Paper · 2015 · Scientia Agricola

Tillage, fertilization systems and chemical attributes of a Paleudult

Evelyn Penedo Dorneles; Bruno Brito Lisboa; André Dabdab Abichequer; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tillage and fertilization methods may affect soil fertility. With the aim of assessing changes in soil chemical properties over a period of ten years, soil samples of a Paleudult were collected over nine seasons at three layer depths (0-5, 5-10, 10-20 cm) and were chemically analyzed. Grain yield and nutrient export in two summer crops, soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays), in a field experiment set in Eldorado do Sul, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were determined. Three soil tillage systems were evaluated, conventional (CT), reduced (RT) and no-tillage (NT), combined with mineral (lime and fertilizers) and organic (poultry litter) fertilization. The no-tillage system stood out as compared to the others, especially in the surface layer, in terms of values of organic matter, soil pH, available phosphorus, cation exchange capacity and base saturation. Phosphorus content was higher under organic than mineral fertilization due to the criteria used for the establishment of fertilizer doses. Under organic fertilization, soil pH values were similar to those obtained in limed soil samples because of the cumulative effect of the organic fertilizer. Soybean yield was lower under NT in comparison to the RT and CT systems. Consequently, soybean grain exported a lower content of nutrients than maize grain. Maize yield was not affected by either tillage or fertilization systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased surface soil chemical fertility measures relative to other tillage systems.

Taxon
soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays)Glycine maxZea mayst0
Treatment
no-tillage systeme0
Outcome
organic matter, soil pH, available phosphorus, cation exchange capacity and base saturatione0
Direction
stood oute0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The no-tillage system stood out as compared to the others, especially in the surface layer, in terms of values of organic matter, soil pH, available phosphorus, cation exchange capacity and base saturation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization produced higher soil phosphorus than mineral fertilization.

Taxon
soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays)Glycine maxZea mayst0
Treatment
organice0
Outcome
Phosphorus contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mineral fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus content was higher under organic than mineral fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH under organic fertilization was similar to limed soil.

Taxon
soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays)Glycine maxZea mayst0
Treatment
organic fertilizatione0
Outcome
soil pH valuese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
limed soil samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under organic fertilization, soil pH values were similar to those obtained in limed soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield was lower under no-tillage than reduced or conventional tillage.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
Soybean yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
RT and CT systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean yield was lower under NT in comparison to the RT and CT systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1248 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean grain exported less nutrients than maize grain.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
soybean grain exported a lower content of nutrientse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
maize graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean grain exported a lower content of nutrients than maize grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield was unaffected by tillage or fertilization systems.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
tillage or fertilization systemse0
Outcome
Maize yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize yield was not affected by either tillage or fertilization systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1405 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.