Paper · 2007 · Acta Botanica Brasilica

The effect of different soil properties on arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of peanuts, sorghum and maize

Rosilaine Carrenho; Sandra Farto Botelho Trufem; Vera Lúcia Ramos Bononi; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
114
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are important for plant growth since they increase mineral influx. However, symbiosis efficiency is affected by many environmental factors. This study evaluated the effects of different treatments (+/- phosphorus; +/- liming; +/- organic matter; field, sandy or clayey soil textures) on root colonization (RC) of peanuts, sorghum and maize. The combination of these resulted in seventy-two treatments. The 2×2×2×3×3 factorial experiment was laid out in a randomized design. All data were subjected to variance analysis and the means were compared (Tukey at P<0.05). Three months after seed germination, roots were collected to evaluate the percentage of RC. Results showed that soil texture and liming were the most important factors influencing colonization percentage in maize, sorghum and peanuts by AMF. Significant differences were also observed between the phytobionts. Organic matter (OM) had very little influence and phosphorus addition had no effect on RC.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil texture and liming were the most important influences on AMF colonization percentage in maize, sorghum and peanuts.

Taxon
maize, sorghum and peanutsArachis hypogaeaSorghumZea mayse0
Treatment
soil texture and liminge0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
colonization percentagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that soil texture and liming were the most important factors influencing colonization percentage in maize, sorghum and peanuts by AMF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–842 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal root colonization differed significantly among the crop phytobionts.

Taxon
peanuts, sorghum and maizeArachis hypogaeaSorghumZea mayse1
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie2symbiont
Outcome
root colonization (RC)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were also observed between the phytobionts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–910 · show in text ↑
e1

“root colonization (RC) of peanuts, sorghum and maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–375 · show in text ↑
e2

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic matter had very little influence on AMF root colonization.

Taxon
peanuts, sorghum and maizeArachis hypogaeaSorghumZea mayse1
Treatment
Organic matter (OM)e0
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie2symbiont
Outcome
RCe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic matter (OM) had very little influence and phosphorus addition had no effect on RC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“root colonization (RC) of peanuts, sorghum and maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–375 · show in text ↑
e2

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus addition had no effect on AMF root colonization.

Taxon
peanuts, sorghum and maizeArachis hypogaeaSorghumZea mayse1
Treatment
phosphorus additione0
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie2symbiont
Outcome
RCe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phosphorus addition had no effect on RC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“root colonization (RC) of peanuts, sorghum and maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–375 · show in text ↑
e2

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · disease · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 13 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.