Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spraying SC‐1 twice at 7-day intervals gave higher control efficacy than W‐67 in all three field trials over 2 years.

A claim from Biological control of sclerotinia stem rot of canola using antagonistic bacteria · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying SC‐1 twice at 7-day intervals gave higher control efficacy than W‐67 in all three field trials over 2 years.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee5
Treatment
sprayed twice at 7‐day intervalse5
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Second interactor
SC‐1e5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control efficacye5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
in all three trials (over 2 years)e5
Setting
in the fielde5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a major fungal disease of canola worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89
e5

“Application of SC‐1 and W‐67 in the field at 10% flowering stage (growth stage 4·00) of canola demonstrated that control efficacy of SC‐1 was significantly higher in all three trials (over 2 years) when sprayed twice at 7‐day intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1330

Title

Biological control of sclerotinia stem rot of canola using antagonistic bacteria

M. M. Kamal; K. D. Lindbeck; S. Savocchia; et al. Plant Pathology 2015. doi:10.1111/ppa.12369

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-a3e1c02b8a8166d50d25b9ddaabd1499fc9d0af97fbd5f6cb944eb1f32fccd16 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

application · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.