Paper · 2015 · Plant Pathology

Biological control of sclerotinia stem rot of canola using antagonistic bacteria

M. M. Kamal; K. D. Lindbeck; S. Savocchia; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
45
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide. In Australia the management of stem rot relies primarily on strategic application of synthetic fungicides. In an attempt to find alternative strategies for the management of the disease, 514 naturally occurring bacterial isolates were screened for antagonism to S. sclerotiorum . Antifungal activity against mycelial growth of the fungus was exhibited by three isolates of bacteria. The bacteria were identified as Bacillus cereus (SC‐1 and P‐1) and Bacillus subtilis (W‐67) via 16S rRNA sequencing. In vitro antagonism assays using these isolates resulted in significant inhibition of mycelial elongation and complete inhibition of sclerotial germination by both non‐volatile and volatile metabolites. The antagonistic strains caused a significant reduction in the viability of sclerotia when tested in a greenhouse pot trial with soil collected from the field. Spray treatments of bacterial strains reduced disease incidence and yielded higher control efficacy both on inoculated cotyledons and stems. Application of SC‐1 and W‐67 in the field at 10% flowering stage (growth stage 4·00) of canola demonstrated that control efficacy of SC‐1 was significantly higher in all three trials (over 2 years) when sprayed twice at 7‐day intervals. The greatest control of disease was observed with the fungicide Prosaro ® 420SC or with two applications of SC‐1. The results demonstrated that, in the light of environmental concerns and increasing cost of fungicides, B. cereus SC ‐1 may have potential as a biological control agent of sclerotinia stem rot of canola in Australia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three bacterial isolates showed antifungal activity against mycelial growth of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.

Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
Antifungal activity against mycelial growth of the funguse1
Qualifier
three isolates of bacteriae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Antifungal activity against mycelial growth of the fungus was exhibited by three isolates of bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-volatile and volatile metabolites of the antagonistic bacteria significantly inhibited mycelial elongation of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.

Treatment
non‐volatile and volatile metabolitese2
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial elongatione2
Direction
inhibitione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“In vitro antagonism assays using these isolates resulted in significant inhibition of mycelial elongation and complete inhibition of sclerotial germination by both non‐volatile and volatile metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-volatile and volatile metabolites of the antagonistic bacteria completely inhibited sclerotial germination.

Treatment
non‐volatile and volatile metabolitese2
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
sclerotial germinatione2
Direction
complete inhibitione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“In vitro antagonism assays using these isolates resulted in significant inhibition of mycelial elongation and complete inhibition of sclerotial germination by both non‐volatile and volatile metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonistic strains significantly reduced the viability of sclerotia in a greenhouse pot trial with field soil.

Treatment
antagonistic strainse3
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
viability of sclerotiae3
Direction
reductione3
Setting
greenhouse pot triale3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“The antagonistic strains caused a significant reduction in the viability of sclerotia when tested in a greenhouse pot trial with soil collected from the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray treatments of bacterial strains reduced canola disease incidence on inoculated cotyledons and stems.

Organ / stage
cotyledons and stemse4
Treatment
Spray treatments of bacterial strainse4
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spray treatments of bacterial strains reduced disease incidence and yielded higher control efficacy both on inoculated cotyledons and stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray treatments of bacterial strains gave higher control efficacy on inoculated cotyledons and stems.

Organ / stage
cotyledons and stemse4
Treatment
Spray treatments of bacterial strainse4
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
control efficacye4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spray treatments of bacterial strains reduced disease incidence and yielded higher control efficacy both on inoculated cotyledons and stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying SC‐1 twice at 7-day intervals gave higher control efficacy than W‐67 in all three field trials over 2 years.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee5
Treatment
sprayed twice at 7‐day intervalse5
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Second interactor
SC‐1e5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control efficacye5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
in all three trials (over 2 years)e5
Setting
in the fielde5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of SC‐1 and W‐67 in the field at 10% flowering stage (growth stage 4·00) of canola demonstrated that control efficacy of SC‐1 was significantly higher in all three trials (over 2 years) when sprayed twice at 7‐day intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide Prosaro 420SC gave the greatest control of stem rot disease on canola.

Treatment
fungicide Prosaro ® 420SCe6
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
control of diseasee6
Direction
greateste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e6

“The greatest control of disease was observed with the fungicide Prosaro ® 420SC or with two applications of SC‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two applications of SC‐1 gave the greatest control of stem rot disease on canola.

Treatment
two applications of SC‐1e6
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Second interactor
SC‐1e6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control of diseasee6
Direction
greateste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e6

“The greatest control of disease was observed with the fungicide Prosaro ® 420SC or with two applications of SC‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1444 · show in text ↑

metabolite · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fungicide · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.