moree4
Comparator
the hybrids of BDF × C‐74e4

Verbatim

e4

“more hybrids of BDF × Midnight ranked in the high drought resistance group than the hybrids of BDF × C‐74”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1614 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High Fv/Fm and green leaf retention may contribute to fast recovery of Kentucky bluegrass from drought after rewatering

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise0
Outcome
fast recovery from drought stresse6
Qualifier
High Fv/Fm and retaining of green leaves during drought stresse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.; KBG) has good turf quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e6

“High Fv/Fm and retaining of green leaves during drought stress contributed to fast recovery from drought stress following rewatering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1918 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.