Paper · 2001 · Crop Science

Osmotic Adjustment and Root Growth Associated with Drought Preconditioning‐Enhanced Heat Tolerance in Kentucky Bluegrass

Yiwei Jiang; Bingru Huang

17
claims
42
verbatim quotes
110
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Prior exposure to drought stress (drought preconditioning) affects turfgrass tolerance to subsequent heat stress. The study was designed to examine whether these effects for Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.) are associated with osmotic adjustment and root growth. Plants were subjected to two cycles of drying and rewatering, and turf quality was then allowed to recover to the well watered control level before being exposed to 21 d of heat stress (35°C/30°C) in growth chambers. Compared with nonpreconditioned plants, drought‐preconditioned plants had 13 and 21% higher turf quality, 6 and 10% higher leaf relative water content, and 17 and 48% higher osmotic adjustment at 14 and 21 d of heat stress, respectively. Total ion (K + , Ca 2+ , Na + , Ma 2+ , Cl − , and P) concentration of cell sap increased during heat stress and was 11 to 16% higher in drought‐preconditioned plants than nonpreconditioned plants. The concentration of K + accounted for 59 to 65% of total ion solutes in both groups of plants during heat stress. Soluble carbohydrate content (WSC) of leaves increased during heat stress and was about 21 and 44% higher in drought‐preconditioned plants than nonpreconditioned plants at 14 and 21 d, respectively. Heat stress decreased root dry weight (DW) and WSC, but significant higher DW and WSC content of roots in the 40–60 cm soil layer were observed for preconditioned plants than nonpreconditioned plants before and after heat stress. The results demonstrated that drought preconditioning enhanced heat tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass, which could be related to the maintenance of higher osmotic adjustment associated with accumulation of ion solutes and water soluble carbohydrates and development of extensive roots deeper in the soil profile.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought preconditioning gave 13% higher turf quality at day 14 of heat stress.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought‐preconditionede0
Outcome
turf qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
13e0
Qualifier
14e1
Comparator
nonpreconditioned plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with nonpreconditioned plants, drought‐preconditioned plants had 13 and 21% higher turf quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–590 · show in text ↑
e1

“at 14 and 21 d of heat stress, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought preconditioning gave 21% higher turf quality at day 21 of heat stress.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought‐preconditionede0
Outcome
turf qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
21%e0
Qualifier
21 d of heat stresse1
Comparator
nonpreconditioned plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with nonpreconditioned plants, drought‐preconditioned plants had 13 and 21% higher turf quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–590 · show in text ↑
e1

“at 14 and 21 d of heat stress, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought preconditioning gave 6% higher leaf relative water content at day 14.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought‐preconditionede1
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
6e0
Qualifier
14e1
Comparator
nonpreconditioned plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6 and 10% higher leaf relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with nonpreconditioned plants, drought‐preconditioned plants had 13 and 21% higher turf quality, 6 and 10% higher leaf relative water content, and 17 and 48% higher osmotic adjustment at 14 and 21 d of heat stress, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought preconditioning gave 10% higher leaf relative water content at day 21.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought‐preconditionede1
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
21 d of heat stresse1
Comparator
nonpreconditioned plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6 and 10% higher leaf relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with nonpreconditioned plants, drought‐preconditioned plants had 13 and 21% higher turf quality, 6 and 10% higher leaf relative water content, and 17 and 48% higher osmotic adjustment at 14 and 21 d of heat stress, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought preconditioning gave 17% higher osmotic adjustment at day 14.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought‐preconditionede1
Outcome
osmotic adjustmente0
Direction
highere0
Value
17e0
Qualifier
14e0
Comparator
nonpreconditioned plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“17 and 48% higher osmotic adjustment at 14 and 21 d of heat stress, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with nonpreconditioned plants, drought‐preconditioned plants had”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought preconditioning gave 48% higher osmotic adjustment at day 21.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought‐preconditionede1
Outcome
osmotic adjustmente0
Direction
highere0
Value
48%e0
Qualifier
21 d of heat stresse0
Comparator
nonpreconditioned plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“17 and 48% higher osmotic adjustment at 14 and 21 d of heat stress, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with nonpreconditioned plants, drought‐preconditioned plants had”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell sap total ion concentration increased during heat stress.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Outcome
Total ion (K + , Ca 2+ , Na + , Ma 2+ , Cl − , and P) concentration of cell sape0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total ion (K + , Ca 2+ , Na + , Ma 2+ , Cl − , and P) concentration of cell sap increased during heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preconditioned plants had 11 to 16% higher cell sap ion concentration during heat stress.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought‐preconditioned plantse0
Outcome
Total ion (K + , Ca 2+ , Na + , Ma 2+ , Cl − , and P) concentration of cell sape1
Direction
highere0
Value
11 to 16%e0
Comparator
nonpreconditioned plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was 11 to 16% higher in drought‐preconditioned plants than nonpreconditioned plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total ion (K + , Ca 2+ , Na + , Ma 2+ , Cl − , and P) concentration of cell sap increased during heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium comprised 59 to 65% of ion solutes in both plant groups during heat stress.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Outcome
concentration of K +e0
Value
59 to 65%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of K + accounted for 59 to 65% of total ion solutes in both groups of plants during heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf soluble carbohydrate content increased during heat stress.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
Soluble carbohydrate content (WSC)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble carbohydrate content (WSC) of leaves increased during heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preconditioned plants had about 21% more leaf soluble carbohydrates at day 14.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought‐preconditioned plantse0
Outcome
Soluble carbohydrate content (WSC)e1
Direction
highere0
Value
21e0
Qualifier
14e0
Comparator
nonpreconditioned plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was about 21 and 44% higher in drought‐preconditioned plants than nonpreconditioned plants at 14 and 21 d, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soluble carbohydrate content (WSC) of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preconditioned plants had about 44% more leaf soluble carbohydrates at day 21.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
drought‐preconditioned plantse0
Outcome
Soluble carbohydrate content (WSC)e1
Direction
highere0
Value
44%e0
Qualifier
21 de0
Comparator
nonpreconditioned plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was about 21 and 44% higher in drought‐preconditioned plants than nonpreconditioned plants at 14 and 21 d, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soluble carbohydrate content (WSC) of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress decreased root dry weight.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
Heat stresse0
Outcome
root dry weight (DW)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat stress decreased root dry weight (DW) and WSC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress decreased root soluble carbohydrate content.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
Heat stresse0
Outcome
WSCe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat stress decreased root dry weight (DW) and WSC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preconditioning maintained significantly higher root dry weight at 40–60 cm before and after heat stress.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
preconditioned plantse0
Outcome
DWe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nonpreconditioned plantse0
Setting
40–60 cm soil layere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant higher DW and WSC content of roots in the 40–60 cm soil layer were observed for preconditioned plants than nonpreconditioned plants before and after heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preconditioning maintained significantly higher root soluble carbohydrate content at 40–60 cm before and after heat stress.

Taxon
Kentucky BluegrassPoa pratensist0
Treatment
preconditioned plantse0
Outcome
WSC content of rootse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nonpreconditioned plantse0
Setting
40–60 cm soil layere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant higher DW and WSC content of roots in the 40–60 cm soil layer were observed for preconditioned plants than nonpreconditioned plants before and after heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kentucky Bluegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded drought preconditioning enhanced heat tolerance, possibly through osmotic adjustment, solute accumulation and deeper roots.

Taxon
Kentucky bluegrassPoa pratensise0
Treatment
drought preconditioninge0
Outcome
heat tolerancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
could be related to the maintenance of higher osmotic adjustment associated with accumulation of ion solutes and water soluble carbohydrates and development of extensive roots deeper in the soil profilee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa pratensis
Poa pratensis · TaxonRasbak 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought preconditioning enhanced heat tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass, which could be related to the maintenance of higher osmotic adjustment associated with accumulation of ion solutes and water soluble carbohydrates and development of extensive roots deeper in the soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1775 · show in text ↑

drought · molecular: metabolites · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · quality: general · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

heat · growth · Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.