Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spray treatments of bacterial strains gave higher control efficacy on inoculated cotyledons and stems.

A claim from Biological control of sclerotinia stem rot of canola using antagonistic bacteria · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray treatments of bacterial strains gave higher control efficacy on inoculated cotyledons and stems.

Organ / stage
cotyledons and stemse4
Treatment
Spray treatments of bacterial strainse4
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
control efficacye4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89
e4

“Spray treatments of bacterial strains reduced disease incidence and yielded higher control efficacy both on inoculated cotyledons and stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1093

Title

Biological control of sclerotinia stem rot of canola using antagonistic bacteria

M. M. Kamal; K. D. Lindbeck; S. Savocchia; et al. Plant Pathology 2015. doi:10.1111/ppa.12369

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-dbcbcf28fd937d8dff617c443dbdddb71e8e86d697d5f4471a51da3659fd90af · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

inoculation · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.