Paper · 1981 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Influence of water regime on growth, yield, and nitrogen uptake of rice

K.L. Sahrawat

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Greenhouse and field experiments were conducted to study the effects of water regime on growth of rice. The greenhouse experiment investigated the effects of two water regimes‐continuous flooding and flooding with soil drying between crops for 2 to 3 weeks on the growth of rice during six cropping (for six week each) on seven soils varying widely in total N contents (0.07 to 0.35%). The results averaged for the 7 soils indicated that the drymatter production or N uptake of rice was not affected by the water regimes during the six croppings. The field experiment conducted during the dry season for two consecutive years (1976 and 1977) on a near neutral clay soil studied the effects of three water regimes (continuous flooding alternate flooding and soil drying every 2 weeks, and continuous flooding with 2 weeks mid season soil drying after 6 weeks of transplanting) and three levels of fertilizer N (0, 100 and 200 kg N/ha as urea) on grain yield and N uptake of rice. The results confirmed the absence of any significant reduction in grain yield or N uptake as a result of any of the soil drying treatments during the growing season on the unfertilized plots carrying a rice crop. On the plots fertilized with 100 or 200 kg N/na, alternate flooding and drying resulted in a significant depression in both grain yield and N uptake. Soil analysis supported heavy losses of N in the fertilized plots that underwent alternate flooding and soil drying apparently by nitrification and denitrification reactions. The results of this study suggest that alternate flooding and drying of soils in the presence of established rice plants itiay not cause a significant loss of nitrogen in unfertilized plots although in plots fertilized with high rates of N the losses may be large as indicated by the performance of rice crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Averaged over seven soils in the greenhouse, dry matter production and N uptake of rice were not affected by water regime over six croppings.

Treatment
water regimese0
Outcome
drymatter production or N uptakee0
Direction
not affectede0
Comparator
continuous floodinge1
Setting
7 soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results averaged for the 7 soils indicated that the drymatter production or N uptake of rice was not affected by the water regimes during the six croppings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–554 · show in text ↑
e1

“continuous flooding and flooding with soil drying between crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field experiment, soil drying treatments caused no significant reduction in grain yield or N uptake of rice on unfertilized plots.

Treatment
soil drying treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yield or N uptakee0
Direction
absence of any significant reductione0
Qualifier
unfertilized plotse0
Comparator
continuous floodinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results confirmed the absence of any significant reduction in grain yield or N uptake as a result of any of the soil drying treatments during the growing season on the unfertilized plots carrying a rice crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“continuous flooding alternate flooding and soil drying every 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

On plots fertilized with 100 or 200 kg N/ha, alternate flooding and drying significantly depressed both grain yield and N uptake of rice.

Treatment
alternate flooding and dryinge0
Outcome
grain yield and N uptakee0
Direction
depressione0
Qualifier
plots fertilized with 100 or 200 kg N/nae0
Comparator
continuous floodinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“On the plots fertilized with 100 or 200 kg N/na, alternate flooding and drying resulted in a significant depression in both grain yield and N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1349 · show in text ↑
e1

“continuous flooding alternate flooding and soil drying every 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–791 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil analysis supported heavy N losses in fertilized plots under alternate flooding and soil drying, apparently through nitrification and denitrification.

Outcome
heavy losses of Ne0
Qualifier
apparently by nitrification and denitrification reactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil analysis supported heavy losses of N in the fertilized plots that underwent alternate flooding and soil drying apparently by nitrification and denitrification reactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1524 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.