Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Seed Biopriming with Microbial Inoculant Triggers Local and Systemic Defense Responses against Rhizoctonia solani Causing Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight in Maize (Zea mays L.)

Shailendra Singh; Udai B. Singh; Deepti Malviya; et al.

13
claims
53
verbatim quotes
72
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain MF-30 isolated from maize rhizosphere was characterized for several plant growth stimulating attributes. The strain MF-30 was also evaluated for antifungal properties against Rhizoctonia solani causing banded leaf and sheath blight in maize (Zea mays L.) under in vitro conditions and was found to have higher mycelial growth suppression in the culture suspension (67.41%) followed by volatile organic compounds (62.66%) and crude extract (51.20%) in a dual plate assay. The endophytic and epiphytic colonization ability was tested using Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)-tagging. Visualization through confocal scanning laser microscope clearly indicated that strain MF-30 colonizes the root and foliar parts of the plants. Further, the effects of seed bio-priming with P. aeruginosa MF-30 was evaluated in the induction and bioaccumulation of defense-related biomolecules, enzymes, natural antioxidants, and other changes in maize under pot trial. This not only provided protection from R. solani but also ensured growth promotion under pathogenic stress conditions in maize. The maximum concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was reported in the root and shoot of the plants treated with R. solani alone (8.47 and 17.50 mmol mg−1 protein, respectively) compared to bioagent, P. aeruginosa MF-30 bio-primed plants (3.49 and 7.50 mmol mg−1 protein, respectively). Effects on total soluble sugar content, total protein, and total proline were also found to enhanced significantly due to inoculation of P. aeruginosa MF-30. The activities of anti-oxidative defense enzymes phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase increased significantly in the plants bio-primed with P. aeruginosa MF-30 and subsequent foliar spray of culture suspension of MF-30 compared to pathogen alone inoculated plants. qRT-PCR analysis revealed that seed bio-priming and foliar application of P. aeruginosa MF-30 significantly increased the expression of PR-1 and PR-10 genes with the simultaneous decrease in the disease severity and lesion length in the maize plants under pathogenic stress conditions. A significant enhancement of shoot and root biomass was recorded in MF-30 bio-primed plants as compared to untreated control (p < 0.05). Significant increase in plant growth and antioxidant content, as well as decreased disease severity in the P. aeruginosa MF-30 bio-primed plants, suggested the possibility of an eco-friendly and economical means of achieving antioxidants-rich, healthier maize plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MF-30 culture suspension suppressed Rhizoctonia mycelial growth by 67.41%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growth suppressione0
Value
67.41%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher mycelial growth suppression in the culture suspension (67.41%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–439 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher mycelial growth suppression in the culture suspension (67.41%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani Causing Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–160 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rhizoctonia solani Causing Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MF-30 volatile compounds suppressed Rhizoctonia mycelial growth by 62.66%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growth suppressione2
Value
62.66%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“volatile organic compounds (62.66%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–487 · show in text ↑
e1

“volatile organic compounds (62.66%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani Causing Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–160 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rhizoctonia solani Causing Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–160 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher mycelial growth suppression in the culture suspension (67.41%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–439 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MF-30 crude extract suppressed Rhizoctonia mycelial growth by 51.20%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growth suppressione2
Value
51.20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crude extract (51.20%) in a dual plate assay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–536 · show in text ↑
e1

“crude extract (51.20%) in a dual plate assay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani Causing Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–160 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rhizoctonia solani Causing Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–160 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher mycelial growth suppression in the culture suspension (67.41%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–439 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MF-30 colonized maize roots and foliage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
MF-30e0symbiont
Outcome
colonizes the root and foliar parts of the plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strain MF-30 colonizes the root and foliar parts of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–788 · show in text ↑
e1

“strain MF-30 colonizes the root and foliar parts of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
t1

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MF-30 biopriming protected maize from Rhizoctonia.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
seed bio-priming with P. aeruginosa MF-30e2
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
P. aeruginosa MF-30Pseudomonas aeruginosae2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
protection from R. solanie0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa · Second interactorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This not only provided protection from R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“This not only provided protection from R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
t1

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of seed bio-priming with P. aeruginosa MF-30 was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MF-30 biopriming promoted maize growth under pathogen stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
seed bio-priming with P. aeruginosa MF-30e2
Interactor
P. aeruginosa MF-30Pseudomonas aeruginosae2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
promotione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa · InteractorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ensured growth promotion under pathogenic stress conditions in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1141 · show in text ↑
e1

“ensured growth promotion under pathogenic stress conditions in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1141 · show in text ↑
e2

“effects of seed bio-priming with P. aeruginosa MF-30 was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen alone gave maximum root hydrogen peroxide at 8.47 mmol mg−1 protein, versus 3.49 with MF-30.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
R. solani alonee0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.47e0
Comparator
P. aeruginosa MF-30 bio-primed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was reported in the root and shoot of the plants treated with R. solani alone (8.47 and 17.50 mmol mg−1 protein, respectively) compared to bioagent, P. aeruginosa MF-30 bio-primed plants (3.49 and 7.50 mmol mg−1 protein, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1431 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was reported in the root and shoot of the plants treated with R. solani alone (8.47 and 17.50 mmol mg−1 protein, respectively) compared to bioagent, P. aeruginosa MF-30 bio-primed plants (3.49 and 7.50 mmol mg−1 protein, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
t1

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen alone gave maximum shoot hydrogen peroxide at 17.50 mmol mg−1 protein, versus 7.50 with MF-30.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
R. solani alonee0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
17.50 mmol mg−1 proteine0
Comparator
P. aeruginosa MF-30 bio-primed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was reported in the root and shoot of the plants treated with R. solani alone (8.47 and 17.50 mmol mg−1 protein, respectively) compared to bioagent, P. aeruginosa MF-30 bio-primed plants (3.49 and 7.50 mmol mg−1 protein, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1431 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was reported in the root and shoot of the plants treated with R. solani alone (8.47 and 17.50 mmol mg−1 protein, respectively) compared to bioagent, P. aeruginosa MF-30 bio-primed plants (3.49 and 7.50 mmol mg−1 protein, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
t1

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MF-30 inoculation significantly enhanced soluble sugar, protein, and proline.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inoculation of P. aeruginosa MF-30e0
Interactor
P. aeruginosa MF-30Pseudomonas aeruginosae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
total soluble sugar content, total protein, and total prolinee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa · InteractorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total soluble sugar content, total protein, and total proline were also found to enhanced significantly due to inoculation of P. aeruginosa MF-30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1589 · show in text ↑
e1

“total soluble sugar content, total protein, and total proline were also found to enhanced significantly due to inoculation of P. aeruginosa MF-30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
t1

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MF-30 biopriming and spray significantly increased five defense enzyme activities relative to pathogen alone.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
bio-primed with P. aeruginosa MF-30 and subsequent foliar spray of culture suspension of MF-30e0
Interactor
P. aeruginosa MF-30Pseudomonas aeruginosae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
activities of anti-oxidative defense enzymese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
pathogen alone inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa · InteractorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activities of anti-oxidative defense enzymes phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase increased significantly in the plants bio-primed with P. aeruginosa MF-30 and subsequent foliar spray of culture suspension of MF-30 compared to pathogen alone inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1921 · show in text ↑
e1

“activities of anti-oxidative defense enzymes phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase increased significantly in the plants bio-primed with P. aeruginosa MF-30 and subsequent foliar spray of culture suspension of MF-30 compared to pathogen alone inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
t1

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MF-30 application significantly increased PR-1 and PR-10 expression.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
seed bio-priming and foliar application of P. aeruginosa MF-30e0
Interactor
P. aeruginosa MF-30Pseudomonas aeruginosae0biocontrol_agent
Gene
PR-1 and PR-10 genese0
Outcome
expression of PR-1 and PR-10 genese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa · InteractorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed bio-priming and foliar application of P. aeruginosa MF-30 significantly increased the expression of PR-1 and PR-10 genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1954–2079 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed bio-priming and foliar application of P. aeruginosa MF-30 significantly increased the expression of PR-1 and PR-10 genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1954–2079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
t1

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MF-30 treatment decreased maize disease severity and lesion length under pathogen stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
seed bio-priming and foliar application of P. aeruginosa MF-30e2
Outcome
disease severity and lesion lengthe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simultaneous decrease in the disease severity and lesion length in the maize plants under pathogenic stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2089–2207 · show in text ↑
e1

“simultaneous decrease in the disease severity and lesion length in the maize plants under pathogenic stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2089–2207 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed bio-priming and foliar application of P. aeruginosa MF-30 significantly increased the expression of PR-1 and PR-10 genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1954–2079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MF-30 biopriming significantly increased shoot and root biomass relative to untreated controls.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
MF-30 bio-primed plantse0
Interactor
MF-30e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot and root biomasse0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant enhancement of shoot and root biomass was recorded in MF-30 bio-primed plants as compared to untreated control (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2209–2344 · show in text ↑
e1

“A significant enhancement of shoot and root biomass was recorded in MF-30 bio-primed plants as compared to untreated control (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2209–2344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑
t1

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas aeruginosa · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 13 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.